Speeding in case of emergency

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlbertaRose
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Again, that one has knowlede about the history of any law does not exempt them from the law. The law still applies to each of us.
It would appear that you are attempting to take a sentance out of context and disprove it. Nothing I said indicates that the law does not apply to each of us; the question is how it applies to each of us.
I mean does the law state one is free to speed if one chooses.
As I cannot understand wht point you are trying to make, I cannot respond. Your comment is too cryptic.
Does the law not also include proscribing unsafe driving practice? Going very slow would violate that law. Your example does not prove one is free to speed.
Again, you are tiking a comment out of context and trying to defeat it. One sentance wasn’t meant to prove one could speed; read the whole of what I wrote.
That does not allow one to break the upper limit at will.
And I did not say that it did; again, you are trying to take one sentance and disprove what I am talking about. This is a non-sequitur.
Right, the judge has the authority, not you or I.
You seem to be looking for an authority in the issue, and not reading the entire post. You also seem to be entirely unfamiliar with speed laws. Again, a non sequitur, as I have not sadi that you ro I have the authority to disregard the law per se or by our own authority. Have you actually read all of what I have said, or do you just pick out the next sentance to quibble with?
Actually, you are wrong; it does matter. You ahve made the presumption that if the State makes a law and then chooses to enforce it in a manner indicating that it is not binding, or is not alwasy binding, that we are bound by the simple fact that the law is on thebooks. That is interesting as a theory but has no basis in fact and again, seems to show that you do not read my statement in toto, but rather attempt to defeat it by drawing out one sentance and attempting to disprove the sentance.

So what? If there is no stop sign one day and and then there is one the next day do I get to run it because things changed?

Again that sometyhing is not enforced does not make it licit to disobey.

That is not in your authority to decide.

The state is chraged with the duty. Do you override the state?

The law exists and it is just. You think you are the authority to decide which stretch of every single road has the proper upper limit?

It may be simple or complex but that is taught by Christ.

Again, you claim to be an expert even above the law. I hope most do not think that way as we would have more chaos then we do now.
[/QUOTE]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top