J
JDaniel
Guest
G!:Based on this definition of sufficient grace, that it causes us to be receptive (Something I perceive as strangely intrinsically efficacious), does the church teach that all are given sufficient grace? THerefore are all made “receptive” to efficacious grace? And are all then saved?
I think the dispute is ongoing, i.e., the Church has not made a pronouncement in favor of any of the several contentions. Until it does, we are permitted to believe either of them. There is a fourth or fifth contention, called, I believe, syncretism which is supposed to be synthesis, or sorts, of the two schools of thought: Molinism and Thomism.
One school of thought says that we are all given sufficient grace, which is a form of efficacious grace, but, in order to remain free in will, we may reject it.
I believe that is correct.Or is sufficient grace the grace GOd gives everyone, and if they respond to it, then he gives them more grace?
Again, I believe that is correct. However, remember, nothing is definitive yet, as far as I know.But they can’t respond without prevenient grace!
Well, that would seem to be the case from our more modern perspective.I cannot see sufficient grace in this context as anything except insufficient
You may choose either side. You might want to take a look at the Catholic Encyclopedia Online and read about Predestination.although I would be happy to revise my thinking if someone can at least tell me what it’s sufficient FOR since it isn’t doing anything…
God bless,
jd