Starbucks Take a Hit

[Reuben_J]

I don’t patronize Starbucks because they monetarily support a myriad of social issues antithetical to my moral beliefs.Besides,their coffees isn’t very good either

They are customers related and if customers don’t come, their business suffers. Might as well, just to teach them a lesson as business outlets not to involve in partisan politic. Half of those out there may not agree with their politic.

 

[7_Sorrows]

The thing I find most offensive about Starbucks is the taste of its coffee

I agree. I have never liked their coffee. Too strong and bitter for my taste.

 

[M-Dent]

Starbucks always could have targeted hiring LEGAL IMMIGRANTS, if they felt it was their moral imperative and they made capable employees. Nobody would object to that imperitive.

That they adopted and publicized this policy only when the National discussion focused on ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS was just a lame attempt to pander to the left. It was a shallow PR move that deserves a hand slap.

 

[adamhovey1988]

I agree. I have never liked their coffee. Too strong and bitter for my taste.

I like going to non-chain (or small chain) coffee organisations better. But if I can brew it at home (and believe you me, I do), then I’m good. I went to University here in South Carolina and there’s a Starbucks on campus…. As if students didn’t have enough to worry about.

 

[Sarcelle]

McDonald’s coffee tastes better to me and it’s a lot cheaper.

True