Speakers debate U.S. Catholic bishops' role in addressing social policy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maranatha
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Maranatha

Guest
Speakers debate U.S. Catholic bishops’ role in addressing social policy

WASHINGTON (CNS) – A discussion of the U.S. bishops’ 1986 economic pastoral at The Catholic University of America Feb. 9 led to a debate over the role of the bishops in addressing U.S. social policy.

Father J. Bryan Hehir, who headed the bishops’ Office of International Justice and Peace when the bishops adopted the economic pastoral and, three years earlier, their landmark peace pastoral, defended both documents as legitimate efforts to bring the principles of Catholic social teaching to bear on important public policy issues.

He noted that the bishops themselves acknowledged in both letters that the moral authority of what they said was weaker and less binding as they got further into specifics about economic or defense policy.
Joseph Capizzi, a theology professor at Catholic University, said that when he introduces the economic pastoral in moral theology classes, it is the one document seminarians uniformly dislike. He said the pastoral’s biblical perspectives are its strength, but it is “enervated” by its focus on concrete proposals, which work to the detriment of the moral framework the bishops set out.

more
 
Father J. Bryan Hehir, who headed the bishops’ Office of International Justice and Peace when the bishops adopted the economic pastoral and, three years earlier, their landmark peace pastoral, defended both documents as legitimate efforts to bring the principles of Catholic social teaching to bear on important public policy issues.
Ah, Father Hehir … it’s been a while since I’ve heard his name in the news. I’m sure he applauded those documents since it brought the influence of the bishops to bear on political issues important to him.
Joseph Capizzi, a theology professor at Catholic University, said that when he introduces the economic pastoral in moral theology classes, it is the one document seminarians uniformly dislike.
This should be understood to mean that the seminaries are moving in the right direction; this observation is very encouraging.

Ender
 
How interesting…the mindless proponents of laissez-faire capitalism love it when seminarians express discomfort when dealing with economic issues…

All we need to do is teach them to condemn issues around sex or sexuality and the world will be fine…meaning…people have no lives beyond the bedroom…

Sorry to rain on your parade but that’s hardly Catholic and flies in the face of 120 years of Catholic moral reflection on bigger social issues…the WHOLE tradition, not an aberrant interpretation of the tradition.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top