Staples White debate on Purgatory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholicdeacon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course we accept the authority of Scripture. My point is this, Jesus left us with a Church to teach us what the Scripture meant…if everyone could interpret the Scripture for themselves, we would have a dividing faction of believers on every street corner…oh wait we do…they are called protestants all believing the Holy Spirit is guiding them, while fighting with every other church down the street.

James White and Tim Staples are both using the Scriptures. You have to decide which one knows what he is talking about. The one whose Church was founded on the Rock, upon the gates of hell would not prevail against, or the one who came from John Calvin and everybody stood against…
And one more problem we have before we move on to your next post. If we assume that the CC is the “Rock” and therefore, White must be wrong, and Staples must be right. There is no “you have to decide”. It’s already been decided, b/c Tim Staples is a part of the “Rock” on which the church was founded…

…this is circular reasoning.
 
Sorry…don’t mean to confuse…I am just saying I am not so sure. I can see that Paul is talking about judgement. For example Paul says in verse 13 “each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and fire will test what sort of work each one has done.” Now Paul is talking about “each man” not a subset of humanity that has venial sins on their souls. Sounds to me like judgement. What is your interpretation?
Paul says, this process is for those souls who “will be saved” after the process of passing through fire. He doesn’t say this process is for those who will NOT be saved. Therefore, seperation of the saved and the damned must have already taken place… i.e. judgement has occured on “the Day”.

If one dies with mortal sin on their soul Paul teaches and the Church teaches, they will not inherit heaven.
 
It sounds nice to say that you accept the authority of scripture and tradition, but get it right. For Rome, the only real authority is the Church (which also has dividing factions and disagreements within itself). The comment about ALL Protestants is false and you know that.

We obviously would disagree on your second paragraph as well, but I only aim to correct you on your first sentence on your own doctrine, or rather your definition of authority may be what’s in question here.
Can you elaborate on the dividing factions and disagreements within Rome, in light of the whole church using one catechism that sets forth our beliefs.

Also, how is my comment about ALL protestants false? Each new denomination that springs up disagrees with the other two that began last week all proclaiming to be “bible churches.”
 
Thankyou A78.

I have no problem praying for the dead as I do think think praying for each other is important and people who have sinned may even be given new life through our intercession (1 Jon 5:16). I don’t see Christianity as an individual pursuit.To be honest I’m not sure what affect our prayers for the dead have, but if there is a chance they may help someone by whatever means, then I am happy to pray. I perhaps lean a little more to the Orthodox Church position here that does not try to analyze and define how they help, but simply speculates that there may be an opportunity between death and the final judgement for forgiveness of sins. This is perhaps were I depart from formal Catholic doctrine and the systematic theology of Dr White - I find both seem to have a tendency of wanting to be more precise than is really possible.
The Church has not exactely offered clarification on how our prayers help those in Purgatory. The Church simply says they DO help in some way. In any case- the point-- whether or not you want to call it “Purgatory” or not---- IF our prayers are needed, ovbiously the person has not yet made it to heaven, and obvioulsy they are not in Hell.
But this caused me much more trouble; that sounds like our Lord can not save us by himself, no matter how much we may repent and place ourselves at his mercy, and that we need to be saved, in part, through our own suffering. Could you talk a little bit more about that as my initial reaction is to want to grab hold of Sola Fide and Sola Gratia.
Christ work is sufficient-- in fact it is more then sufficient to save us. The question is not whether the work of Christ is all sufficient----but HOW he goes about redemption.

Sin came from man, not God. Hence, man is quite obviously the problem, not God. Consequently what better way then to make the problem the solution? This is exactely what Christ has done. Through the first Adam, man refused God’s friendship, but in the New Adam, (Christ) man restores it. Christ places the merits of salvation within the Church. Becasue the merits of Christ are within the Church, the power of Salvation is within the Church, Salvation is found in the Church. Do you see?

When Catholics speak of the concept of “merit” it is in the Augustinian sense. In other words we do not say to God “Pay me what you owe” but rather “Pay me what you promised.” Our merit to God, or rather before God is a merit through Grace. Our works are meritorious becasue they are preceeded by Grace, done in Grace, and proceeded by Grace. My works becasue they are in union with the Son are the work of Christ.

An analogy: Imagine yourself as a child, and you have no money of your own. How did you often recieve money? From your parents. In a sense the merits of your parents became yours becasue they freely shared their merits with you. The merits of your parents labor (money, a paycheck) were freely bestowed upon you, and you were free to use those merits in whatever way you choose. Now, imagine further that you took the money your parents gave you and purhcased with it a gift, and you gave that gift to your parents. Is that gift any less meaningful to your parents becasue you purchased it with their money? Of course not. In a sense you took their merits, and returned the merits to them as a gift of love. This is what Catholics mean when they speak of human merit before God, or meriting salvation. It is not a merit of debt, but one of love.

Again, Catholic position: We are saved by Grace ALONE, which is operative in Faith AND works.

Protestant Position: We are saved by Grace Alone, through Faith Alone. Faith in the Protestant sense is the engine producing the works, but the works themselves have no merit before God. Salvation (Justification) is seen in a legal sense- the righteousness of Christ is an imputation.

In the Catholic sense the life of God is not merely imputed, but poured into our being, and thus it effects a real change within us, our being changes. Grace perfects nature. Grace frees us, sin is alien to our nature. To be sinless is not to be somehow superhuman, but completely and totally human. God literally shares his very life with us, and we participate in it. This is what Paul means when he says we are made “Son’s in the Son.”
 
Just to clarify,
“The task of giving an authentic interpretation of the Word of God, whether in its written form or in the form of Tradition, has been entrusted to the living teaching office of the Church alone. Its authority in this matter is exercised in the name of Jesus Christ.” This means that the task of interpretation has been entrusted to the bishops in communion with the successor of Peter, the Bishop of Rome.

“Yet this Magisterium is not superior to the Word of God, but is its servant. It teaches only what has been handed on to it. At the divine command and with the help of the Holy Spirit, it listens to this devotedly, guards it with dedication and expounds it faithfully. All that it proposes for belief as being divinely revealed is drawn from this single deposit of faith.”

Mindful of Christ’s words to his apostles: “He who hears you, hears me”, the faithful receive with docility the teachings and directives that their pastors give them in different forms.

Catechism of the Catholic Church 85-87
Okay, this is actually a great example. The first paragraph says the task of interpretation of the Word of God (scripture and tradition) is for the Church alone. Does this in any way disagree with what I stated about where ultimate authority lies?

The second paragraph says that while the “Magisterium is not superior to the Word of God” it’s still the only one who is going to tell you what it says.

So ultimately where does the real authority lie?
 
Can you elaborate on the dividing factions and disagreements within Rome, in light of the whole church using one catechism that sets forth our beliefs.

Also, how is my comment about ALL protestants false? Each new denomination that springs up disagrees with the other two that began last week all proclaiming to be “bible churches.”
  1. Dividing factions and disagreements of today or throughout history?
  2. Well that’s like me saying something about ALL catholics. Good or bad it will be a false statement.
 
  1. Dividing factions and disagreements of today or throughout history?
You decide since you know so many.
  1. Well that’s like me saying something about ALL catholics. Good or bad it will be a false statement.
I see where this went. Maybe I should have said ALL protestant DENOMINATIONS disagree with each other, instead of saying each and every single protestant individual.
 
By the way, the Sungenis vs. White debate on Purgatory is currently FREE on Sungenis’ website right now. When you order, just pick “Print Order Form” as payment method and a download link will be sent to you.
 
Well, as you stated, that is your position. However, I don’t hold to your interpretation. Who’s right? You or me? Or would you appeal to a fallible decision on your part to accept the interpretations given by your church to claim infallibility?
Well, then, when 2 of us disagree, what should we do?

What do the Scriptures say?

What do the Scriptures say is the pillar and foundation of Truth?

The Church.

And what Church is the only one that claims to be the infallible guardian of God’s revelation?

You can go ahead and follow your man-made, fallible pastor’s interpretations of Scripture, and I’ll go with the one that claims infallibliity.

(And remember, *fallible–*by definition–means that it’s going to be wrong. Going. To. Be. Wrong.)
I would say that God used those HE authorized (Peter, Paul, James, etc.) and led them to make HIS decisions on the matter.
Well, that is very Catholic of you to say that! 👍
However, this doesn’t mean that there would be others with the same authorization, but rather, what was authorized is now inscripturated. The church upholding these truths. There is no reason for me to take their actions any further than what is now written.

CM
Do you have a Scripture verse for this, CM, or is this another extra-biblical, man-made tradition that you’ve endorsed?
 
… I addressed human fallibilities and acknowledged that truth belongs to the unbiased seeker, via the Holy Spirit (from whence truth comes) through the only valid form of truth available, aka the Scriptures.
Sorry! But this doesnt justify your claim regarding truth being revealed in the debate. For one, they were both using Scripture, Second, they both used information outside of Scripture, and lastly the possibility remains that they are both wrong. Nice try, though…
Therefore, it is fallacious to ask “who demonstrated truth” but rather “what is the Holy Spirit saying?” If one wants to proceed than one must resolve the dilemma before asking the question.
Its not clear to me that there is a dilemma - what dilemma are you talking about? 🤷
In addition, what is it that you think the HS said in the debate? Lastly, how do we(you and us) verify that your answer to the previous question is truly of the HS?
That’s the problem with many on this forum. They ask the question but fail to substantiate their position before asking the question.
Yes - that is exactly what I am accusing you of! You continue to claim that the Holy Spirit leads the sincere seeker to the truth but fail to account for all the sincere truth seekers who end up with mutually exclusive positions on the faith. I think you like the general idea of the HS leading us to truth without dealing with the mundane reality of HOW EXACTLY that happens in the lives of individual believers and why there are so many contrary beliefs among those genuine truth seekers who are called to the “…one faith, one hope…”.

Blessings!
 
Well, then, when 2 of us disagree, what should we do?

What do the Scriptures say?

What do the Scriptures say is the pillar and foundation of Truth?

The Church.
However, being the “pillar and foundation of truth” doesn’t mean that she infallibly interprets the truth. Considering this is a matter of interpretation, your dilemma persists.
And what Church is the only one that claims to be the infallible guardian of God’s revelation?
Well, you said it: “What Church is the only one that CLAIMS to be…” Claiming to be doesn’t mean that she is “…the infallible guardian of God’s revelation.” Why would you think so?
You can go ahead and follow your man-made, fallible pastor’s interpretations of Scripture, and I’ll go with the one that claims infallibliity.
Mine isn’t any more infallible than yours, even if yours claims it is. All it proves to me is that YOU have decided to choose to believe that they are. Is she infallible because you’ve chosen to believe she is? Can you see your dilemma? Amazing!
(And remember, *fallible–*by definition–means that it’s going to be wrong. Going. To. Be. Wrong.)
Which proves you simply abide by the dilemma. Stating that your’s is right and mine is wrong doesn’t prove anything. It just shows that you’ve chosen to believe your’s is.
Well, that is very Catholic of you to say that! 👍
Well, you’ve isolated the part you wanted to believe. Yet, my words, in context, were…

I would say that God used those HE authorized (Peter, Paul, James, etc.) and led them to make HIS decisions on the matter. However, this doesn’t mean that there would be others with the same authorization, but rather, what was authorized is now inscripturated. The church upholding these truths. There is no reason for me to take their actions any further than what is now written.

Clearly, not “very Catholic.” 😉
Do you have a Scripture verse for this, CM, or is this another extra-biblical, man-made tradition that you’ve endorsed?
No, I don’t. It’s just the obvious progression of God-breathed Scriptures as the only viable form of truth. Other then that we wind up back in square one with you claiming one thing and I another. Yet, who’s right and who’s wrong? You still haven’t answered the question.

CM
 
Sorry! But this doesnt justify your claim regarding truth being revealed in the debate. For one, they were both using Scripture, Second, they both used information outside of Scripture, and lastly the possibility remains that they are both wrong. Nice try, though…Its not clear to me that there is a dilemma - what dilemma are you talking about? 🤷
You’re still not getting it. The dilemma is in determining the truth, whether in the debate or in general. You will say one thing and I will say another. Who is right and why? You will say because you have an infallible interpreter and I will say that YOU’VE chosen to believe you have infallible interpretative. Therefore, you have a dilemma proving that you do. By the way, please keep my statements within it’s context.
In addition, what is it that you think the HS said in the debate? Lastly, how do we(you and us) verify that your answer to the previous question is truly of the HS?
Well, I would go with the proper exegesis of the Scriptures within the debate, rather than second-guess what the Holy Spirit is saying. James White making the firmer argument. I believe that is pretty evident. I don’t think we need the Holy Spirit to guide us into what is so evident 😉
Yes - that is exactly what I am accusing you of! You continue to claim that the Holy Spirit leads the sincere seeker to the truth but fail to account for all the sincere truth seekers who end up with mutually exclusive positions on the faith.
I think you like the general idea of the HS leading us to truth without dealing with the mundane reality of HOW EXACTLY that happens in the lives of individual believers and why there are so many contrary beliefs among those genuine truth seekers who are called to the “…one faith, one hope…”.

Blessings!
Okay, let’s grant you that for a moment (not that I buy into your argument considering you don’t seem to be following along), but what about you. HOW do you know that your position on this matter is correct? How do you know with INFALLIBLE certitude that your decision to follow Roman Catholicism on this matter is correct? WHAT entails that “…one faith, one hope…”? Let me see you answer these questions without resorting to circular arguments.

CM
 
By the way, the Sungenis vs. White debate on Purgatory is currently FREE on Sungenis’ website right now. When you order, just pick “Print Order Form” as payment method and a download link will be sent to you.
It seems you have to throw in the kitchen sink to get it. I mean one has to register and give everything from their phone number to their address to get it. I think I’d rather buy it. White has it on DVD (part of the debate on justification). A little pricey, but it’s a video.

CM
 
James White has no authority whatsoever to even interpret Scripture. No one left him in charge. I think I will stick to the Rock that Jesus built the Church on and his successors.
LOL!! :rolleyes:

CM
 
It seems you have to throw in the kitchen sink to get it. I mean one has to register and give everything from their phone number to their address to get it. I think I’d rather buy it. White has it on DVD (part of the debate on justification). A little pricey, but it’s a video.

CM
Ok, I recommend you do that. I just listened to it tonight. White used the same Greek-word-for-suffer-loss argument in that debate as well. I won’t try to taint your opinion of the debate with further analysis.
 
Ok, I recommend you do that. I just listened to it tonight. White used the same Greek-word-for-suffer-loss argument in that debate as well. I won’t try to taint your opinion of the debate with further analysis.
Actually, I already have it and listened to it some time back. It’s pretty bad quality though. I thought I could get something a bit higher in quality. As for the “suffer loss” piece, I don’t think we can hang our hat on it by singling it out. The context of the verses do not support the typical Catholic assertions for purgatory and, regardless of the debate, I’ve already gone through the verses in 1 Corinthians, exegeted them thoroughly, looked for its historical understanding, and do not see the Catholic interpretation as valid.

CM
 
I thought it was funny listening to him as well!!
That’s a funny little red herring. However, I was laughing at your implication that White has no authority to interpret Scripture. He does, I do, we all do.👍

CM
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top