Studies and Meditations on this Sundays Scripture Readings: September 8, 2013

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fidelis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Fidelis

Guest
“If anyone comes to me without hating his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.
Whoever does not carry his own cross and come after me cannot be my disciple".

To help us prepare for this coming Sunday, here are the readings, studies and reflections for this coming Sunday’s Scripture readings. **This Sunday is the 23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time.
**
Here are the Scripture readings from the U.S. Catholic bishops website.

My own weekly study on the Sunday Readings can be found here at my website.

Here are three short audio reflections on the readings by Sister Ann Shields, Dr. Scott Hahn, and Fr. Robert Barron.

Scripture scholar Fr. Francis Martin’s video meditations on the Sunday Scripture readings can be found here.

Further study resources for the Readings: *St. Charles Borromeo Bible Study *can be found here, Catholic Matters can be found here, the Catena Aurea (“Golden Chain”) of St. Thomas Aquinas can be found here, and the Haydock Commentary can be found here.

Please consider supporting those who provide these free resources.

Discussion, questions and charitable comments are always welcome. Have a blessed week!

http://kevingriggs.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/carrying-cross.jpg
 
Thanks so much Fidelis!

This Gospel reading has always presented challenges to me, the resources you provided are excellent.

I’ll be sharing the message with others this weekend.

Be Blessed!
 
Compeccator said:
Thanks so much Fidelis!

This Gospel reading has always presented challenges to me, the resources you provided are excellent.

I’ll be sharing the message with others this weekend.

Be Blessed!
Click to expand...
You’re welcome! I’ll be adding more resources to the thread later. 🙂
 
I am Lector Sunday. Very helpful preparation(s). Thank you.

Peace
 
***From the Navarre Bible Commentary

First Reading: From: Wisdom 9:13-18*​

Wisdom essential for discerning God’s will
-------------------------------------------------------------**
[13] For what man can learn the counsel of God?
Or who can discern what the Lord wills?
[14] For the reasoning of mortals is worthless,
and our designs are likely to fail,
[15] for a perishable body weighs down the soul,
and this earthly tent burdens the thoughtful mind.
[16] We can hardly guess at what is on earth,
and what is at hand we find with labour;
but who has traced out what is in the heavens?
[17] Who has learned thy counsel, unless thou hast given wisdom
and sent thy holy Spirit from on high?
[18] And thus the paths of those on earth were set right,
and men were taught what pleases thee,
and were saved by wisdom.”
*
Commentary: *

9:13-18. These verses conclude the survey of wisdom, which as we saw is sometimes identified with the “holy Spirit” that God sends from on high (v. 17). The last verse says that thanks to wisdom men are saved (v. 18), for through it they have learned to understand God’s purposes. Left to himself, man cannot attain wisdom because his reasoning powers are quite limited and he is often side-tracked (v. 14); moreover, the cares of life get in the way (v. 15); in the last analysis, man is really quite limited (v. 16). In speaking like this, the writer is not saying that we cannot discover truth; all he means is that God’s purposes, the Wisdom of God, cannot be discovered by man on his own. But now that the Word has become man, we can manage to know the mystery of God: “Because God did not wish to be known any longer through the image and sign of living wisdom to be found in created things, as happened in former times, it was his will that Wisdom itself would become flesh, and that, having been made man, he would suffer death on the cross; so that in all the days to come, everyone who believed in him could be saved through their faith in the cross. In former times, the Wisdom of God stamped his seal on all created things – and the presence of his sign is the reason why we called them ‘created’ – to reveal himself and so make his Father known. But later, this same Wisdom, who is the Word, was made flesh, as St John says; and having overcome death and saved the human race, he revealed himself in a clearer way and, through himself, revealed the Father” (St Athanasius, Contra arianos, 2, 81-82).

Verse 15 seems to contain the Platonic idea of the body being the prison of the soul, but the sacred writer does not think that the soul pre-existed the body: all he is doing is making the point that the physical part of man blinds him to spiritual things. St Paul will expand on this when he talks about how his members contend with his “inmost self”: “Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?” (Rom 7:24).
Source: “The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries”. Biblical text from the
Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries by members of
the Faculty of Theology, University of Navarre, Spain.

Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland, and
by Scepter Publishers in the United States. We encourage readers to purchase
The Navarre Bible for personal study. See Scepter Publishers for details.
 
***From the Navarre Bible Commentary

From: Philemon 9–17*​

A Plea on Onesimus’ Behalf (Continuation)
-----------------------------------------**
[9] Yet for love’s sake I prefer to appeal to you–I, Paul, an ambassador and now a prisoner also for Christ Jesus–[10] I appeal to you for my, child, Onesimus, whose father I have become in my imprisonment. [11] Formerly he was useless to you, but now he is indeed useful to you and to me.* [12] I am sending him back to you, sending my very heart. [13] I would have been glad to keep him with me, in order that he might serve me on your behalf during my imprisonment for the gospel; [14] but I preferred to do nothing without your consent in order that your goodness might not be by compulsion but of your own free will.

[15] Perhaps this is why he was parted from you for a while, that you might have him back for ever, [16] no longer as a slave but more than a slave, as a beloved brother, especially to me but how much more to you, both in the flesh and in the Lord. [17] So if you consider me your partner, receive him as you would receive me.

NOTE: Verse 11 does not appear in this Sunday’s Reading.
Commentary:*

8-12. At this point St Paul gives his main reason for writing—to intercede for Onesimus. Typically, he appeals to Philemon’s charity, rather than demanding his cooperation (cf. 2 Cor 1:23), and to support this appeal he refers to his (Paul’s) being “an old man” and a “prisoner” for love of Jesus Christ (v. 9).

The Apostle’s generosity of spirit is plain to see: in spite of being imprisoned he is self-forgetful and he uses every opportunity that presents itself to win converts–as was the case with Onesimus; and now he intercedes on his behalf. If once he was “useless” to his master, Onesimus can now be very “useful”; there is here a play on words, because the name Onesimus means “useful”: it is as if he were saying that maybe Onesimus did not formerly live up to his name, but now he does; he has been very useful to Paul and now that he is going back he will also be useful to Philemon, who should receive him as if he were the Apostle himself (v. 12).

We should never have fixed ideas about people; despite mistakes and shortcomings, everyone can improve and, with God’s grace, undergo a true change of heart.

Continued…
 
The New Testament writings clearly show that the first Christians’ apostolate extended to all sectors of society with the result that Christians were to be found everywhere. St John Chrysostom points this out as follows: “Aquila worked at a manual wade; the lady who sold purple ran a workshop, another [Christian] was in charge of a gaol; another a centurion, like Cornelius; another was sick, like Timothy; another, Onesimus, was a slave and a fugitive; yet none of them found any of t his an obstacle, and all shone for their holiness–men and women, young and old, slaves and free, soldiers and civilians” (“Hom. on St Matthew”, 43).

13-14. This is another example of the Apostle’s typical refinement. Although his first idea was to keep Onesimus with him to help him during his imprisonment, he prefers that he who has the force of law on his side (Roman law, in this instance) should freely decide what action to take (cf. his approach to making collections: 2 Cor 9:7).

In line with the teaching of Christ and his Apostles, the Second Vatican Council “urges everyone, especially those responsible for educating others, to try to form men and women with a respect for the moral order and who will obey lawful authority and be lovers of true freedom–men, and women, who direct their activities with a sense of responsibility, and strive for what is true and just in willing cooperation with others” (“Dignitatis Humanae”, 8).

St Paul’s refinement was not inspired only by reasons of friendship nor was it a mere tactic: he wants people–in this case, Philemon–to come to free personal decisions, for freedom is a great gift which God has given to every person. “If only we lived like this, if only we knew how to imbue our behavior with generosity, with a desire for understanding and peace! We would encourage the rightful independence of all. Everyone would take a responsible approach to the tasks that correspond to him in temporal matters” ([St] J. Escriva, “Christ Is Passing By”, 124).

15-16. At this point Paul’s thinking becomes exceptionally theological and incisive. What at first sight could have been seen as something bad–Onesimus’ running away–can now be viewed in another light, the sharper light of divine providence: God can draw good out of evil, for “in everything, God works for good with those who love him” (Rom 8:28); he has allowed this incident t o happen so as to give Onesimus the chance to discover the Christian faith.

Therefore, Philemon should now recognize him as a brother, for faith in Jesus Christ makes us all children of the same Father (cf. Gal 3:27- 28; Eph 6:9). “Look at Paul writing on behalf of Onesimus, a runaway slave; he is not ashamed to call him his child, his very heart, his brother, his partner. What can I say?”, St John Chrysostom asks; “Jesus Christ lowered himself to the point of making our slaves his brothers. If they are brothers of Jesus Christ, then they are also our brothers” (“Hom. on Philem”, 2, ad loc.).

Due to this teaching slavery gradually died out. The teaching of the Church’s Magisterium has contributed to a growing realization that all workers have innate dignity and rights as men and as sons and daughters of God. In an early encyclical of modern times Leo XIII called on employers to see that “it is truly shameful and inhuman to misuse men< BR>as though they were mere things designed just to be used in the pursuit of gain”, and reminded them of their duties never “to look upon workers as their bondsmen but to respect in every man his dignity and worth as a man and a Christian” (“Rerum Novarum”, 16).

Continued…
 
Christianity, then, elevates and gives a new dignity to interpersonal relationships, thereby helping produce changes and improvements in social structures. Every Christian insofar as he can should contribute to bringing these changes about, but the methods used to do so must always be moral. Neglect to play one’s part in social reform could even constitute a grave sin, a “social” sin against the virtue of justice.

John Paul II teaches that “the term ‘social’ applies to every sin against justice in interpersonal relationships, committed either by the individual against the community or by the community against the individual. Also ‘social’ is every sin against the rights of th e human person, beginning with the right to life and including the life of the unborn, or against a person’s physical integrity. Likewise ‘social’ is every sin against others’ freedom, especially against the supreme freedom to believe in God and adore him; ‘social’ is every sin against the dignity and honor of one’s neighbor. Also ‘social’ is every sin against the common good and its exigencies in relation to the whole broad spectrum of the rights and duties of citizens. The term ‘social’ can be applied to sins of commission or omission–on the part of political, economic or trade union leaders, who though in a position to do so do not work diligently and wisely for the improvement and transformation of society according to the requirements and potential of the given historic moment; as also on the part of workers who through absenteeism or non-cooperation fail to ensure that their industries can continue to advance the well-being of t he workers themselves, of their families, and of the whole of society” (“Reconciliatio Et Paenitentia”, 16).

17-21. Paul identifies himself with Onesimus because they share the same faith–and Paul is an extremely generous person. Here we can clearly see his great charity which leads him to love everyone much more than is his strict duly. “Be convinced that justice alone is never enough to solve the great problems of mankind. When justice alone is done, do not be surprised if people are hurt: the dignity of man, who is a son of God, requires much more. Charity must penetrate and accompany justice because it sweetens and deifies everything: ‘God is love’ (1 Jn 4:16). Our motive in everything we do should be the Love of God, which makes it easier for us to love our neighbor and which purifies all earthly love and raises it on to a higher level” ([St] J. Escriva, “Friends of God”, 172). It is not surprising, then, that the Apostle s hould ask Philemon to charge it to his account if Onesimus has wronged him or owes him anything (v. 18). And as if to confirm this commitment with affection and good humor he as it were signs a docket promising to pay any charge there may be. However, he immediately goes on to remind Philemon that if they worked out their accounts Philemon would be found to be in debt to Paul, because it was due to Paul that he became a Christian (v. l9). On this account Paul feels that he can ask him to forgive Onesimus: that sign of love and affection would really do Paul good in his present circumstances. But, he goes on to say (it is a suggestion that delicately respects Philemon’s decision) that he hopes Philemon’s obedience will lead him to do “even more” (v. 21). As suggested in the Introduction to this letter he is probably hoping that he will set Onesimus free. In the eyes of the law Onesimus is still a slave; but as a Christian he is already a free man.

St Paul does not directly ask for Onesimus’ freedom, although he does hint at it, encouraging his old master to set him free but leaving it up to him to decide (and thereby merit). He reminds Philemon how generous he, Paul, was towards him (vv. 18-19), in the hope that Philemon will reciprocate. “This is a repetition of the same testimony he expressed earlier in his letter”, St John Chrysostom points out; “‘knowing that you will do even more than I say’: it is impossible to imagine anything more persuasive, any more convincing argument than this tender regard of his generosity which St Paul expresses; Philemon cannot but agree to his demand” (“Hom. on Philem, ad loc.”).​

Source: “The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries”. Biblical text from the
Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries by members of
the Faculty of Theology, University of Navarre, Spain.

Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland, and
by Scepter Publishers in the United States. We encourage readers to purchase
The Navarre Bible for personal study. See Scepter Publishers for details.
 
***From the Navare Bible Commentary

Gospel Reading - From: Luke 14:25-33*​

Conditions For Following Jesus
------------------------------**
[25] Now great multitudes accompanied Him (Jesus); and He turned and said to them, [26] “If any one comes to Me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be My disciple. [27] Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after Me, cannot be My disciple. [28] For which of you, desiring to build a tower, does not first sit down and count the cost, whether he has enough to complete it? [29] Otherwise, when he has laid a foundation, and is not able to finish, all who see it begin to mock him, [30] saying, `This man began to build, and was not able to finish.’ [31] Or what king, going to encounter another king in a war, will not sit down first and take counsel whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? [32] And if not, while the other is yet a great way off, he sends an embassy and asks terms of peace. [33] So therefore, whoever of you does not renounce all that he has cannot be My disciple.”
*
Commentary:*
  1. These words of our Lord should not disconcert us. Love for God and for Jesus should have pride of place in our lives and we should keep away from anything which obstructs this love: “In this world let us love everyone,” St. Gregory the Great comments, “even though he be our enemy; but let us hate him who opposes us on our way to God, though he be our relative …]. We should then, love, our neighbor; we should have charity towards all–towards relative and towards strangers—but without separating ourselves from the love of God out of love for them” (“In Evangelia Homiliae”, 37, 3). In the last analysis, it is a matter of keeping the proper hierarchy of charity: God must take priority over everything.
Continued…*
 
This verse must be understood, therefore, in the context of all of our Lord’s teachings (cf. Luke 6:27-35). These are “hard words. True, hate' does not exactly express what Jesus meant. Yet He did put it very strongly, because He doesn't just mean love less,’ as some people interpret it in an attempt to tone down the sentence. The force behind these vigorous words does not lie in their implying a negative or pitiless attitude, for the Jesus who is speaking here is none other than that Jesus who commands us to love others as we love ourselves and who gives up His life for mankind. These words indicate simply that we cannot be half-hearted when it comes to loving God. Christ’s words could be translated as `love more, love better’, in the sense that a selfish or partial love is not enough: we have to love others with the love of God” ([St] J. Escriva, “Christ Is Passing By”, 97). See the notes on Matthew 10:34-37; Luke 2:49.

As the Second Vatican Council explains, Christians “strive to please God rather than men, always ready to abandon everything for Christ” (Vatican II, "Apostolicam Actuositatem, 4).
  1. Christ “by suffering for us not only gave us an example so that we might follow in His footsteps, but He also opened up a way. If we follow that way, life and death becomes holy and acquire a new meaning” (Vatican II, “Gaudium Et Spes”, 22).
The way the Christian follows is that of imitating Christ. We can follow Him only if we help Him bear His cross. We all have experience of suffering, and suffering leads to unhappiness unless it is accepted with a Christian outlook. The Cross is not a tragedy: it is God’s way of teaching us that through sin we can be sanctified, becoming one with Christ and winning Heaven as a reward. This is why it is so Christian to love pain: “Let us bless pain. Love pain. Sanctify pain…Glorify pain!” ([St] J. Escriva, “The Way”, 208).

28-35. Our Lord uses different examples to show that if mere human prudence means that a person should try to work out in advance the risks he may run, with all the more reason should a Christian embrace the cross voluntarily and generously, because there is no other way he can follow Jesus Christ. * “`Quia hic homo coepit aedificare et non potuit consummare!* He started to build and was unable to finish!’ A sad commentary which, if you don’t want, need be made about you: for you possess everything necessary to crown the edifice of your sanctification–the grace of God and your own will.” ([St] J. Escriva, “The Way”, 324).
  1. Earlier our Lord spoke about “hating” one’s parents and one’s very life; now He equally vigorously requires us to be completely detached from possessions. This verse is a direct application of the two foregoing parables: just as a king is imprudent if he goes to war with an inadequate army, so anyone is foolish who thinks he can follow our Lord without renouncing all his possessions. This renunciation should really bite: our heart has to be unencumbered by anything material if we are able to follow in our Lord’s footsteps. The reason is, as He tells us later on, that it is impossible to “serve God and Mammon” (Luke 16:13). Not infrequently our Lord asks a person to practice total, voluntary poverty; and He asks everyone to practice genuine detachment and generosity in the use of material things. If a Christian has to be ready to give up even life itself, with all the more reason should he renounce possessions: If you are a man of God, you will seek to despise riches as intensely as men of the world seek to possess them" ([St] J. Escriva, “The Way”, 633). See the note on Luke 12:33-34.

Besides, for a soul to become filled with God it must first be emptied of everything that could be an obstacle to God’s indwelling: “The doctrine that the Son of God came to teach was contempt for all things in order to receive as a reward the Spirit of God in himself. For, as long as the soul does not reject all things, it has no capacity to receive the Spirit of God in pure transformation” (St. John of the Cross, “Ascent of Mount Carmel”, Book 1, Chapter 5, 2).​

Source: “The Navarre Bible: Text and Commentaries”. Biblical text from the
Revised Standard Version and New Vulgate. Commentaries by members of
the Faculty of Theology, University of Navarre, Spain.

Published by Four Courts Press, Kill Lane, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland, and
by Scepter Publishers in the United States. We encourage readers to purchase
The Navarre Bible for personal study. See Scepter Publishers for details.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top