T
twf
Guest
In the ancient and medieval Latin Church, as in the Eastern Churches today, provincial, regional and national synods were convened under the presidency of the provincial metropolitan or national / regional primate. Synodality declined in the West over time, but Vatican II restored a semblance of it with the institution of episcopal national conferences. National conferences, however, lack the “teeth” of true synods of old and are under the presidency of an elected, rotating bishop rather than a canonical primate. Were there any discussions in the mid-20th century around restoring the more traditional synodal system? Were any particular arguments presented to justify the more novel approach of conferences? Just curious.