That is why I ask the questions I do. I want to know why you must feel that you must do something that Christ has already done for you? Can you support your idea of pergatory withing the pages of the Bible?
I don’t mean to start another
sola scriptura thread, but this begs the question:
Can YOU support your idea of accepting the Bible alone within the pages of the Bible?
My answer (along with every Catholic) is, of course, no. That being said we’d have to go into yet another big discussion on whether or not we should take the Bible by itself or with Tradition but this is not the thread for that. The reason I point this out is that the Bible wasn’t written to substantiate the views of Christians, it was written to create believers and servants of Christ. It’s difficult to use something for a purpose that it wasn’t intended to be used for. And I’m not saying that Purgatory isn’t in the Bible, because it is even if it’s not blatant, and I’m not saying that there aren’t doctrines in the Bible because there are. But the main purpose of the Bible, as John says in his Gospel, is to make believers.
The impression I got from the OP (which you probably didn’t mean to convey) is that you believe that once you profess faith in Christ, sin is completely wiped out. After all, I think you believe that you will go to heaven when you die, and we learn from Revelation that nothing unclean will enter heaven, therefore anyone that professes a belief in OSAS (or sola fide by extension) must believe they are sin free. Unless, of course, unclean means something different to you. If that’s so could you tell me what you mean?
I bring the passage from Revelation because that’s a large concept in the doctrine of Purgatory. Catholics believe, if I can paraphrase a quote from Karl Keating’s book,
Catholicism and Fundamentalism, that no one is “holy enough” to merit heaven but not “evil enough” to deserve everlasting punishment. One point to make is that, while scripture might not blatantly tell us that a middle state exists, it does leave room for a middle state. An example is when Jesus speaks of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit which won’t be forgiven in this life or the next. This would only make sense if two things are true, 1) that we, in fact, still have sin on our souls (meaning we don’t just become sinless, something I believe VociMike alluded to. It also means that Jesus’ sacrifice doesn’t wipe out sin completely like I believe you assert, for “scriptural proof” that we too need to suffer read Col 1:24), and 2) that forgiveness is possible after death. These points, when put together with 1 Corinthians 3:15 (which demonstrates that sinners are indeed forgiven after death), demonstrate the reality of a middle state.
Catholics call this middle state “Purgatory”. While it isn’t easily laid out in scripture, it isn’t contrary to scripture and is alluded to.
Hope this helps,
Zach
P.S. I believe my arguments are still valid even if my assumptions about your beliefs are wrong and still should be taken into consideration.
P.P.S. Sorry to everyone for bringing up sola scriptura and OSAS, it seems that basically all of Protestantisms doctrines completely really on whether or not ss is true…
P.P.P.S. My argument structure may be weird because I was having a conversation at the time of writing this
P.P.P.P.S. Catholics, please correct me if my ideas of Catholic doctrine and scripture deviate from Church teaching! Thank you!