Stumbling blocks for early Jewish Christians?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ora_et_Labora_1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
O

Ora_et_Labora_1

Guest
Perhaps someone learned in Scripture can help me out here. There are two passages in the OT that I see particularly as being stumbling blocks to Jews that would want to approach Christ: (1) God says that the person who hangs on the tree is cursed; (2) God forbids blood to be eaten/drunk.
  • Christ was crucified. How did the early Church get around (1)?
  • Christ said that to have everlasting life one would have to drink of his blood. How did the early Church get around (2)?
Thanks in advance.

Pax tecum!
 
That was certainly the conundrum that the early Jews had to face.

I would add a number 3. The early Jews were looking for a Messiah such as Daniel, chapter 7 - namely one coming down out of the clouds in glory and conquering all of Israel’s enemies.

So, how did they overcome it? The Holy Spirit opened up their minds, and they allowed the Truth to enter into their hearts. In other words, their hearts were circumcised!
 
Perhaps someone learned in Scripture can help me out here. There are two passages in the OT that I see particularly as being stumbling blocks to Jews that would want to approach Christ: (1) God says that the person who hangs on the tree is cursed; (2) God forbids blood to be eaten/drunk.
  • Christ was crucified. How did the early Church get around (1)?
  • Christ said that to have everlasting life one would have to drink of his blood. How did the early Church get around (2)?
Thanks in advance.

Pax tecum!
I think Jesus WAS cursed, cursed with the sins of the world. Yeah, I think that is exactly the point.

Yes, there were a lot of controversies for centuries over the Blood of Christ, and still are in many places. I think the essence of the explanation are the words of Christ, Himself.

Recall, that in the OT, the prohibition about eating blood was tied up with the pagan sacrifice of the animals, in the first place. The consumption of blood was tied up with the idea of sharing the living essence of the sacrificial animal, which were pagan practices. In its own context, that prohibition was highlighting the outlines of the new monotheistic beliefs that God was revealing.

In early times, the Christian faith was very spiritual, and the sacrifices of animals and related superstitions were immensely superceded and replaced. The early Church fathers taught that the consecrated bread and wine were transformed into the same Body and Blood of Christ, as instituted by Christ at the “last supper” (not a biblical term).

The OT was written in Hebrew and Hebrew didn’t have words for expressing certain things. So often, two words were used to represent the idea that couldn’t be expressed just so. For example, in Genesis, God creates the heavens and the earth – the technical term is “merism” – to represent “everything.”

Hebrew does use a collective term “man” to represent both male and female. There are other examples, that just don’t come to mind right now.

That is the basis or something close to the basis for the Church later defining that the consecrated bread and wine – each – are the “body, blood, soul, and divinity of Jesus Christ.” Recall that the practice of the Eucharist preceded the writing of the New Testament. The belief was there, under that inspiration of the Holy Spirit, from the beginning, from the time of the “last supper.”
 
If you’re interested in learning more about Jewish/Christian theological issues among the Early Christians, you might want to try reading Justin Martyr’s Dialogue with Trypho. Trypho was a well known Jew living in the Greek world, and Justin was a Syrian Greek philosophy student who converted to Christianity and taught Christianity as a philosopher. (Thus allowing him to evangelize openly and in public.) Justin lived from about AD 110-165. (When the tolerance of the philosopher Crescens for being out-argued ran out, Justin was reported as a Christian, his bible study/philosophy class was raided and arrested, and everybody in it also got martyred because they refused to sacrifice to Caesar as a god.)

Dialogue with Trypho is a sort of pleasant literary presentation of an apologetics debate. Neither side minces words – philosophers debated hard, and both Jews and Christians at that time were trying hard to gain converts from each other and the pagan public – but a lot of issues are covered.

You can hear it in audiobook podcast format at archive.org:
archive.org/search.php?query=Trypho%20(collection%3Aourmedia%20OR%20mediatype%3Aourmedia)%20AND%20-mediatype%3Acollection%20AND%20firstTitle%3AD

Or you can just read the public domain translation:
ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.viii.iv.i.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top