I
Immaculata90
Guest
I do think this is a little bit of a sticky situation–it might be interesting to ask one of the apologists about this one. I don’t think that anyone should ever choose to go to the Mass, but I do believe it is a viable last chance deal. Isn’t it also acceptable to go to a Byzantine Mass–a priest I know was talking about going to the cities with a group of us because he has always wanted to concelebrate a byzantine Mass, and he is a very solid priest. I would say these Masses are decently Catholic. The EF doesn’t allow for any type of interpretation or creativeness to be added into the Mass. The SSPX follow the rules of the Mass—they didn’t just make it up.I can’t agree with this. The Orthodox have valid priests and a valid Eucharist, but going to their Liturgy does not fulfill one’s obligation. Canon Law states that one has to go to a “Mass” of any Catholic Rite. So again the question, since they are suspended and shouldn’t be saying Mass in the first place, how Catholic is their Mass?
They may have the faculties, but I have seen a lot of atrocious OF Masses that are borderline not valid.Even an abusive OF Mass is more licit than their Mass. Because the priest saying the OF Mass has at least faculties from the Local Ordinary to say the Mass in the first place.