C
clem456
Guest
I think you missed the point here also…So if a Priest asks the Parish to dress appropriately and not wear shorts and flip flops he is a tool of the devil?
I think you missed the point here also…So if a Priest asks the Parish to dress appropriately and not wear shorts and flip flops he is a tool of the devil?
Here lies the problem. Some would say there is not a clear doctrinal statement on this issue.Not do I, as interpreted by the Vatican.
![]()
And some would be looking for a fight they will not get.Here lies the problem. Some would say there is not a clear doctrinal statement on this issue.
Cardinal Burke prefect of the Supreme Court of the Apostolic Signature and a former archbishop of St. Louis.
That sound you just heard was traditionalists having a collective conniption fit.On the other hand, Cardinal Burke says, the practice of reading scriptural passages in modern languages has been a “tremendous gift” of the post-Vatican II liturgy that should be incorporated in the Tridentine Mass
I see that even after all the effort that Vatican has put into this, the SSPX still chose to throw them under the bus.The Society continues to uphold the declarations and the teachings of the constant Magisterium of the Church in regard to all the novelties of the Second Vatican Council which remain tainted with errors, and also in regard to the reforms issued from it. We find our sure guide in this uninterrupted Magisterium which, by its teaching authority, transmits the revealed Deposit of Faith in perfect harmony with the truths that the entire Church has professed, always and everywhere.
That sound you just heard was traditionalists having a collective conniption fit.
How many laity, in real life, have you known that tell other people what to wear?Not at all. But if a layperson thinks they should be doing the priest’s work for him then perhaps so.
On this message board, plenty!How many laity, in real life, have you known that tell other people what to wear?
But these are from people tired of the inaction of some Parishes. Seriously, when I read these modesty threads, I feel like some were trying to guilt trip me because I want more modesty.On this message board, plenty!
But these are from people tired of the inaction of some Parishes. Seriously, when I read these modesty threads, I feel like some were trying to guilt trip me because I want more modesty.
Seriously, what is the problem with that?
Blessings!
![]()
2 Samuel 6 came to my mind for some reason.On this message board, plenty!
But every place can have a reasonable standard of modesty, not necessarily a planetary one.Maybe because there is no “standard” of modesty.
My typical summer outfit- denim capri pants, a top that may or may not be sleeveless (but not “skimpy”) and my Beirkenstocks. To many who post in the “modesty threads” this would be unacceptable.
If the sequence of events transpired the way I understand they did and the CDF modified the preamble from a form that was agreeable to the Society and sanctioned by the Pontiff, then you have it backwards. It was actually Cardinal Levada who threw the Pope “under the bus”.I see that even after all the effort that Vatican has put into this, the SSPX still chose to throw them under the bus.
I would like to see more modesty in Parishes, but that doesn’t necessarily means that people has do wears stylish or elegant clothing. Just non vulgar, scandalous, immodest outfits. Some of us live in very strange places… yes I’m surprised too when I read about your Orthodox Oasis Dioceses, so maybe is from lack of exposition to such environments?Lately on this forum it seems that there is an overall trend of looking at external manifestations of comport or dress and making speculations about internal activity or intent. In addition, there seems to be a trend of taking one’s own personal preferences about comport and trying to pass them off as some sort of authoritative teaching. For example, see the thread on putting your arm around your spouse at Mass.
Personally, I believe that it is important to be presentable and dress well when going to Mass and I make efforts to do so. However, I have also been to Masses where people were in shorts and flip flops. etc. and found a very reverential environment and people who took their faith seriously. Since I have become Catholic, I have lived in some of the more poor places in the USA where for many, putting on a decent pair of blue jeans, a T-shirt that they don’t wear for work, and shoes instead of boots is dressing up. At a local Campus Catholic Center I used to help out at, the same thing could be said for a college student wearing khaki shorts, a decent t-shirt or polo, and a pair of Nike or Under Armor flip flops which probably cost upwards of $40.
There are people I know who dress very well at Mass but openly dissent with Church doctrine; and, one of the guys I went through RCIA with shows up to Mass all the time in shorts and a T-shirt but happens to be one of the most pious and prayerful guys I know, and is completely orthodox in his positions. Not to mention that he spends half of his day debating with oneness Pentecostals about the Bible and Church doctrine.
Are there times when someone’s dress does become a legitimate issue? Of course, particularly if things are scandalous. For example, I know that I should not turn my head to the left too much during Mass because there is a young college-age girl who wears very tight and often low cut shirts as well as skirts which I would classify as a bit too short for her. I wish she would not wear that clothing, and I do find it inappropriate. What is interesting though is that she seems to be one of the more prayerful and pious young people in our parish. She is at adoration frequently, almost all parish functions, comes to regular daily mass, and serves as a Lector. In addition, in her defense, she is a very tall girl (probably 6 feet) who is also slender in build but with a large chest. I would imagine it is not easy for her to find clothing appropriate for her age, that actually fits.
Bottom line? The old adage of not being able to judge a book by its cover holds true more often than not. In addition, many of us, including myself, could stand to pay a little less attention to what others are wearing or how they are sitting at Mass and a little more attention to God.
Having said all of that. I certainly prefer a beautiful and reverential Mass, though I am more spiritually fulfilled by the OF rather than the EF, and am not willing to compromise on teaching the Truth of the Faith.
Why we are having this conversation in a thread about the SSPX and why it always seems to turn into this, I am not sure; but here we are again, so those are my thoughts.
You’re assuming that the Pope was unaware of the changes made to the preamble, and also assuming it wasn’t Benedict who authorized the changes.If the sequence of events transpired the way I understand they did and the CDF modified the preamble from a form that was agreeable to the Society and sanctioned by the Pontiff, then you have it backwards. It was actually Cardinal Levada who threw the Pope “under the bus”.
Yes, that is my assumption.You’re assuming that the Pope was unaware of the changes made to the preamble, and also assuming it wasn’t Benedict who authorized the changes.
Such an accusation should be substantiated in general and most especially here on this forum.You’re assuming that the Pope was unaware of the changes made to the preamble, and also assuming it wasn’t Benedict who authorized the changes.
And this post violates the rules that moderator Thomas Casey set back in post #62.If the sequence of events transpired the way I understand they did and the CDF modified the preamble from a form that was agreeable to the Society and sanctioned by the Pontiff, then you have it backwards. It was actually Cardinal Levada who threw the Pope “under the bus”.
No different than thinking that it’s a giant conspiracy and the head of the CDF is out to attack the SSPX. My suggestion actually makes more sense in the context of their roles and friendship.Such an accusation should be substantiated in general and most especially here on this forum.
Brother JR,
Some of us live in very chaotic Dioceses. (I’m in South America). Lack of Orthodoxy and Orthopraxis, strange Liturgies, heretical Priests in the media (and many Parishes, bad Catechesis…
Is in this forum where I read about “Orthodox Oasis” Dioceses.
I’m not ignoring the work of some Religious Communities here, but the situation isn’t very good.
Maybe the people that feel in a similar way that the one you described face similar (if not worse) situations. Obviously if they think the SSPX are the only faithful Catholics is exagerated, but when they see that their Chapels are only of the few places when they can heard sound doctrine, that creates a powerful impression on them.
Blessings!
![]()