ThisOne:
But I am not the only one who’s saying it. There’s plenty of references to it in the psychological literature, of which you may not be aware, but here’s just one laywoman’s account. Search for “crossed” on this page:
cakenyc.com/cbsolitaire.html
Here’s what it says, and I agree with you that it is disgusting:
One time, by using the seam on the crotch of my jeans and carefully crossed legs, I “pleasured myself” in the middle of a physics lecture by swinging my legs. I guess the laws of gravity can really get a girl hot!!
This is supposedly a woman who intentionally pleasured herself by using the crotch of her jeans, probably scooting in just such a position for maximum effect. This is apples and oranges. And I hope you do not mistsake this for anything “scientific”, as if this even might hint that there is more scientific evidence out there to support your position. There’s more scientific evidence that men are friskier because of the external nature of their organ, and by your standards, they should hardly move their legs at all, lest they accidentally “masturbate”.
You cannot make an comparison about anyone innocently fidgeting and who could be wearing anything and someone who is intentionally saying, “Ohh, I think I’ll use the stiff threaded crotch of my jeans to have a good time” and who deliberately positions herself in order to do it. I know that you’re saying that it is possible to accidentally turn yourself on because it has happened to yourself. I’m glad you recognized a problem and I will acknowledge it based on what you say. I won’t dare to “disagree” with what you state is a fact about yourself. But even if it’s possible in some cases, it’s certainly not what most women have in mind when they’re just kicking out a little extra energy. Some just have high metabolisms and can’t sit completely still without fidgeting with something.
I’m just saying, it’s absurd to assume this must happen to everyone, based upon the nasty blog article you posted where it’s a whole other thing what this woman is doing, and maybe you’re reading too much secular media where sex is overemphasized, and where women are made to feel ashamed if they’re NOT turned on by the caricatures of ever-frisky “women” ever-present in entertainment media. The same media who wants us all to believe X Y and Z really really turn women on, when we know better.
ThisOne:
Your personal comments about me continue to be unwarranted. The closest thing I said to anything directly about you personally was this, and it was very clearly not accusing you of anything: “I think with a little self-observation, you will discover that I am not mad.”
I said “I think,” and your response could easily have been, “I think you are mistaken” instead of the choices you continue to make to continually characterize me personally.
I still do not see that I’ve made any personal attack on your character. Please, could you be more specific? It was never my intention and although I don’t know why you think so, I’m sad that you think that was my intention. I’m just pointing out some flaws I see in your claim, is all.
I think you might be too sensitive to the word “absurd” when I say that I do think it’s absurd to say, “Women should be discouraged” and “It’s a form of masturbation” based on no evidence other than what shaking your leg does to yourself. And I’m not going to say, “This One, I
disagree with what you think I’m doing when I shake my leg”, because
“disagree” and
“agree” are terms used in matter of
opinions, not facts. You don’t
get an
opinion on what’s happening in my own personal observation when I know what the
facts about me are. Only I know, and you don’t, and I’m saying for a
fact that you’re wrong about at least some women, if not most.