Sorry, but SSPX Masses DO NOT normally fulfill the Sunday obligation

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidJoseph
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What exactly is this “schism” of Marcel Lefebvre? Attending the Mass the Church has celebrated for 1700 years? This is considered schism? It seems more schismatic to me to break with tradition and allow every novelty under the sun at Mass. Traditionalists-- even those who support the SSPX-- are in no way schismatic (with the exception of those who reject the post-conciliar popes). They are simply withholding their assent to the revolution that is overtaking the Church at this time in history. When the dust settles, they will prove to be the ones who have kept the faith.
The schism of Marcel Lefebrve was the ordination of the bishops without papal sanction. It was a matter of law. It has no bearing on the Mass at all.
 
Note:

Since the conversation has drifted off the original topic and onto other topics, the thread will be closed. Thanks to all for participating in the discussion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top