B
bear06
Guest
Interestingly enough, Pope Benedict has also left him in office.And do you really think John Paul II would allow someone who did not understand his version of ecumenism, to stay in that office?
Interestingly enough, Pope Benedict has also left him in office.And do you really think John Paul II would allow someone who did not understand his version of ecumenism, to stay in that office?
I think so. But he never promulgated it as an infallible doctrine.Could we just cut to the chase here. Are you saying that John Paul II believed in false ecumenism?
Do you think John Paul II would appoint someone as the president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity who he believed had a false understanding of Ecumenism? Does that make sense, when Ecumenism was such an important part of John Paul II’s Papacy?Could we just cut to the chase here. Are you saying that John Paul II believed in false ecumenism?
I’d just like to say that I honor you for your candor. It’s refreshing because most will not actually say what they mean. That said, I think you to be horribly wrong but I respect you.I think so. But he never promulgated it as an infallible doctrine.
BTW, this would all seem a little more than off topic.Do you think John Paul II would appoint someone as the president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity who he believed had a false understanding of Ecumenism? Does that make sense, when Ecumenism was such an important part of John Paul II’s Papacy?
I refuse to beleive that John Paul II would be that derilect in his duty. How dare you for implying otherwise. John Paul II would never allow a person to serve as the head of the Ecumenical movement who he beleived to have a false idea of ecumenism. Never would he allow such a thing. John Paul II would only appoint a person in charge of Ecumenism who believed just as he did. Ecumenism was far too important for John Paul II. How dare you for implying that the Pope would allow such a thing. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Thanks Bear. Not a day goes by that I am not torn by the strife in our Church. Can I count on you to pray for me?I’d just like to say that I honor you for your candor. It’s refreshing because most will not actually say what they mean. That said, I think you to be horribly wrong but I respect you.
In other words. “USMC would not say what you did. Had he, I would have ignored all the points he made, which I could not resond to, and would have attacked him personally. USMC didn’t fall into the trap, but instead posted in the form of a question to me. This frustrated me, since I knew he was right and didn’t know what to say. Therefore, thank you for not doing the same.”I’d just like to say that I honor you for your candor. It’s refreshing because most will not actually say what they mean. That said, I think you to be horribly wrong but I respect you.
Absolutely! I’m counting on you pray for me too!Thanks Bear. Not a day goes by that I am not torn by the strife in our Church. Can I count on you to pray for me?
I missed the part where I attacked giuseppeTO and ignored all his posts.In other words. “USMC would not say what you did. Had he, I would have ignored all the points he made, which I could not resond to, and would have attacked him personally. USMC didn’t fall into the trap, but instead posted in the form of a question to me. This frustrated me, since I knew he was right and didn’t know what to say. Therefore, thank you for not doing the same.”
14 Q. Who are heretics?
A. Heretics are those of the baptised who obstinately refuse to believe some truth revealed by God and taught as an article of faith by the Catholic Church; for example, the Arians, the Nestorians and the various sects of Protestants.
I’m not sure that they aren’t heretics too because it would seem that they are rejecting Pastor Aeternus (a dogmatic constitution) in their deeds. (I know Bombay’s probably been waiting for me to bring up Pastor Aeternus so I thought I’d give him some fodder). I definitely couldn’t say that their stance is beyond all doubt free from heresy.That doesn’t apply to the SSPX. But the next few do: