I’m more trusting of mormons who studied their way into Catholicism, like BartBurk, than those who say they “studied their way out of Mormonism” and ended up Catholic. The latter seems almost disrespectful to Catholicism.
Truthsave, you were never LDS, were you?
Because when you speak about my faith, I always feel like you’re talking about another church entirely.
And when you suggest that a mormon has to be deprogrammed and to study anti-Mormon literature in order to join the Catholic church, that suggests that Catholicism itself lacks the power to save.
The problem is that Mormons are taught from the time they’re born that no one outside of the church is really trustworthy, at all. In fact, non-Mormons are always viewed to be ‘anti-Mormon’ and are held in suspicion that they may turn on them at any time, for any reason. It’s a kind of ‘induced paranoia’ to keep them from leaving the church. They tend to stick together with other Mormons, and don’t really socialize very much with ‘outsiders’, so that just reinforces their independence from the rest of the world, because they have all they need within their own community. Not that it’s a bad thing to have such a tight-knit community, but it does isolate them and insulates them from the ‘contamination’ of outsiders and their ‘wrong ideas’. It shows in almost every post from LDS in response to anything else posted, that they consider to be negative toward Mormonism in general, or against individual Mormons, specifically. That engrained attitude (what I occasionally call the ‘Mormon persecution complex’), that’s learned through negative reinforcement, leads them to question everything that’s said by anyone on the outside, especially if it’s contrary to what they believe is true about their faith.
They’re also taught that anyone or anything that disagrees with their faith, is not worthy to even bother thinking about. LDS are discouraged from reading anything about their own church from any source other than LDS ‘official’ materials. Everything else should just be taken with a grain of salt or completely ignored as lies made up by ‘anti-Mormons’. What they don’t always realize, is that the leaders of their church have made many changes in much of their historic records and beliefs to make it seem more palatable to both LDS, and people in the rest of the world. They’ve also covered up many other things, or made excuses for anything that they couldn’t just sweep under the rug. On the other hand, they’re taught to ‘learn’ about other faiths, only so they can more easily find ways to convince possible converts that what they believe is wrong, and Mormonism is right.
What most of the LDS converts here are saying, is that in the process of either searching for the truth, or in trying to debunk someone else’s beliefs, they have found themselves realizing that what they were always taught to believe, might not really be true at all. Some people are strong enough in their own beliefs in Mormonism to ignore those pangs of doubt, and brush them off as the devil trying to deceive them, but others begin to realize that the truth might just be that Mormonism is not really true. That has to be a cold slap in the face for anyone that was a dedicated LDS, that had never had any doubt about their faith in their entire life, before. I wouldn’t want to be in their position, but I went through my own period of searching when I was in my late teens and early 20’s. Then, I had a ‘rude awakening’ that convinced me that I was walking where angels fear to tread, because I was looking for truth in all the wrong places (really bad places). If you want to call it a ‘burning in the bosom’ that convinced me of the truth, that’s fine. But, it wasn’t just a ‘burning in the bosom’ that I saw with my own eyes. :bigyikes: