State of grace and timing of death

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peony
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Peony

Guest
I asked this in the AAA forum but haven’t gotten an answer yet. If God loves us so much that He wants us to be with Him always in heaven then why would He not take a soul when they are in a state of grace if He knows that later they would fall and be damned? According to Catholic teaching, it seems a bit like Russian roulette.
 
I would say it’s because God wants us to remain faithful ‘all the way’ so to speak. In that, He doesn’t want us to ever lose our grace. If we did, and later died, it wouldn’t be God’s fault. Only we can remove our own grace. I think you’re talking about predestination here…which i don’t buy. It’s obvious God sees outside time, because He created it; therefore he can see our actions from 20 years ago, and 20 years ahead. That doesn’t mean, however, that he has destined us to Hell or Heaven, because He wills that all go to Heaven. However, it’s conditioned on our response to His grace that we grow in grace, and do not lose it. When you look at it this way, it’s clear that it’s not some sort of ‘Russian Roulette’. It’s not a game that God engages us in. God knows when we all shall die, grace or no grace. It’s up to Him to give us the grace we need (which He always does), and it’s up to us to remain faithful to the grace He grants us.

On a separate note, I believe God judges us on our whole lives, not just a part, or the latest part.
 
I’m not sure if this is equivalent to a strong form of predestination, but to me it absolutely appears to be like Russian Roulette, with many many rounds in the chamber at worst, in fact, we simply can’t know the probability we face (from the perspective of the final outcome).
…why would He not take a soul when they are in a state of grace if He knows that later they would fall and be damned?
Yes, and he also let’s us reproduce, perhaps knowing that some will have children who will one day find themselves in hell. To me it is a great horror that I could be involved in the procreation of a person who eventually suffers for all eternity.

Those children who die early also get a free pass, not to the highest place in heaven perhaps, but a free pass out of hell, which is very valuable in my opinion given the fact that hell seems pretty easy to get to once you are an age of reason, and furthermore because we don’t know the true chances we actually have of avoiding the horror of hell.

It appears God works in mysterious ways. I don’t think your question can be answered other than to have faith that God is perfectly just, and that we should pray and hope for the salvation of all, trusting in God that he will work things out in the end, hopefully with the odds in our favor, (i.e, the majority or more getting to heaven).
 
I

Those children who die early also get a free pass, not to the highest place in heaven perhaps, but a free pass out of hell, .
This isn’t a theologically sound opinion that you hold. The Catholic Church trusts in the mercy of God, that unbaptized babies won’t be condemned to hell for eternity, but the Church doesn’t say that they are guaranteed salvation.

For all the Church knows, perhaps God does condemn unbaptized babies to hell…hence ’ trust in Gods mercy ’ disclaimer. Really, no one knows. 🤷
 
This isn’t a theologically sound opinion that you hold. The Catholic Church trusts in the mercy of God, that unbaptized babies won’t be condemned to hell for eternity, but the Church doesn’t say that they are guaranteed salvation.

For all the Church knows, perhaps God does condemn unbaptized babies to hell…hence ’ trust in Gods mercy ’ disclaimer. Really, no one knows. 🤷
If we assume that God condemns unbaptized babies to hell, then the whole edifice of Catholicism falls apart since that God would be condemning people who don’t in any meaningful way have free will.
 
If we assume that God condemns unbaptized babies to hell, then the whole edifice of Catholicism falls apart since that God would be condemning people who don’t in any meaningful way have free will.
I actually think Zatzat is right since the Church also teaches that one must be baptized to be saved, with the disclaimer that God CAN work outside of the Sacraments.

Now that makes it sound as if we’re throwing away the significance of Baptism, but we’re not; it’s more complex than that.
 
If we assume that God condemns unbaptized babies to hell, then the whole edifice of Catholicism falls apart since that God would be condemning people who don’t in any meaningful way have free will.
Produce the evidence that trumps your Catechism, that states that the Catholic Church guarantee’s that babies receive automatic salvation. Now that you’ve learned what the Catholic Church holds as truth, I’m curious to know if the whole edifice of Catholicism has fallen apart? :rolleyes:

CCC

1261 As regards children who have died without Baptism, the Church can only entrust them to the mercy of God, as she does in her funeral rites for them. Indeed, the great mercy of God who desires that all men should be saved, and Jesus’ tenderness toward children which caused him to say: "Let the children come to me, do not hinder them,"64 allow us to hope that there is a way of salvation for children who have died without Baptism.

I’m an Atheist and yet I know this. 🤷
 
Produce the evidence that trumps your Catechism, that states that the Catholic Church guarantee’s that babies receive automatic salvation. Now that you’ve learned what the Catholic Church holds as truth, I’m curious to know if the whole edifice of Catholicism has fallen apart? :rolleyes:

CCC

1261 As regards children who have died without Baptism, the Church can only entrust them to the mercy of God, as she does in her funeral rites for them. Indeed, the great mercy of God who desires that all men should be saved, and Jesus’ tenderness toward children which caused him to say: "Let the children come to me, do not hinder them,"64 allow us to hope that there is a way of salvation for children who have died without Baptism.

I’m an Atheist and yet I know this. 🤷
I’m not arguing that the Catholic Church is right; I’m arguing that if the Catholic Church believes that unbaptized infants could really be condemned then their understanding of God is really weird.
 
I’m not arguing that the Catholic Church is right; I’m arguing that if the Catholic Church believes that unbaptized infants could really be condemned then their understanding of God is really weird.
Is it really?

When one is all knowing and has foreknowledge of all things past present and future, is it beyond God to be able to decide their place for eternity?
 
Is it really?

When one is all knowing and has foreknowledge of all things past present and future, is it beyond God to be able to decide their place for eternity?
Meh, I guess not. But that God may as well kill everybody right off the bat.
 
Meh, I guess not. But that God may as well kill everybody right off the bat.
I’m confused as to what you’re implying here.

The Catholic God IS omniscient and omnipotent. So he is “that God”. However, being that He knows everything thayt has occurred and will occurred, I think he’s in the best position to make the best decision.
 
I asked this in the AAA forum but haven’t gotten an answer yet. If God loves us so much that He wants us to be with Him always in heaven then why would He not take a soul when they are in a state of grace if He knows that later they would fall and be damned? According to Catholic teaching, it seems a bit like Russian roulette.
The wages of sin are death, right? And we all have to put up with the prision of flesh and the desires of such due to Eve’s shenanigans (or whatever concept you wish to use to express how humanity fell away from God).

Say a bank robbing paedophile pro-abortion atheist gets hit by a drunk driver. They die. They go to Hell. Is it their fault they died? No, it’s the drunks. If God had reached down and gave said atheist CPR to prevent their non-state of grace soul evac’ing their body He could have voided the need for faith of those around the body, especially if said body was in a real state, like guts all over the road sort of state. Yes, if said atheist made it alive to hospital and was on life support God could have in His own reasoning caused a miracle for them. But generally God allows biology to take the reigns. Just like He won’t interfer with the choices of others affecting our lives.

Of course, this is just what I’ve come to understand of the whole concept of free will, nature rebelling against God and certain physical laws that are in place to protect our faith and ability to chose God freely without duress.

The only safe bet we have is if we are constantly in a state of grace, or constantly trying for that state of grace.

Yet, then we have to mull over the whole “near death experiences” that some claim has happened to them, albeit, most of these happened in such a way that only the near deathee’s word is the only proof.

Its kind of a moot point to argue over what God’s thinking about all this or why He’s doing what He’s doing. But it is fun. 😃
 
If we can really fall into serious sin, then we simply haven’t yet been perfected into the beings God is seeking to draw us to be- that is, beings who love Him with their whole heart, soul, mind, and strength and their neighbor as themselves. He’s not a capricious being, prepared to let someone perish on a technicality. He’s patient and kind and loves unconditionally, willing no one to perish, providing grace to all. And if He were otherwise, He wouldn’t really be worth our attention anyway.
 
I’m confused as to what you’re implying here.

The Catholic God IS omniscient and omnipotent. So he is “that God”. However, being that He knows everything thayt has occurred and will occurred, I think he’s in the best position to make the best decision.
If God would kill a person because he knew they were going to sin, why not simply kill everybody? It’s functionally the same thing.
 
Thanks everyone for your responses.

I’m having a hard time embracing what is taught…that God loves us beyond measure, wants us to always be with Him yet doesn’t seem to take all steps necessary to make sure we are with Him forever. If a person is in a state of grace then falls out of grace by Catholic definition and dies before repenting and goes to hell because of that…where’s the logic in that? God knows what is going to happen before it happens.

St. Rita prayed for God to kill her sons before they avenged their father’s death by murdering someone and He did it so He has taken lives to prevent a fall from grace. So, why some people and not others? As Catholics teach it (and I’m Catholic) a baptized baby goes to heaven thru no merit of their own yet we don’t know what happens to an unbaptized baby. Or the deathbed confession of a terrible person whose life inflicted pain on many will get to enjoy heaven someday yet a good Catholic who struggled their whole life to do good maybe misses a Mass and dies and we believe they probably went to hell?
I’m not getting it.

Aren’t there any good arguments out there to refute this? I know I’m not the first person to have problems with this and I’m hoping you all can point me in the right direction.
 
If we assume that God condemns unbaptized babies to hell, then the whole edifice of Catholicism falls apart since that God would be condemning people who don’t in any meaningful way have free will.
This is the perfect preface to the very fact that God of course can, but would not condemn babies to Hell, or Limbo, or whatever. My mother had a stillborn, and for years was in deep depression over it…often over the fact that that she wasn’t baptized, and that in some way, she (her baby) was futile to God (according to this certain way of thinking). Some people hold fast to this teaching; that is, no baptism, no salvation, no Heaven.

But babies do not have the free will of articulate thought, hence, they are not responsible for their plight; and free will is, before baptism, the very foundation of faith; the very beginning of man’s story with God. Marked with original sin, yes, but not guilty of it in their own right, because they haven’t had the opportunity to choose good or evil, or to even think for him/herself. Because stillborn or miscarried babies are victims of early death not within their or anyone’s control, and often, in abortion, the victims of murder, they are saved through the merits of Jesus Christ, who ‘loved the children’.

We need baptism to be saved. Those who don’t even get the chance to see life itself, are the most innocent of all, and are saved through that very fact.
 
Thanks everyone for your responses.

I’m having a hard time embracing what is taught…that God loves us beyond measure, wants us to always be with Him yet doesn’t seem to take all steps necessary to make sure we are with Him forever. If a person is in a state of grace then falls out of grace by Catholic definition and dies before repenting and goes to hell because of that…where’s the logic in that? God knows what is going to happen before it happens.
The logic is that you are wrong when you say God doesn’t seem to take all the necessary steps…what else could God have done? Of course, he could give wretched sinners clear cut proof of himself, like an apparition (such as to St. Francis; a terrible sinner until Jesus appeared to Him; he ended one of the Church’s great saints). Of course, God won’t cause a miracle all the time: “You shall not put the Lord, your God, to the test.” But God is always after our hearts, in mystical fashion, calling to us in probably millions of tiny ways. John Paul II made a great point in his book Crossing the Threshold, that people want concrete proof of God, but refuse to look to Jesus, who is the ‘image of the invisible God’. In Jesus, what has God not done? Unless people are in situations like death before they execute free will, or people who live good lives but have never heard or ever been taught the teachings of Christ, people are always open to the truths held in the Church. And God is always open to them, calling each one into mystical union.
The fact is that God isn’t the cause of our losing grace; if we had grace, and lost it, it’s our fault…and if we die without grace, it’s still our fault. God takes us when He chooses. As far as a good explanation from Christ Himself on the matter, I’d suggest the parable of the house on sand, and the house on rock. The house on sand withers and breaks and falls. The house on rock survives the storm; a story, to me, of people who have grace, and lose it, and of those who keep it firm.
St. Rita prayed for God to kill her sons before they avenged their father’s death by murdering someone and He did it so He has taken lives to prevent a fall from grace. So, why some people and not others? As Catholics teach it (and I’m Catholic) a baptized baby goes to heaven thru no merit of their own yet we don’t know what happens to an unbaptized baby. Or the deathbed confession of a terrible person whose life inflicted pain on many will get to enjoy heaven someday yet a good Catholic who struggled their whole life to do good maybe misses a Mass and dies and we believe they probably went to hell?
I’m not getting it.
Aren’t there any good arguments out there to refute this? I know I’m not the first person to have problems with this and I’m hoping you all can point me in the right direction.
The only arguement there is: God alone is judge. We shouldn’t judge, but it’s God who is always Just Judge. Why quarrel over who gets Heaven or not? We should rather pray for them, but worry about OUR own salvation. It’s up to God everyone’s eternal destiny. Let’s worry about ours and everybodies…but not assume some extra knowledge; God alone is our judge.
The Church Doctrine of Purgatory pretty well sums up your confusion here, I think.
Lets say that a murderer, who has known for some time that He was wrong, and was sorry to his victims, was dying, and at the impulse of the Holy Spirit, says “Lord, forgive me. I’m sorry. I believe in You, and in Your Son. Please don’t damn me, but in your mercy, grant that I may see You in your glory.” If the man be sincere, perhaps God will give him over to purgatory, to be purified until he ‘pays the last penny’, as Christ himself put it, for his crimes.

And, on the other hand, if a devout Catholic decides randomly one day, at the impulse of the Devil, “I don’t feel like going to Church. I’m going to sleep in for once.” Later that day, this person is killed in a car crash. Perhaps God, observing the former devoutness of the person, and considering their unopportune time of death before repenting, hands him over to purgatory to be purified of this sin which happened at a final point in his life.

And, finally, consider a baby stillborn, or aborted. This baby, not having the opportunity for articulate thought or execution of free will; having no knowledge of life, of good or evil, of Christ or even it’s own existence, but marked with original sin. This baby, being in such circumstances, could pass through a short stint in purgatory (for the soul has no age), and be found in Heaven.

These are questions of God’s mercy. If a serial killer, about to be caught for his crime, says “God, please help me! I’m sorry!”, but says this because of a moment of desperation, and not of true conversion, and then is shot by a policeman, then he’s certainly not going to be counted among God’s elect in Heaven. But again, these are questions of God’s mercy, which we can ponder, but can’t understand. We know that God is both Just Judge and Merciful Savior, but life is a test…think of it like this: we can either pass or fail. If someone gets a passing grade of a B,C, or D, he’s given to purgatory (according to the 3 Levels or Purgatory teaching). If one passes with a grade of A+, then this person will immediately go to Heaven. If someone rejects knowledge and fails, F and lower, they go to Hell. I hope this clears up things atleast a bit for you. God Bless!
 
Your analogy to getting into heaven with passing grades actually makes sense to me but that’s not what the Church teaches, as far as I know, which is where I get stuck.

I’m not looking for God to give miracles. What seems contradictory to me is this scenario… A good Catholic at one time experinces disillusionment with life and the Church, doesn’t become a bad person but commits mortal sins according to the Church which puts this person at serious risk of hell according to the Church. If God loves us so much why would He not take that person at the time when he would make it to Heaven? And if we just rely on God’s mercy and not what the Church teaches then why aren’t we all Protestants?
 
Produce the evidence that trumps your Catechism, that states that the Catholic Church guarantee’s that babies receive automatic salvation. Now that you’ve learned what the Catholic Church holds as truth, I’m curious to know if the whole edifice of Catholicism has fallen apart? :rolleyes:

CCC

1261 As regards children who have died without Baptism, the Church can only entrust them to the mercy of God, as she does in her funeral rites for them. Indeed, the great mercy of God who desires that all men should be saved, and Jesus’ tenderness toward children which caused him to say: "Let the children come to me, do not hinder them,"64 allow us to hope that there is a way of salvation for children who have died without Baptism.

I’m an Atheist and yet I know this. 🤷
This absolutely does not say that babies automatically receive salvation. It merely hopes that they do, but trusts God to make the best decision.
 
If God would kill a person because he knew they were going to sin, why not simply kill everybody? It’s functionally the same thing.
Because some people in life have a role to play beyond that. They might repent, or they might be used by God to influence other people.

Only God knows what the future will hold.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top