You are really good at not answering questions. I need to know if this breaks any rule or maybe the word here would be rubric. You are basically telling me here it’s not good. Not good but allowable? Or not good and not allowable?
I don’t think there is a lot in the rubrics about what you can’t do. I think the idea is that if it’s not in the rubrics, you shouldn’t do it.
I think buffalo’s answer wasn’t bad, really. Then-Cardinal Ratzinger explained what the problem is with this. I don’t think the idea is to do anything that isn’t explicitly forbidden. I mean, “not good” is an important thing to know, regardless of whether it is allowable.
You had a danger word in your own post: there should be no such thing as a “performance” during the liturgy. I’m also having a hard time thinking at what point in the Mass it would be allowable to have instrumental music as the focus of attention at all. I mean there might be some as background at some point, but people’s attention would be focused on the priest, so applause would just be weird.
It would probably be easier to answer the question if you mentioned why you need to know about this prior to attending Mass there again.
- Are you wondering whether it’s OK to join the applause?
- Are you wondering whether you should go up to the priest afterwards and say something about it?
- Are you wondering whether you should write the pastor and mention it?
- Are you wondering whether you should report it to the bishop?
If it’s the first, then I would suggest joining the applause very briefly and then stopping.
If it’s the second, I’d advise against it. He won’t be in the correct frame of mind to take it in.
If it’s the third or fourth, it would make more sense to wait and see if it happens again, remembering more of the specifics, and then ask the question again, with the specifics of the more recent occasion.
Just MHO.
–Jen