I would think that the Pope himself would receive anyone as they are as Christ did., not sure of his advisers.
So you know for sure that Christ ‘received people as they are’? That if a woman approached Him wearing an immodest outfit He just smiled and chatted with her, and never even a “I do not condemn you, but go forth and sin no more?”
As a devout Jewish person, even though we hear of Christ’s DISCIPLES eating the wheat in a field, we don’t hear of Him doing it. . .and in fact, we hear Him telling the people to obey the scribes and Pharisees when they are teaching.
I think a lot of what you say comes from the very modern American principle (which in turn came from the careful policy of Oliver Cromwell and his Roundheads) which deliberately tries to ‘blunt down’ any kind of distinction between persons.
Now I’m not saying that say Lady Diana Spencer and Lady Gaga are (despite having ‘lady’ in their names) to be seen as ‘royal’ and ‘commoner’, as if just by being ‘noble born’ Diana is ‘better than’ Lady Gaga.
BUT I’m also not saying that they are ‘just the same’. They aren’t.
They have similarities but they also have differences.
And there are plenty of people in this world who are, if you will, ‘better’ than we, whether it is by virtue of their hard work (the people who for example fight for this country, who are dedicated public servants, etc.), by virtue of their talent (Yo-yo Ma is better than the cellist for Podunk U), Mother Teresa is better than most of us by virtue of her charity, and the Pope is better than we by virtue of his being in charge of all of us Catholic Souls as the Vicar of Christ.
And we
show our respect for those who have a reason to deserve our respect.
There were a lot fewer opportunities for improper dress at the time of Christ than there are today. Let’s face it, the majority of the people wore the very same type of clothing --tunic and robe and sandals. There weren’t all that many ‘geegaws’. There weren’t all that many fabrics available. There weren’t all that many colors available. So whether a man was wearing a linen robe, somewhat worn, but robes were long and tunics could be ‘folded’ to cover worn spots. . .or a woman was wearing a coarse hand-woven cloth . . . they looked pretty much the same.
Christ’s own clothing was not ‘poor’. His tunic in fact was made so well that instead of cutting it into shares, the soldiers played dice for it. So Christ knew that there was no need not to make ‘the best’ of what there was available. I’m sure his own wood working skills were impeccable. He did His best and He expected that of others. He certainly forgave those who didn’t do their best
if they were sorry for their failures but He wouldn’t just let wrongs ‘pass by’.