I’m numbering these statements for others’ convenience should they wish to address these quotes in the thread.
1>
Immensae Caritatis (1973), 3: “As for food and drink serving as nourishment, that tradition must be preserved according to which
the Eucharist was to be taken ‘before all food,’ as Tertullian says, as
a sign of the excellence of the sacramental food.”
2> “Eucharistic Fasting: Preparation and Penance” (1995), Fr. William Saunders: “Moreover, the fast before receiving Holy Communion
creates a physical hunger and thirst for the Lord, which in turn augments the spiritual hunger and thirst we ought to have. In the Old Testament, fasting prepared individuals to receive the action of God and to be placed in His presence. … Therefore, the Eucharistic fast assists us in preparing to receive Holy Communion wholly—
body and soul. This physical mortification strengthens our spiritual focus on the Lord, so that we may humbly encounter the divine Savior who offers Himself to us.”
3> Catechism (1994) #1387: “
To prepare for worthy reception of this sacrament, the faithful should observe the fast required in their Church.”
4> “Gather Faithfully Together” (1997), Cardinal Mahony: “Find just one steady practice that makes you stretch toward the Reign of God we glimpse at Mass: It might be …] fasting from food or distractions and so
becoming thoroughly hungry for God’s Word and the Eucharistic banquet.”
5> “The Communion Fast: A Reconsideration” (2007), Dr. Edward Peters, JCD: “First, it is an exercise in rank legalism to consider abstention from food and drink for an hour as any kind of ‘fast,’ let alone as one intended to help prepare for the inestimable event that is the reception of the Eucharist. Even a moderate meal cannot be digested in one hour; in normal cases hunger does not set in for several hours after eating. … First, regardless of how a one-hour ‘fast’ is calculated,
such a brief period is physically insufficient to place a normal person into anything like a ‘fasting’ state. If, as a millennium and a half suggest,
some significant level of corporal fasting is conducive to the worthy reception of the Eucharist, it must be frankly admitted that such a state cannot be accomplished in one hour’s time. … Third, focusing the eucharistic fast on the reception of communion, rather than on the start of Mass wherein the real and substantial presence of the Lord will be confected,
diminishes appreciation of the liturgy of the Word as a real encounter with Christ important in its own right. The faithful are led to
overlook the proclamation of the Word as being something worthy of preparation, too, and focuses them only on communion. The example of Christ teaching hungry people before feeding them is lost (Mk 6:34-42).”
I especially like #5’s emphasis on how there are two “tables” encountered in the Mass: the table of the Word and the table of the Eucharist. The English translation of
Sacrosanctum Concilium calls for “richer
fare [to] be provided for the faithful at the table of God’s word.” (SC 53) We are fed by the Word in two ways at Mass; should we not fast in preparation for the whole Mass, then, and not just reception of Holy Communion?

Maybe we should fasting from reading and speaking for an hour before hearing the Scriptures…
