B
bben15
Guest
At least she genuflects. I rarely ever see a teenager genuflect. They just walk right into the pew.So true. Yesterday at Mass I say a teenage girl texting as she was genuflecting.![]()
At least she genuflects. I rarely ever see a teenager genuflect. They just walk right into the pew.So true. Yesterday at Mass I say a teenage girl texting as she was genuflecting.![]()
Ah, the good 'ole days, when the prayer’s were pure, the holy water font never got moldy and every father wore a belt and wasn’t afraid to take it off and use it.
I could get people on here who will tell you how the altar boys put ground ginger in the incense and choked the whole Church with acrid smoke. The priest just continued like nothing was happening while everyone choked and after Mass he took the can of incense from the shelf in the vestry, looked at it and said, “I didn’t know this stuff went bad!” and threw it in the garbage can.
I know a guy who told us how he used to put a screwdriver in the rope to the church bells - the monk would go up to ring the bells and when the bells got really swinging the screwdriver would get jammed in the pullies. He said he used to bet the other boys that he could get the monk to curse and that is how he would do it. The monk would scream, “You son’s of blankety-blank!” and they would all run away.
Yeah, but that stuff never happened.
-Tim-
This is such a wonderful story and photo. Staged or not, it really did move me, because I have never seen anyone kneel before a Catholic Priest before.From The Deacon’s Bench blog, an amazing and awe-inspiring photo from Life Magazine in 1942 of a priest taking Holy Communion to a sick person in Quebec. Worth meditating upon.
patheos.com/blogs/deaconsbench/2013/09/worth-a-thousand-words-taking-communion-to-the-sick/
http://wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blogs/deaconsbench/files/2013/09/communioncall-575x600.jpg
They are not kneeling before the priest, they are kneeling before Jesus. The OP said that this is a picture of a priest bringing Holy Communion to a sick person.This is such a wonderful story and photo. Staged or not, it really did move me, because I have never seen anyone kneel before a Catholic Priest before.
Me thinks you are a party pooper.I think there is a bit of misplaced nostalgia going on here. As someone who has significant experience in photography, I’m sure not everything in that photo was entirely spontaneous and therefor representative of some perfect devotion and reverence in times past.
The position of the people within the composition are a little too perfect, especially the little girl conspicuously placed in the foreground and the single man facing the camera on the left perfectly balancing the women and children turned to the side on the right. I am sure that the subjects were positioned by the photographer prior to the shot. And how did the photographer get up so high just as all that was happening? Did he happen to be on the roof of a box truck just as the priest arrived and everyone knelt?
Any photographer could see that this photo, if not staged, is not 100% spontaneous. Life photographers were professionals and very good at getting the perfect shot. They did not use digital cameras but used cumbersome equipment and expensive film and so took great pains to make sure that the photo would turn out well. That photo is a little too perfect to be 100% spontaneous and I don’t think it should be seen as representing absolutely perfect devotion of the past vs lack of devotion today.
I could stage the same photo today and it would be just that, a staged photo and nothing more.
-Tim-
I’m sorry. I didn’t mean to say the wrong thing. Please forgive me.They are not kneeling before the priest, they are kneeling before Jesus. The OP said that this is a picture of a priest bringing Holy Communion to a sick person.
Yes, my parents had a sick call set with candles and crucifix available as long as I can remember. After they died, I inherited it from them and have it still today. I recall once as a child being so sick that I seriously considered asking my mom to call the priest, but I didn’t ask, and got better anyway.Things were different back then. I’m old enough to remember when many homes had a personal pew to kneel on (there’s a name for them, but I can’t remember) and the entrance of a priest, not to mention a priest holding the Body and Blood of Christ, was quite an event. It was in my home when a sick family member received the Eucharist. I still remember it 45-odd years later.
An interesting perspective on the idea that this was a staged photo, based on the way things used to be. Many Catholic homes actually had a sick-call kit on hand:
blog.adw.org/2010/08/restoring-greater-reverence-to-sick-calls/
What exactly about Quebec and Ireland at that time was Jansenist in the Church?This all very true, in addition to forcing people to have very large families. If a woman wasn’t either pregnant or nursing during the priest’s annual visit, she had better have a good reason. The Church was very Jansenist at the time. French Canadian families had, for the most part, over 10 kids; 15-18 children wasn’t unheard of. It kept the population dirt poor.
On the flip side though, those large families are what permitted French Canada to survive, through sheer population growth. The irony now is that because of the backlash against the Church, we are reproducing below the replacement rate, and we’re aborting something like over 30,000 babies a year. As a result we’ve had to open the floodgates to immigration. Quebec always favoured francophone immigrants, and in recent years, mostly from Algeria. To the horror of many Quebecers, it turns out they’re mostly Muslim and now there’s a huge backlash against Muslim immigrants.
I live in the thick of it, there are many Muslims in the office I work in. I have no issues with them. They understand the notion of someone having a faith walk much better than the secular Québecois that dumped the Church.
But then the local Church was very much responsible for part of that. There are some parallels between the Quebec and Irish situations (British masters, severe Jansenist local Church, etc.), in fact intermarriage between the French and Irish was common.
I for one would never want to go back to the epoch captured in that picture.
Mulrooney!This all very true, in addition to forcing people to have very large families. If a woman wasn’t either pregnant or nursing during the priest’s annual visit, she had better have a good reason. The Church was very Jansenist at the time. French Canadian families had, for the most part, over 10 kids; 15-18 children wasn’t unheard of. It kept the population dirt poor.
On the flip side though, those large families are what permitted French Canada to survive, through sheer population growth. The irony now is that because of the backlash against the Church, we are reproducing below the replacement rate, and we’re aborting something like over 30,000 babies a year. As a result we’ve had to open the floodgates to immigration. Quebec always favoured francophone immigrants, and in recent years, mostly from Algeria. To the horror of many Quebecers, it turns out they’re mostly Muslim and now there’s a huge backlash against Muslim immigrants.
I live in the thick of it, there are many Muslims in the office I work in. I have no issues with them. They understand the notion of someone having a faith walk much better than the secular Québecois that dumped the Church.
But then the local Church was very much responsible for part of that. There are some parallels between the Quebec and Irish situations (British masters, severe Jansenist local Church, etc.), in fact intermarriage between the French and Irish was common.
I for one would never want to go back to the epoch captured in that picture.
The Church forced people to have large families?This all very true, in addition to forcing people to have very large families. If a woman wasn’t either pregnant or nursing during the priest’s annual visit, she had better have a good reason. The Church was very Jansenist at the time. French Canadian families had, for the most part, over 10 kids; 15-18 children wasn’t unheard of. It kept the population dirt poor.
The Church in Quebec was very different from the church in the rest of Canada and really did control peoples’ lives.The Church forced people to have large families?
That’s just how it was before the pill. My grandmother (not in Quebec) had 12 children but 4 died very young, no one knew why at the time. My other grandmother only had 3. They lived in log cabins, had an outhouse, no electricity, and a well they had to walk out to and pump water. Everyone was the same, and that was the standard of living. My parents didn’t see a chocolate bar or orange until well into their teens when they road in a wagon pulled by horses to town. We of course would not tolerate such conditions today but that’s how it was and I just don’t see how the Church should be blamed. They were all in the same boat. If my parents were alive, they would just be in their 80’s now. This isn’t that long ago.
Yes, it wasn’t unheard of to have the priest point out a family from the pulpit and accuse them of using contraception because they hadn’t had a baby in the last 18 months.The Church in Quebec was very different from the church in the rest of Canada and really did control peoples’ lives.
How far away from the church did they live that the priest would come to them for Baptism? My experience is that the baby was taken to church at the first opportunity, usually the first Sunday after the birth if possible.Just adding one other thing. If a priest came around to visit once a year to baptize a baby that may have been born over the year, that was a blessing. My parents and their neighbors had an official record of their birth, provided by the record keeping of the Church, which entitled them to Social Security when they reached the age. Church records over the centuries has recorded for us our family trees, births, marriages, deaths. Try to resist the idea that he came around for some shady reason. The priest was providing a public service as well as a spiritual one.
So much so that one archbishop felt it necessary to do a billboard campaign to let people know the meaning of the words they use to curse. So removed from the Church are they that this generation doesn’t know the meaning of words like tabernacle, ciboire (ciborium), câlice (chalice), etc., the curse words they learn in the cradle.His parents were extremely religious. However, despite that, all the children that survived to adulthood left the faith, and their now adult children have very little idea of what the catholic church really stands for.
From the “sublime” to the “ridiculous” in 3 generations.
A very strong emphasis on human depravity and that we are all basically evil. Jansenism rose in France at around the time that French Canada was colonized. While not totally Jansenist, the local Church retained elements of it namely the focus on rigor and human depravity.What exactly about Quebec and Ireland at that time was Jansenist in the Church?
Oddly enough the Protestants had much smaller families around here. What did they know that we didn’t?The Church forced people to have large families?
That’s just how it was before the pill.
A backlash to Jansenism isn’t really an unexpected phenomenon. I’ve always found it interesting that, while Jansenism rose and fell rather quickly in France itself, it took deeper root in Ireland and, to a somewhat lesser extent, in Québec.A very strong emphasis on human depravity and that we are all basically evil. Jansenism rose in France at around the time that French Canada was colonized. While not totally Jansenist, the local Church retained elements of it namely the focus on rigor and human depravity.
That’s Original Sin 101. Jansenism is a very specific set of condemned heresies and positions. Did the Church in Quebec teach that grace did not exist outside of the Catholic Church? Did they say that it was impossible to follow the natural law? You may not have liked the culture and tone of the Church in that period but it is another thing to say that they were heretical.A very strong emphasis on human depravity and that we are all basically evil. Jansenism rose in France at around the time that French Canada was colonized. While not totally Jansenist, the local Church retained elements of it namely the focus on rigor and human depravity.