J
jpink1019
Guest
This is how the thread was started.
Now I am hoping that the topic can be addressed.
The topic of salvation. Once saved always saved.
Specifically I want to give crazzeto the opportunity to explain his quote " Ordinary as opposed to extraordinary salvation, because I have never heard of it before… And I am hoping for clarification.
Now I am hoping that the topic can be addressed.
The topic of salvation. Once saved always saved.
Specifically I want to give crazzeto the opportunity to explain his quote " Ordinary as opposed to extraordinary salvation, because I have never heard of it before… And I am hoping for clarification.
But you make an assumption in here, and that is that salvation is a one time event which occurs sometime in the past, there for whatever “chruch” you go to doesn’t really matter much.
this is again another misunderstanding.
when you are “Saved” you accept christ. But everyone works out their own salvation from then on. If anything the christian walk becomes harder. It isn’t once get saved you are done working… -_- far from it.
This is not a misunderstanding, as has been pointed out by another poster here. Point in fact, I understand very well this theology, and again, without getting into the particulars it has been rejected by the Catholic Church. In our view, it attempts to take the extrodinary, make it ordinary, and throw out normative salvation.
This is a big problem for a Catholic, very big indeed. If you would like to discuss the particulars of our differences in view of Salvation and Justification then I invite you to start a thread on this topic.
I don’t understand.
A relationship with Christ Jesus is anything but ordinary.
And how is it contingent upon theology?
For clarity, there is such a thing as ordenary as opposed to extrodenary salvation. But we’re about to take this conversation on a left turn. If you want futher clarification, I invite you to quote my post in a new thread and reask your question where it can be delt with more specifically.