SPLIT: Those Who Leave the Catholic Faith

  • Thread starter Thread starter Socrates4Jesus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks for the sentiment and I understand you believe that the RCC is home.

I am already home in the hand of my Saviour and no man can take me from Him. I stand in the unmerited favor of the one who died for me while I was yet a sinner. It is His righteousness that has made me whole, HE did it ALL, I added nothing.
Are you inferring that the Catholic Church teaches that you must add something of yourself to be saved? That CAtholics don’t believe in the unmerited favor of Christ, who died for us while we were yet sinners? That Catholics think their righteousness comes from somewhere besided Jesus?
 
Of course, God works in mysterious ways.

The CC can and does preach a saving Gospel–history shows us this.

The Catholic nuns didn’t get through to me either when I went to Catholic school, but you can’t ignore the fact that the CC Christianized much of the world. What countries were Christianized by Protestants?
The United States!
 
Interesting concession that a Baptist can preach a saving Gospel while the RCC for 27 years could not.
I"ll repost what I said to you in post #4.

kaycee,

I’m saddened that you did embrace the faith as a child. But it was your inaction that was the cause of it, not Jesus and not the Church. What I hear from many cradle Catholics and I was just as guilty, is that we expect the Church to force our hearts open and pour God in to us. You became alive in Christ when YOU decided to accept him. You could have done that when you were 12 but chose not to. I can say the same for myself. It wasn’t the Church who let us down…we let Jesus down by our laziness. Sure the catechesis could have been better for many of us. I hid behind that excuse for years but you can’t hide behind that forever. Finally I took action and started to learn and live my faith.

There are so many Catholics on fire for the Lord because they put their faith in to action. They responded to the Lord and are strengthened by him in the Eucharist. I pray that some day you’ll find your way home. Trust me, it’s better than you ever imagined.
 
Are you inferring that the Catholic Church teaches that you must add something of yourself to be saved? That CAtholics don’t believe in the unmerited favor of Christ, who died for us while we were yet sinners? That Catholics think their righteousness comes from somewhere besided Jesus?
Apparently Initial Justification is not earned, but maintaining a state of grace demands cooporation and merit. That appears to be what Trent states.

Canon XXXI. If anyone says that the one justified sins when he performs good works with a view to an eternal reward, let him be anathema.

Canon XXXII. If any one saith, that the good works of one that is justified are in such manner the gifts of God, that they are not also the good merits of him that is justified, by the good works which he performs through the grace of God and the merit of Jesus Christ, whose living member he is, does not truly merit increase of grace, eternal life, and the attainment of that eternal life— if so be, however, that he depart in grace,—and also an increase of glory: let him be anathema
 
Of course, God works in mysterious ways.

The CC can and does preach a saving Gospel–history shows us this.

The Catholic nuns didn’t get through to me either when I went to Catholic school, but you can’t ignore the fact that the CC Christianized much of the world. What countries were Christianized by Protestants?
Can you tell me what the saving gospel according to the RCC is?
 
We don’t add anything, I agree, but faith.

So when I make the profession of Faith at Church joined in the we believe we are the body of Christ.

Do you remember it? Dessert
Unfortunately, I do believe the RCC does add dogmatic faith to the mix and not just Faith in Jesus. The RCC declares that faith alone does not save as I have heard many times on this board from other Catholics. I do not believe the RC gospel can save.
 
Unfortunately, I do believe the RCC does add dogmatic faith to the mix and not just Faith in Jesus. The RCC declares that faith alone does not save as I have heard many times on this board from other Catholics. I do not believe the RC gospel can save.
But then, that is just your non-infallible opinion…based primarily upon what you want to be true.

Therefore…you could well be wrong in a big way.
 
I"ll repost what I said to you in post #4.

kaycee,

I’m saddened that you did embrace the faith as a child. But it was your inaction that was the cause of it, not Jesus and not the Church. What I hear from many cradle Catholics and I was just as guilty, is that we expect the Church to force our hearts open and pour God in to us. You became alive in Christ when YOU decided to accept him. You could have done that when you were 12 but chose not to. I can say the same for myself. It wasn’t the Church who let us down…we let Jesus down by our laziness. Sure the catechesis could have been better for many of us. I hid behind that excuse for years but you can’t hide behind that forever. Finally I took action and started to learn and live my faith.

There are so many Catholics on fire for the Lord because they put their faith in to action. They responded to the Lord and are strengthened by him in the Eucharist. I pray that some day you’ll find your way home. Trust me, it’s better than you ever imagined.
Maybe the Church as an Institutiion did not, but Catholics are definitely let down my individuals within the church. I just read some depositions by persons who were sexuallly abused by priests. But, even when circumstances are not so extreme, one can be let down my faithless teachers, and faithless parents. Growing up in an alcoholic and violent home, what was demonstrated to me was the opposite of what I was being taught in CCD. The whole of it seemed hypocritical to me. I am not trying to place blame here, just trying to point out that it is not any more right to blame the people who left the church, and finding an authentic faith experience elsewhere.
 
Can you tell me what the saving gospel according to the RCC is?
That God sent his only son, born of a woman, to die on the cross to redeem us of our sins. That, by believing in Him, we can have eternal life. That the Church, which He established as His Body on earth, provides and preserves the portals of grace through which we encounter our living Lord in the sacraments.

Maybe that is not very well worded, but that is how I hear it today.
 
Unfortunately, I do believe the RCC does add dogmatic faith to the mix and not just Faith in Jesus. The RCC declares that faith alone does not save as I have heard many times on this board from other Catholics. I do not believe the RC gospel can save.
I think it is just a matter of semantics, kaycee. Catholics believe that we are saved by grace, through faith, by the blood of Jesus shed on the cross for remission of sins. It is just that our understanding of saving faith includes the notion of discipleship, which some “sola fide” practices do not. In the great commission, Jesus said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age.” Matt 28:17-20

He did not say “make sure everyone prays the sinners prayer” or " make sure they ask me to come into their heart as their personal Lord and Saviour". He did not say “tell them faith alone will save them”. No, he said baptize, and teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. Becoming disciples takes more than just faith alone, it requires obedience, and a lot of work to cooperate with the graces of the Holy Spirit. I don’t see how you can say these words of Jesus are not saving! Usually peoples 'last words" are very important. Why would you discount these?
 
Maybe the Church as an Institutiion did not, but Catholics are definitely let down my individuals within the church.
I absolutely agree! Poor example and poor catechesis are two things that I hear people my age (40) say all of the time. My point is at what point do you take responsibility for your own ignorance. You can’t keep blaming the Church or your parents. When KC decided to take his faith seriously he fell in love with Jesus. Same for me. It was all there from the start but I didn’t make it active in my life. It’s my life, not my parents, or Godparents, or teachers, or priest. My life. If my dad didn’t teach me how to drive a car would I just sit around and blame him for not teaching me? No, I’d find a way. Yet so many of my peers will blame everyone but themselves for their own ignorance. The bible is the most published book in the world yet so many never read it. And how many of those same people point a finger at the Church as the reason why they didn’t know their faith. Heck, all they’d have to do is pay attention to the readings at Mass! Sooner or later adults must take responsibility for their own ignorance and stop being lazy.
 
The United States!
You say the US was Christianized by Protestants. Protestants certainly had influence, but so did the Catholics

What about the French & English Jesuits, the North American martyrs–Isaac Jogues & Jean de Brebeuf, the Franciscans, Mother Elizabeth Seton, Bishop John Carroll, Kateri Tekakwitha, Mother Frances Cabrini, Bishop John Neumann, Katharine Drexel, the Georgian martyrs? There are too many to list them all.

Many Catholics came from England (where they were persecuted) and settled in the state of Maryland which was named after–guess who–The Blessed Virgin Mary.
 
Unfortunately, I do believe the RCC does add dogmatic faith to the mix and not just Faith in Jesus. The RCC declares that faith alone does not save as I have heard many times on this board from other Catholics. I do not believe the RC gospel can save.
Yes you’re right. The CC declares that faith alone does not save. It teaches this because this is what the Bible teaches and what Jesus himself says.

How can you read the sermon on the mount and say that all one needs to do for salvation is have faith?
 
You say the US was Christianized by Protestants. Protestants certainly had influence, but so did the Catholics

What about the French & English Jesuits, the North American martyrs–Isaac Jogues & Jean de Brebeuf, the Franciscans, Mother Elizabeth Seton, Bishop John Carroll, Kateri Tekakwitha, Mother Frances Cabrini, Bishop John Neumann, Katharine Drexel, the Georgian martyrs? There are too many to list them all.

Many Catholics came from England (where they were persecuted) and settled in the state of Maryland which was named after–guess who–The Blessed Virgin Mary.
Oh I certainlydo not detract from any such contributions. But Catholicism as a whole was frowned upon here, and there were not Catholics accepted among the framers, who were all Protestants and Deists. In fact discrimmination against Catholicism has persisted for 200 years!
 
Oh I certainlydo not detract from any such contributions. But Catholicism as a whole was frowned upon here, and there were not Catholics accepted among the framers, who were all Protestants and Deists. In fact discrimmination against Catholicism has persisted for 200 years!
psst…Off topic. 😃
 
Apparently Initial Justification is not earned, but maintaining a state of grace demands cooporation and merit. That appears to be what Trent states.

Canon XXXI. If anyone says that the one justified sins when he performs good works with a view to an eternal reward, let him be anathema.

Canon XXXII. If any one saith, that the good works of one that is justified are in such manner the gifts of God, that they are not also the good merits of him that is justified, by the good works which he performs through the grace of God and the merit of Jesus Christ, whose living member he is, does not truly merit increase of grace, eternal life, and the attainment of that eternal life— if so be, however, that he depart in grace,—and also an increase of glory: let him be anathema
426;Compendium (2006-2010) (2025-2027) ( Catechism)
What is Merit?
In general merit refers to the right to recompense for a good deed. With regard to God, we ourselves are not able to merit anything, having received everything freely from him. However, God gives us the possibility of aquiring merit through unin with the love of Christ, who is the source of our merits before God. The merits for good works, therefore must be attributed in the first place to the grace of God AND then to the free will of man.

427; Compendium (2010-2011) (2027) (Catechism)
What are the goods that we can merit?
Moved by the Holy Spirit, we can merit for ourselves and for others the graces for our sanctificatiion and for the attainment of eternal life. Even temporal goods, suitable for us , can be merited in accordance with the plan of God. No one, however, can merit the initial grace which is at the origin of conversion and justification.

I don’t have a Cannon and just started reading the Catechism after I have been back about a year. The Compendium is like a condensed version of the CAT.

Merit would be a good discussion for another thread and I have not really studied in depth yet so all I would like to add is we are NEW creatures in Christ, I don’t know where that verse is but I like it. Dessert
 
Apparently Initial Justification is not earned, but maintaining a state of grace demands cooporation and merit. That appears to be what Trent states.

Canon XXXI. If anyone says that the one justified sins when he performs good works with a view to an eternal reward, let him be anathema.

Canon XXXII. If any one saith, that the good works of one that is justified are in such manner the gifts of God, that they are not also the good merits of him that is justified
, by the good works which he performs through the grace of God and the merit of Jesus Christ, whose living member he is, does not truly merit increase of grace, eternal life, and the attainment of that eternal life— if so be, however, that he depart in grace,—and also an increase of glory: let him be anathemaTrent agrees with the New Testament, while Sola Fide does not, therefore the statements of these Cannons is correct and you are not.

You can try to portray your beliefs as Biblically accurate and allege whatever you please, but you cannot make a case for yourself that is irrefutable from scripture alone, much less the verifiable history of Christianity, and the ECF. In short yours is a new wind of doctrines of men concocted a mere 500 years ago. That makes your message “another gospel”.
 
Trent agrees with the New Testament, while Sola Fide does not, therefore the statements of these Cannons is correct and you are not.

You can try to portray your beliefs as Biblically accurate and allege whatever you please, but you cannot make a case for yourself that is irrefutable from scripture alone, much less the verifiable history of Christianity, and the ECF. In short yours is a new wind of doctrines of men concocted a mere 500 years ago. That makes your message “another gospel”.
Once again, you present the case with clarity and simplicity. Kudos!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top