Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation connections to Planned Parenthood

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillyHW
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
:confused:
goodknight439 said:
You do not need to convince me Rosalinda. I agree with you. I was objecting to flogging of the dead horse with those like KarenNC. Although, I can’t read what karenNC posts as I have placed her on my ignore list. You showed her the smoking gun and she Iam sure she refuted it. I am glad to see efforts like yours helped Jea9.

Peace.
Click to expand...
I have repeatedly shown my reasons for my position and I stand by them. They are there for examination by any who chose to look critically at the material presented for themselves and see what the studies and scientific community support and what they do not, including rather than ignoring research that has been done over the past 20 years.🤷

I can lead that horse to water, but I cannot make him drink. Each horse has to do that for himself.
 
GoodKnight, I wasn’t aware you are no longer able to see KarenNC’s posts. Now I understand what the “ignore list” is. :o
 
KarenNC said:
:confused:

I have repeatedly shown my reasons for my position and I stand by them. They are there for examination by any who chose to look critically at the material presented for themselves and see what the studies and scientific community support and what they do not, including rather than ignoring research that has been done over the past 20 years.🤷

I can lead that horse to water, but I cannot make him drink. Each horse has to do that for himself.
Click to expand...
What you cant do is lead the horse to raw sewage and try to convince him its water. Roalsinda has done an excellent job of showing there is overwhelming evidence there is a link.
 
Rosalinda said:
GoodKnight, I wasn’t aware you are no longer able to see KarenNC’s posts. Now I understand what the “ignore list” is. :o
Click to expand...
Your posts have been awesome. Of course those who support abortion will never accept that there can be any harm from this evil procedure but you have done a great job of keeping those who who have not studied the issue from swallowng pro-abortion propoganda.
 
Returning to post 49 by KarenNC:
[sign]Just for a more complete picture, this was a study done on rats and the findings published in 1983 by Russo, et al.

“Preliminary results in our laboratory suggest that a correlation between human breast tissue and rat mammary gland findings is possible. (155, 156).”

Possible. Not definite. There has been over two decades of additional research since that study that must be considered as well. Scientific knowledge is not static.
[/sign]

This response is rather a cavalier dismissal considering not one scientist in attendance at the NCI workshop even refuted the Russo’s breast cancers studies. If someone has developed a more accurate concept on the architecture and biology of the breast in the last “two decades” we would like to see it.
Dr. Russo’s interest in cancer research spans 34 years…
During his tenure at the Michigan Cancer Foundation,** his studies were geared to understand how environmental carcinogens,** such as polycyclic hydrocarbons,** interact with the mammary epithelia of rodents and humans, and what mechanisms are activated for the causation of breast cancer,** one of the leading causes of death in the female population in the Western world. His studies in both rodents and humans have led him to conclude that the carcinogenic potential of a given chemical is in great part modulated by the biological conditions of the target organ, which determine its susceptibility to neoplastic transformation. This seminal work carried out with his talented research team led him to develop new concepts in the understanding of the susceptibility of the mammary land at the time of exposure to a given chemical carcinogen on its binding, DNA repair and tumor incidence,** have influenced the way in which the study of mammary cancer is focused by researchers worldwide** (J Natl Cancer Inst 59: 435, 1977; 61: 1451, 1978; Am J Pathol 96: 721, 1979; Cancer Res 40: 2677, 1980; *Carcinogenesis *2: 1327, 1981).
Click to expand...
fccc.edu/research/labs/russo/joserusso.html
 
Catholic bishops and Cardinals have to become informed about the true mission of the Komen Foundation. Please note they have changed their name because they began contributing to and supporting embryonic stem cell research and lending financial support to alternative lifestyle causes, i.e., the gay and lesbian political organizations and their agendas.

Komen is as much an insidious organization just as is their counterpart, Planned Parenthood. However, just as millions of women still think of Planned Parenthood as an organization that helps poor women obtain health care, millions of people still believe Komen is a rosy pink organization totally dedicated to eradicating breast cancer.

It took years for the general public to buy into the truth about the cigarettes/lung cancer link, so it will take years and perhaps decades for this organization to be brought to its knees. The founder’s ties to Planned Parenthood and their dedication to unholy research and support of deadly lifestyles will eventually be their undoing. But it will take time.
 
Hi everyone. Is the National Breast Cancer Foundation linked in any way, shape, or form to the Susan G. Komen Foundation, Planned Parenthood, or any organization that funds or provides abortions? I ask because I was on The Hunger Site and was looking into what charity they use for their breast cancer donation thing and it said that their charity is the National Breast Cancer Foundation. Could you please help me out? :confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top