I attended one service where the congregation spoke in “tongues”. I dont know what the original greek says on the matter. If there is some higher form of speech that we can attain then I would expect it to have some sort of consistency across the board no matter whether it be in an american congregation or a chinese congregation or some other congregation yet tongues seem to be nothing more than individuals speaking nonsense. Which leads me to believe that whats said isnt important. Its the “state” of being itself that is important. Its a state of euphoria or sudden grace that puts the person into a fit…no, fit isnt quite the right word, but hopefully yall understand what Im driving at.
People who speak in tongues don’t go into “fits”. They are in complete control of themselves. I’ve said it before, but one of the times I pray in tongues most often is when I’m driving my car. I am in complete control of my senses.
The original Greek speaks of “languages” and in the context 1 Corinthians 14 is speaking of languages unknown to both the speaker and the hearer. Paul says, “For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God; for no one understands him, but he utters mysteries in the Spirit.”
Paul also says that “14 For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays but my mind is unfruitful. 15 What am I to do? I will pray with my spirit, but I will pray with my mind also; I will sing praise with my spirit, but I will sing with my mind also.” It’s not the words, and it’s not the “state” of being. Instead, the value that someone gets from praying in tongues is that when we pray in a tongue we are praying in the spirit.
Is there any incident where a priest started speaking in tongues while celebrating mass? I would think that the Holy Spirit is very present at this time.
No one starts to spontaneously speak in tongues just because the “Holy Spirit is very present at this time.” The Apostle Paul was quite clear in 1 Corinthians 14:
26 What then, brothers? When you come together, each one has a hymn, a lesson, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation.
Let all things be done for building up. 27 If any speak in a tongue, let there be only two or at most three, and each in turn, and let someone interpret. 28 But if there is no one to interpret, let each of them keep silent in church and speak to himself and to God. 29 Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said. 30 If a revelation is made to another sitting there, let the first be silent. 31 For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all be encouraged, 32 and** the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets. 33 For God is not a God of confusion but of peace.**
Simply put, Paul is telling us that whether it be an unknown language or a prophecy, the speaker has control of his or her own spirit. They are not suddenly going to lose control of their mouth and start speaking outside of their control. The Holy Spirit is not like a demonic spirit. He does not deal in compulsion. People who speak in tongues can control when they do so.
Therefore, it is quite understandable why you may never have witnessed a priest start suddenly speaking in tongues during mass because I can’t imagine any good reason for a priest to do that anyway, unless it happened to be a charismatic mass.