Svengoolie tonight: The Evil of Frankenstein

  • Thread starter Thread starter svid2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

svid2

Guest
Pax Christi!

On Svengoolie we’ve got a film I’ve never heard of before: The Evil of Frankenstein (1964). This one has a hypnotist!

Oo-ooh!

Gonna watch with me? I gotta go get munchies, but I’ll check it out!

MeTV, ten p.m. Eastern.

God bless.
 
Sorry, Offbeat Cinema is showing Werewolf of Washington tonite.
 
I watched part of it last night and part of it this morning.

I actually really liked it. When the Hammer Films came out, I wasn’t allowed to go see them because they were considered not appropriate for kids. Now it’s nice to be able to see them.

Peter Cushing is so sincere in whatever character he plays. Roles like those in the Hammer Films could be overacted and look very corny, but Cushing keeps it real and convincing. He’s very handsome. I love the way his clothing always looks so neat, even after he’s slept in straw in a cave! Just like James Bond!

It’s interesting that the film attempted to manipulate our thinking to see Frankenstein as the “good guy” and the Burgermeister and the Chief of Police as the “bad guys.” It’s ridiculous!–Frankenstein robbed graves (eugh!–a despicable crime and sin even today!), murdered people, and created a hulking monster that killed animals and people in its quest for food–yet he’s supposed to be the GOOD guy?!! No way! How stupid do we all look, anyway?

And yes, the Burgermeister was a womanizer who stole Frankenstein’s property after banishing him, and the Chief of Police didn’t seem much better–but they didn’t kill anyone or rob graves. They were just kind of trashy, and they didn’t look as neat and trim in their clothing as Frankenstein did. But definitely not the bad guys.

When we consider the time during which these films were made, and the wide-spread rebellion and distrust of authority, especially the police–well, I think the film was just playing to that feeling among the teenagers and younger adults who probably made up most of the movie audience for Hammer Films. Good PR. And hopefully, the kids cheered Frankenstein and booed the Burgermeister while they were in the theater, but once they got home and were safely in their quiet beds, they recognized that the real villain in the film was Dr. Frankenstein.
 
I watched part of it last night and part of it this morning.

I actually really liked it. When the Hammer Films came out, I wasn’t allowed to go see them because they were considered not appropriate for kids. Now it’s nice to be able to see them.

Peter Cushing is so sincere in whatever character he plays. Roles like those in the Hammer Films could be overacted and look very corny, but Cushing keeps it real and convincing. He’s very handsome. I love the way his clothing always looks so neat, even after he’s slept in straw in a cave! Just like James Bond!

It’s interesting that the film attempted to manipulate our thinking to see Frankenstein as the “good guy” and the Burgermeister and the Chief of Police as the “bad guys.” It’s ridiculous!–Frankenstein robbed graves (eugh!–a despicable crime and sin even today!), murdered people, and created a hulking monster that killed animals and people in its quest for food–yet he’s supposed to be the GOOD guy?!! No way! How stupid do we all look, anyway?

And yes, the Burgermeister was a womanizer who stole Frankenstein’s property after banishing him, and the Chief of Police didn’t seem much better–but they didn’t kill anyone or rob graves. They were just kind of trashy, and they didn’t look as neat and trim in their clothing as Frankenstein did. But definitely not the bad guys.

When we consider the time during which these films were made, and the wide-spread rebellion and distrust of authority, especially the police–well, I think the film was just playing to that feeling among the teenagers and younger adults who probably made up most of the movie audience for Hammer Films. Good PR. And hopefully, the kids cheered Frankenstein and booed the Burgermeister while they were in the theater, but once they got home and were safely in their quiet beds, they recognized that the real villain in the film was Dr. Frankenstein.
Cushing’s Dr. Frankenstein was very different from Colin Clive’s Frankenstein in the Karloff film, wasn’t he? Whereas Clive was full of self-doubt, Cushing has absolute self-confidence in his decisions. He doesn’t do evil for the sake of evil, he just does evil acts to advance the goals of his scientific projects and probably thinks of himself as a good man.

I wonder if he didn’t base his conception of Frankenstein on a post-atomic conception of the scientist? He seems to have a lot more in common with Oppenheimer and Peter Singer than Mr. Wizard. Bernard Quatermass from the BBC series and Hammer films is a slightly less intense version of the same character - the man of science who sees “scientific progress” as the highest moral goal, regardless of the human consequences.
 
Ugh! Missed it. 😦

I love Mr. Cushing. I have several books about him. Got several books on Hammer films and owned the VHS doc Flesh and Blood: The Hammer Heritage of Horror my friend Ted put together.

And any thread that invokes Bernard Quatermass is worth its weight in gold! Y’all sure know how to make a gal happy. 👍
 
I watched part of it last night and part of it this morning.

I actually really liked it. When the Hammer Films came out, I wasn’t allowed to go see them because they were considered not appropriate for kids. Now it’s nice to be able to see them.

Peter Cushing is so sincere in whatever character he plays. Roles like those in the Hammer Films could be overacted and look very corny, but Cushing keeps it real and convincing. He’s very handsome. I love the way his clothing always looks so neat, even after he’s slept in straw in a cave! Just like James Bond!

It’s interesting that the film attempted to manipulate our thinking to see Frankenstein as the “good guy” and the Burgermeister and the Chief of Police as the “bad guys.” It’s ridiculous!–Frankenstein robbed graves (eugh!–a despicable crime and sin even today!), murdered people, and created a hulking monster that killed animals and people in its quest for food–yet he’s supposed to be the GOOD guy?!! No way! How stupid do we all look, anyway?

And yes, the Burgermeister was a womanizer who stole Frankenstein’s property after banishing him, and the Chief of Police didn’t seem much better–but they didn’t kill anyone or rob graves. They were just kind of trashy, and they didn’t look as neat and trim in their clothing as Frankenstein did. But definitely not the bad guys.

When we consider the time during which these films were made, and the wide-spread rebellion and distrust of authority, especially the police–well, I think the film was just playing to that feeling among the teenagers and younger adults who probably made up most of the movie audience for Hammer Films. Good PR. And hopefully, the kids cheered Frankenstein and booed the Burgermeister while they were in the theater, but once they got home and were safely in their quiet beds, they recognized that the real villain in the film was Dr. Frankenstein.
Peter Cushing was attractive? That honestly never occurred to me before (Christopher Lee, perhaps …).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top