Like the Eucharist or Mary. Why can't there be various interpretations of the Eurcharist -transubstantiation, but also, for example, the spiritual presence and enrichment of Christ that does not impact the physical bread and wine? Or, Mary? Why must be believe that she was the only human being born immaculately? Why is that necessary for her to be honored? This can seem to be a gradual development growing out of Catholic theology, not defined until 1864 and Pius IX, and not clearly substantiated by scripture. The same may be said about her perpetual virginity ('purity' - as though marital sex is impure). And about her Assumption as well, not defined until 1950.
Mary Magdalene is an admirable figure in the scriptures. I guess I have a problem that goes beyond her to this whole focus on saints. I admire many, but some of the stories about certain saints strike me as preposterous. What is the one about Loreto??? I forget the details, but something to the effect that the childhood home of Jesus was moved by angels from the Holy Land to Italy??? And people looked up and saw Mary and the Baby Jesus on/in that house. Really, now!
But faith is important, and God bless all people of faith who embrace and practice the gospel of love. What troubles me is that there are those devout people - even here on CAF - who seem to feel somewhat like that crazy man in Norway who wanted to return to the 'good old days' of medievalism with its serfdoms, divine-right monarchies, ignorance, superstitions, diseases, and bigotry.