C
chosunhoon
Guest
I saw the following posted on a blog (who is not Catholic) and I was wondering if someone would care to comment:
Upon Columbus’ “discovery” of the New World, the Pope proclaimed that, as “king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions” (as the triple tiara signifies) and “governor of the world”, he actually had owned the Americas all the while, and the Natives had been living on his land. They now needed to pay rent. This is the reason that Spanish soldiers engaged in the brutality that they did in order to obtain their treasures from their mines- because they were collecting rent for the Pope. 90% of the gold obtained went to the Pope; the other 10% went to the ruling king. Incidentally, not once was a ship carrying the Pope’s gold attacked by pirates; they only attacked vessels carrying payment for the king. (Isn’t it interesting that the skull and crossbones is the flag of the Jesuit Order, as well?)
So how much of this could be true?
-Jason
Upon Columbus’ “discovery” of the New World, the Pope proclaimed that, as “king of heaven and of earth and of the lower regions” (as the triple tiara signifies) and “governor of the world”, he actually had owned the Americas all the while, and the Natives had been living on his land. They now needed to pay rent. This is the reason that Spanish soldiers engaged in the brutality that they did in order to obtain their treasures from their mines- because they were collecting rent for the Pope. 90% of the gold obtained went to the Pope; the other 10% went to the ruling king. Incidentally, not once was a ship carrying the Pope’s gold attacked by pirates; they only attacked vessels carrying payment for the king. (Isn’t it interesting that the skull and crossbones is the flag of the Jesuit Order, as well?)
So how much of this could be true?
-Jason