S
SamDash
Guest
I find this entire discussion troubling.
The SSPX is a schismatic group. Their sacraments may be valid, but they are certainly illicit.
Certainly, Catholics should be discouraged in no uncertain terms from participating in these illicit sacraments.
If a Catholic asked me if he should take Communion and go to Confession at the Greek Orthodox church in town, should I respond, “Well, their sacraments are valid,” or ,“No, go to a Catholic church.”?
The SSPX is a schismatic group. Their sacraments may be valid, but they are certainly illicit.
Certainly, Catholics should be discouraged in no uncertain terms from participating in these illicit sacraments.
If a Catholic asked me if he should take Communion and go to Confession at the Greek Orthodox church in town, should I respond, “Well, their sacraments are valid,” or ,“No, go to a Catholic church.”?
While the priests of the Society of St. Pius X are validly ordained, they are also suspended a divinis, that is they are forbidden by the Church from celebrating the Mass and the sacraments because of their illicit (or illegal) ordination to the diaconate and the priesthood without proper incardination (cf. canon 265). In the strict sense there are no “lay members” of the Society of St. Pius X, only those who frequent their Masses and receive the sacraments from them.
ewtn.com/library/CURIA/CEDSSPX2.HTMWhile it is true that participation in the Mass at the chapels of the Society of St. Pius X does not of itself constitute “formal adherence to the schism”, such adherence can come about over a period of time as one slowly imbibes a schismatic mentality which separates itself from the teaching of the Supreme Pontiff and the entire Catholic Church classically exemplified in A Rome and Econe Handbook which states in response to question 14 that the SSPX defends the traditional catechisms and therefore the Old Mass, and so attacks the Novus Ordo, the Second Vatican Council and the New Catechism, all of which more or less undermine our unchangeable Catholic faith.