L
leemarsh2010
Guest
Would it be sinful of a Catholic to buy a Playstation because of Sony’s production of The Da Vinci Code movie?
Would it be sinful to buy milk at your local supermarket if they also sell contraceptives?Would it be sinful of a Catholic to buy a Playstation because of Sony’s production of The Da Vinci Code movie?
I think this is a totally different situation. Milk is a necessary product…a Playstation isn’t.Would it be sinful to buy milk at your local supermarket if they also sell contraceptives?
Catholic writer Mark Shea tells an anecdote about a college bull session among students at Central Washington University over The Da Vinci Code. “Even if it’s just fiction,” a student opined, “it’s still interesting to think about.”
To which another student replied: “Your mother’s a whore.” And then, to the first student’s stunned incredulity, he added, “And even if that’s just fiction, it’s still interesting to think about.”
That’s not a good response at all.I see no obligation to boycott Sony, but it might be meritorious to do so.
By the way, I think everyone should check out Decent Film Guide’s review of The DaVinci Code because it deals with the damnable silence of reviewers willing to pan the film but pretend they don’t notice the flagrant anti-Catholicism in it. It also ends with one of the best responses I have heard to the It’s-Just-Fiction canard:
Sure it is. It deftly dismantles the ridiculous assertion that fiction is beyond giving offense by making a valid comparison.That’s not a good response at all.
Sorry, but milk is not an essential product. More essential than a playstation, yes, but your argument is still flawed since you don’t need milk to survive.I think this is a totally different situation. Milk is a necessary product…a Playstation isn’t.
To the OP, I also think that you should buy a used PS2.
It doesn’t dismantle anything. It sounds like someone giving a snarky response to a simple statement. From where I am sitting, which is not as a fan of the book, that guy sounds like a jerk.Sure it is. It deftly dismantles the ridiculous assertion that fiction is beyond giving offense by making a valid comparison.
Furthermore, do the people advocating that stance thoroughly check everything they buy, since the world is made up of conglomerates these days? What if a homosexual stockholder is making millions off stocks in the company? What if they produced the product in partnership with a company you don’t agree with the policies of? These things could apply to the companies who make anything in your house. Do you check every lamp? Every placemat? Chances are that unless you live in a box you own dozens of products made by companies whose business decisions you wouldn’t always morally agree with.Sorry, but milk is not an essential product. More essential than a playstation, yes, but your argument is still flawed since you don’t need milk to survive.
Why in the world is God going to care if you buy a playstaton or a gallon of milk jsut becuse there happens to be some sort of bad thing also located in the store…
The example is solid. One could I suppose execute it in a less snarky way.It doesn’t dismantle anything. It sounds like someone giving a snarky response to a simple statement. From where I am sitting, which is not as a fan of the book, that guy sounds like a jerk.
Not really - you remove a used playstation from the market so someone else will buy a new one instead of the used one. It’s still part of the overall demand for Playstations.that is a tough one…
Just to be safe buy a used one!! then Sony doesn’t get the money
Please don’t start petty arguments about the examples used. I was simply responding to MrIrish’s example of milk.Sorry, but milk is not an essential product. More essential than a playstation, yes, but your argument is still flawed since you don’t need milk to survive.
Why in the world is God going to care if you buy a playstaton or a gallon of milk jsut becuse there happens to be some sort of bad thing also located in the store…