R
ratio1
Guest
I read that as late as 1903 a Monarch vetoed a Pope candidate. In fact in that conclave it elected our great St Pius X as Pope as the alternate candidate who was the more popular cardinal was vetoed by a king.
I found this astounding and ironic in light of the hoo ha surrounding the Vatican china deal when
I found this astounding and ironic in light of the hoo ha surrounding the Vatican china deal when
- Even the Papal office has been vetoed by a state before so what’s the big deal about bishop appointments relative speaking?
- The Vatican Vietnam deal has been running for years and no one seems to make a big fuss about it.
Last edited: