A
AnthonyJ
Guest
Does the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church have latinizations? I think I read it is relatively without them compared to some of the other Eastern Catholic Churches.
Apparently, they did once. There was a recent synodal decision to recover their Syriac roots. It was contested by certain groups of priests and laymen who wanted to maintain some non-Western Syriac traditions (Latin and East Syriac), but they are a minority, IIRC.Does the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church have latinizations? I think I read it is relatively without them compared to some of the other Eastern Catholic Churches.
You are, naturally, absolutely correct on the matter. I got really confused between the two Churches in that thread that sister SJ Thaikattil started several months ago, Sorry for the confusion and thank you for the correction.There are relatively no latinizations in the Syro-Malankara Church - they most mirror their Orthodox counterparts – some people do have devotional attachments to Stations, the Rosary and/or Adoration, but these are recognized as adopted latin customs and practices.
I am not aware of any controversy in the Malankara Catholic Church by Eastern Syriac leaning and Latin leaning priests…
The Syro-Malabar Church is another story – there are multiple factions competing for power despite the clear teaching of their Holy Synod, their Major Arch Bishop and the Holy Father for the Church to regain its authentic East Syriac roots.
Then why did Mar Ivanios invite the deposed Patriarch in to Kerala church so that it will provide a chance for all to give validity to anti Patriarchal faction. Now the Catholicos faction is questioning the validity of the see of Antioch based on this. Also if you can give me the reason for the deposition of Patriarch Ignatius Abdul Messiah.Mr Jose Thomas,
I hope you retract that statement regarding Mar Ivanios - he is considered a Servant of God to Catholics and is expected to be recognizex as a Saint in the near future.
I wonder if you’ve heard about Mar Ivanios from rhetorical sources and propagandists rather than those closest to him - how can a man who left everything behind, including the very building of the Order that he founded and was legally possessor - be called “an opportunist”.
It was the anti-Patriarchal faction of the Malankara Church that decided to designate Mar Ivanios as the bishop in charge of reunion, when the time to actually reunite came, he was standing alone — see the story of Mar Bawai Soro of the Assyrian Church for quite a few similarities, he is also called various terrible names by his detractors.
How can you blame the actions of the Catholicos faction on anyone else. Did the Catholicos faction not exist prior to the invitation of Mar Ivanios?Then why did Mar Ivanios invite the deposed Patriarch in to Kerala church so that it will provide a chance for all to give validity to anti Patriarchal faction. Now the Catholicos faction is questioning the validity of the see of Antioch based on this. Also if you can give me the reason for the deposition of Patriarch Ignatius Abdul Messiah.
Yes, The consecration and invitation were happened before Mar Ivanios joined with Catholic church. Mar Ivanios joined the catholic church in 1920s (last). The invitation of deposed patriarch happened in the last of 1900s. This was done by Mar Ivanios. The thing is that the deposed Patriarch Ignatios Abdul Messiah joined the Catholic church by meeting with the Syriac Catholic patriarch Ignatios Rahmani. Then discussions were going on with the anti patriarchal faction and Catholic church. The anti patriarchal faction decided to join the Catholic church.Dear brother josethomas,
How can you blame the actions of the Catholicos faction on anyone else. Did the Catholicos faction not exist prior to the invitation of Mar Ivanios?
Can someone please explain how a Catholic prelate can consecrate a non-Catholic prelate? Or was the consecration done before Mar Ivanios joined the Catholic communion?
Blessings
How was this done by Mar Ivanios? Did he do so on his own or did the Synod tell Mar Ivanios that he was in charge of such and such a task? I highly doubt he acted without any Synodal vote or decision being given to him as his responsibility.Yes, The consecration and invitation were happened before Mar Ivanios joined with Catholic church. Mar Ivanios joined the catholic church in 1920s (last). The invitation of deposed patriarch happened in the last of 1900s. This was done by Mar Ivanios. The thing is that the deposed Patriarch Ignatios Abdul Messiah joined the Catholic church by meeting with the Syriac Catholic patriarch Ignatios Rahmani. Then discussions were going on with the anti patriarchal faction and Catholic church. The anti patriarchal faction decided to join the Catholic church.
Here is an interesting read of the history of the time of Patriarchs Ignatios Abdul Mesiah and Ignatios Abdullah:I think the real reason for the split in the Syriac orthodox was based on a large sum of money called ‘vattippanam’ which was under the possession of British governement in India. Fearing that the one faction of Syriac orthodox would join the Catholic church, British government by using their judicial court ordered that the owner of the money is the anti patriarchal faction. After getting this large sum of money, their decision to join the Catholic church stopped. But Mar Ivanios sincere with the decision to join the catholic church, joined the catholic church with just another bishop. There formed the Syro malankara catholic church.
Would the Syro-Malankara Catholic church be willing to put itself under the authority of the Syriac Catholic Patriarch of Antioch?Syriac Catholic Patriarch of Antioch, Ignatius Yusuf Younan is visiting the Syro malankara catholic church in these days. The celebration of Malankara catholic unity with catholic church is now going on. He is coming after attending the meting of all the eastern catholic church heads conducted in Rome by Pope.