N
nodito
Guest
No baiting, this is an honest question. If you support “same sex marriage,” what are your thoughts on polygamy? Just another life style choice? Right, wrong, or something else? I’m sincerely curious.
So it’s not wrong, just impractical? Should it be legal?I’d have to go with ‘something else’. I have friends who are into that lifestyle, so I’m familiar with how the ‘rules’ are supposed to work…but in all honesty, I’ve never seen a polygamous relationship work out–somebody always ends up feeling left out and getting hurt.
I dunno, maybe somewhere, out there, it’s worked and all parties were happy, I just haven’t seen or heard of it myself.
Hi Laurent LUG, thanks for responding. How is it different? I mean, obviously, there are more people. But if a man loves two or three women, should he be permitted to marry all of them?I’m not against SSM , besides this something completely different !!
I was talking to somebody about this, and I think where my brain was going was, “How could it be worked out?” For example, John and Jane are married. John wants to marry Sally. Does Jane have to give legal consent, or can John just marry Sally anyway? What if Jane also wants to marry Tom? What are John and Sally’s legal rights in this? What if Sally is bisexual, and wants to be married to both John and Jane, but later decides she wants to divorce John, but still be married to Jane, but Jane still wants to be married to both John and Sally?So it’s not wrong, just impractical? Should it be legal?
If we do it the biblical route only the men decide.I was talking to somebody about this, and I think where my brain was going was, “How could it be worked out?” For example, John and Jane are married. John wants to marry Sally. Does Jane have to give legal consent, or can John just marry Sally anyway? What if Jane also wants to marry Tom? What are John and Sally’s legal rights in this? What if Sally is bisexual, and wants to be married to both John and Jane, but later decides she wants to divorce John, but still be married to Jane, but Jane still wants to be married to both John and Sally?
My brain started to melt at this point. Maybe somebody else has this worked out, but I can’t see it.
I would say that one can’t use “it’s my religion” as an excuse to do something immoral, like offer child sacrifices. I think we have to decide what’s good for the country and what’s not, and we legislate morality based on reason, even if it conflicts with certain people’s religious beliefs.For those who usually argue for religious freedom, how would you argue against making polygamy legal if it is a part of the belief system of a group?
If that’s the relationship that you want to truly be in and all parties involved are consenting adults, then I don’t have a problem with it.No baiting, this is an honest question. If you support “same sex marriage,” what are your thoughts on polygamy? Just another life style choice? Right, wrong, or something else? I’m sincerely curious.
There’s a vast difference between child sacrifice and three people getting married.I would say that one can’t use “it’s my religion” as an excuse to do something immoral, like offer child sacrifices. I think we have to decide what’s good for the country and what’s not, and we legislate morality based on reason, even if it conflicts with certain people’s religious beliefs.
Thankfully, Catholicism is perfectly rational and based on natural law.![]()
Granted. I was using it an example of something that a person might claim was part of their religion and yet that the majority of CAF readers would agree is immoral and would not have a problem outlawing.There’s a vast difference between child sacrifice and three people getting married.
The arrangement might well involve children, though, correct? Does that factor in to the morality of the situation?If that’s the relationship that you want to truly be in and all parties involved are consenting adults, then I don’t have a problem with it.
Why would it involve children?The arrangement might well involve children, though, correct? Does that factor in to the morality of the situation?
There are a huge number of Obama supporters here, you’d be surprised.Granted. I was using it an example of something that a person might claim was part of their religion and yet that the majority of CAF readers would agree is immoral and would not have a problem outlawing.
Right folks, you have to remember that the sexual revolution divorced procreation from sex and children from marriage. The revisionist viewof marriage doesn’t really care if children enter the picture at all. Revisionist arriage is a plaything of consenting adults.Why would it involve children?