Thank you both for psoting again and i have talked to a priest at the local seminaryabout a couple of questions. Would you consider it wiser to join the seminaryout of high school (8years) or to go to college first and obtain a degree such as accounting (4years of college plus six years at the seminary)
That’s something you should discuss between yourself, your spiritual director (and if you don’t have one of those - get one) and the vocations director.
Generally speaking, there are supporting opinions in favour of both. Joining the seminary early can get you more years of formal formation.
On the other hand, there is an argument to be made that those who do enter the seminary after high school can lack some real world experiences that those coming in with a degree can already possess (such as things you won’t learn at a seminary - such as accounting, or in my own case engineering). I know that sometimes people will object to this out of fear someone may “lose” their vocation, but I think that if someone does have an authentic vocation to priesthood it will still be there and someone will still feel it in 4 years.
My other thought is in terms of practicality and backup plans. Not everyone who is called to enter the seminary will be ordained, that’s a fact. If someone were to enter the seminary out of high school and later discern out, the experience will be good but they will (practically speaking) be left with just a partial or (possibly full) philosophy degree. Philosophy degrees aren’t that useful unless you want to go on to theology or become a professor. My own feeling is that this reality can inhibit the discernment of a man and possibly cause them to continue in seminary even if it becomes obvious to them that they are not called to the priesthood (the last thing we really want is unhappy priests who felt they were trapped in and forced) because they are unsure of what to do next.
If someone enters the seminary with a degree in something they were personally interested in (business, science, engineering, education, whatever it may be), then there is less personal pressure on that man to go through to completion, and if he does it is almost guaranteed to be his own free, personal choice. And that is because they know they could have done something else (and maybe they did succeed in something else), but still chose in favour of priesthood. It also means that if they discern that they are not called, they still have that first degree and they know they can continue in whatever field it was in (they are more free to discern out, if that is where they are called, because they do not need to be as stressed about their future).
That’s just my own personal opinion though, others may give theirs too.