Something that confuddles me about the nature of the priesthood

  • Thread starter Thread starter Liberalsaved
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Where is this stuff coming from on the Holy Grail and who would these others that would have been in this upper room where Jesus held a rather secure and somewhat secret Last Supper, we know of the preparations for it by His instructions, it did’nt sound like some dinner that all of Jerusalem was invited to. There probably were women there but not in the positions you want them to be in and certainly not one of the twelve, I would love to see your proof of women being one of the twelve and therefore part of the preisthood. PLEASE, what are your sources.
 
40.png
Potato1:
Where is this stuff coming from on the Holy Grail and who would these others that would have been in this upper room where Jesus held a rather secure and somewhat secret Last Supper, we know of the preparations for it by His instructions, it did’nt sound like some dinner that all of Jerusalem was invited to. There probably were women there but not in the positions you want them to be in and certainly not one of the twelve, I would love to see your proof of women being one of the twelve and therefore part of the preisthood. PLEASE, what are your sources.
Click to expand...
Simply from the cutoms of the time, that would have gotten him in more trouble had he not obeyed them. I did say likely.
 
40.png
Liberalsaved:
Simply from the cutoms of the time, that would have gotten him in more trouble had he not obeyed them. I did say likely.
Click to expand...
LOL and what customs are these that you speak of? Right, and by him I assume you mean HIM and More trouble than at the last supper, you mean like they would have crucified Him or something? Your posts need to be intelectual, please try to use some backing for your anti Catholic views.
 
40.png
Liberalsaved:
Simply from the cutoms of the time, that would have gotten him in more trouble had he not obeyed them. I did say likely.
Click to expand...
Likely means more of a chance of than not, do you have ANY facts that would even insinuate things were not as they were written? Probably not so “likely” means in your view of the world there is more of a fifty percent chance that YOU are correct and ALL the gospels, Popes, Chuch leaders and indeed even Christ Himself who according to you was scared, has this all wrong.

Yours is one of the Oldest hereseys that was delt with almost immediately in Church history, I will pray that you do not fall into its trap.
 
40.png
Potato1:
LOL and what customs are these that you speak of? Right, and by him I assume you mean HIM and More trouble than at the last supper, you mean like they would have crucified Him or something? Your posts need to be intelectual, please try to use some backing for your anti Catholic views.
Click to expand...
Man, you are really losing it. You laugh at everything you might remotely not agree with and insult me in return.

Conversation over, you aren’t worth talking to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top