Taking down a poster a sin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TOP
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why don’t we all join together, stop the arguing, and sing a merry tune. Ready? 1.2.3.
Have a Holly Jolly Christmas, it’s the best time of the year, oh my golly have a holly jolly Christmas this year…ummm…kiss her once for me! Hey! Have a Holly Jolly Christmas…
 
Are you saying that the teachings of the Catholic Church are wrong?
i don’t disagree with one single infallible teaching of the Church. I am merely acknowledging some error judgment, and that there are exceptions. Not everything is black and white, and not everything is grey…it’s a judgment call.
 
i don’t disagree with one single infallible teaching of the Church. I am merely acknowledging some error judgment, and that there are exceptions. Not everything is black and white, and not everything is grey…it’s a judgment call.
The Catholic Church Catechism specifically states that it is the authoritative source for Catholic norms & moral behavior. As Catholics, we are OBLIGATED to live our lives by it’s teachings – not some of it or the points that we like but ALL of it. There is no room for a judgment call when the teaching (CCC2408 supported via CCC1753) is very clear.
 
The Catholic Church Catechism specifically states that it is the authoritative source for Catholic norms & moral behavior. As Catholics, we are OBLIGATED to live our lives by it’s teachings – not some of it or the points that we like but ALL of it. There is no room for a judgment call when the teaching (CCC2408 supported via CCC1753) is very clear.
2409- Even if it does not contradict the provisions of civil law, any form of UNJUSTLY TAKING and keeping the property of others is against the seventh commandment.

Nobody has the right to spread error.

Destroying/taking property that doesn’t belong to you isn’t always wrong. Would you allow your children to keep Tarot cards and a Ouija Board if they bought it with their birthday money?
 
2409- Even if it does not contradict the provisions of civil law, any form of UNJUSTLY TAKING and keeping the property of others is against the seventh commandment.
You just further proved my point.
Nobody has the right to spread error.
Show me the where the Catholic Church Catechism, the authoritative source for Catholic norms, gives us the right or instills in us the duty, to have control over somebody else’s property because we disagree with it.
Destroying/taking property that doesn’t belong to you isn’t always wrong. Would you allow your children to keep Tarot cards and a Ouija Board if they bought it with their birthday money?
We’re not talking about what goes on, on YOUR property. You of course have a right over that because it is YOUR property. As a parent, you also have a DUTY to shape the morals of your children. You do NOT have a right to somebody else’s property on somebody else’s property UNLESS they grant you that authority.

If you ASK the property owner if the poster could be removed and they said yes, then you CAN remove it but you can NOT remove it on you own because you do not have a right to do so and doing so would be a sin according to Catholic Church teaching.
 
You just further proved my point.

Show me the where the Catholic Church Catechism, the authoritative source for Catholic norms, gives us the right or instills in us the duty, to have control over somebody else’s property because we disagree with it.

We’re not talking about what goes on, on YOUR property. You of course have a right over that because it is YOUR property. As a parent, you also have a DUTY to shape the morals of your children. You do NOT have a right to somebody else’s property on somebody else’s property UNLESS they grant you that authority.

If you ASK the property owner if the poster could be removed and they said yes, then you CAN remove it but you can NOT remove it on you own because you do not have a right to do so and doing so would be a sin according to Catholic Church teaching.
At this point we’re going to have to agree to disagree. There are always excpetions, but we disagree on that, or at least when exceptions can be granted. Oh well.
 
At this point we’re going to have to agree to disagree. There are always excpetions, but we disagree on that, or at least when exceptions can be granted. Oh well.
Yes there are exceptions but the church decides what those exceptions are – not we as individuals.

If you can’t show me where the official teachings of the Catholic Church supports your opinion, why can’t you admit that your opinion is incorrect and not reflective of official Catholic Church teaching?
 
Yes there are exceptions but the church decides what those exceptions are – not we as individuals.

If you can’t show me where the official teachings of the Catholic Church supports your opinion, why can’t you admit that your opinion is incorrect and not reflective of official Catholic Church teaching?
We have brains, which the Church today encourages us to use. What “official teaching of the Catholic Church” condemns taking down an immoral poster, destroying an emptyl building where children are tortured, etc? The Church does not make an official statement on every single issue in existence.

There are no “official Church teachings” that I’m aware of that support my opinion, but then again, there aren’t any that specifically condemn it either. So my opinion isn’t in line with the current peace at all costs philosophy, so what? Until it’s “offically condemned” I guess I have no problem, do I?
 
We have brains, which the Church today encourages us to use.
No argument there. However, that does not mean we are free to go AGAINST official church teaching.
What “official teaching of the Catholic Church” condemns taking down an immoral poster, destroying an emptyl building where children are tortured, etc?
CCC2408-2409 clearly state that we do not have a right to someone else’s property. We can not take it nor destroy it. We have no right to it even for good reasons (CCC1753).
The Church does not make an official statement on every single issue in existence.
No it doesn’t but it does on this particular point.
There are no “official Church teachings” that I’m aware of that support my opinion, but then again, there aren’t any that specifically condemn it either.
Yes, there is. CCC2408-2409 clearly state that we do not have a right to someone else’s property. We can not take it nor destroy it.
So my opinion isn’t in line with the current peace at all costs philosophy, so what?
First off, it has nothing to do with “peace at all costs philosophy” – it has to do with respect for another person’s property that we do not have a right to. Secondly, if you opinion conflicts with official church teaching, then your opinion is wrong for scripture itself tells us that the church is the fountain of truth and a fountain of truth can not spring forth a line. And thirdly, if your incorrect opinion causes others to sin, then you will share the guilt of that sin. THAT is the “so what”.
Until it’s “offically condemned” I guess I have no problem, do I?
You are ALREADY in disagreement with the Catholic Church Catechism, so I guess you DO have a problem.
 
What makes a poster of the Golden Compass any worse than sexually provocative (yet non-nude) pictures of women on magazines that line the check-out lines of supermarkets? Surely, the sin of lust is more damaging to the American family and American society as a whole than a poster for a fictional movie. Could we justify destroying all those magazines in the supermarkets? Would doing so lead anyone to Christ or His Church?

Yes, it will irk us that such a poster is in a public school, and we should use all LEGAL means possible to try to get it removed, as we should use all LEGAL means to stop the sexual exploitation of women in the media, and all LEGAL means to stop abortion.

When we start breaking laws in the name of God, however, (other than unjust laws that SPECIFICALLY and DIRECTLY violate our faith, as we see the Acts 5:29 exception) then suddenly we are choosing to serve God on our own terms, rather than His, in a manner that actually SINS against Him in that it is against His terms, thereby not truly serving Him, but our own agenda instead.

We are told to make disciples, not to police other people’s property. A good witness in action and word will be much stronger than a, “this violates my faith, and I am therefore above the law in destroying it,” attitude. People don’t often endear other groups of people to them by whining about their own rights.

Why not go to the theater and hand out those mini- New Testaments to everyone who exits that movie? That would be a much stronger witness than drawing publicity to the movie by objecting to it.

Well, this is my opinion and I may be wrong.
 
What makes a poster of the Golden Compass any worse than sexually provocative (yet non-nude) pictures of women on magazines that line the check-out lines of supermarkets? Surely, the sin of lust is more damaging to the American family and American society as a whole than a poster for a fictional movie. Could we justify destroying all those magazines in the supermarkets? Would doing so lead anyone to Christ or His Church?
I have heard orthodox priests advocate exactly that, including Father Larry Richards, Father Donald Calloway, and others whose opinions are widely respected - and who are hardly known as “sixties radicals” - anything but.
 
Since they actually don’t have the right to put up that poster in the first place, I’m not entirely sure if it’s a sin to take it down. But there are other elements which come into play so I’m not entirely sure. I will watch this discussion closely.
 
I have heard orthodox priests advocate exactly that, including Father Larry Richards, Father Donald Calloway, and others whose opinions are widely respected - and who are hardly known as “sixties radicals” - anything but.
Priests, even those that appear to be orthodox ones, can still error. The official position of the church is reflected by the CCC, Canon Law, etc.
 
No argument there. However, that does not mean we are free to go AGAINST official church teaching.

CCC2408-2409 clearly state that we do not have a right to someone else’s property. We can not take it nor destroy it. We have no right to it even for good reasons (CCC1753).

No it doesn’t but it does on this particular point.

Yes, there is. CCC2408-2409 clearly state that we do not have a right to someone else’s property. We can not take it nor destroy it.

First off, it has nothing to do with “peace at all costs philosophy” – it has to do with respect for another person’s property that we do not have a right to. Secondly, if you opinion conflicts with official church teaching, then your opinion is wrong for scripture itself tells us that the church is the fountain of truth and a fountain of truth can not spring forth a line. And thirdly, if your incorrect opinion causes others to sin, then you will share the guilt of that sin. THAT is the “so what”.

You are ALREADY in disagreement with the Catholic Church Catechism, so I guess you DO have a problem.
Let’s not take the CCC out of context:
2409- Even if it does not contradict the provisions of civil law, any form of ***UNJUSTLY ***TAKING and keeping the property of others is against the seventh commandment.

Doing away with something that has no right to exist isn’t wrong, and if you feel that personal property is more important than guarding innocence then…I don’t know what to tell you. Please examine the Whys. Knowing the whys make clear where the exceptions exist. Not something to decide lightly on a whim, but upon examination, the exceptions exist. Laws were made for the good of the people, not people for the laws.
 
Let’s not take the CCC out of context:
2409- Even if it does not contradict the provisions of civil law, any form of ***UNJUSTLY ***TAKING and keeping the property of others is against the seventh commandment.

Doing away with something that has no right to exist isn’t wrong, and if you feel that personal property is more important than guarding innocence then…I don’t know what to tell you. Please examine the Whys. Knowing the whys make clear where the exceptions exist. Not something to decide lightly on a whim, but upon examination, the exceptions exist. Laws were made for the good of the people, not people for the laws.
And show me where do you, as an individual, have a right to judge what is just and what isn’t. Jesus gave us two main commandments – to love one another and not to judge. And what are you doing when you say that something has no right to exist? You are JUDGING … doing exactly what the Son of God told us NOT to do.

Oh, and, as was pointed out earlier, please show us where the apostles ROBBED anything or DESTROYED anything. If they, who were PERSONALLY commissioned by the Son of God, did not perform such actions, what makes you think it would be alright for you to do so?
 
The Catholic Church Catechism specifically states that it is the authoritative source for Catholic norms & moral behavior. As Catholics, we are OBLIGATED to live our lives by it’s teachings – not some of it or the points that we like but ALL of it. There is no room for a judgment call when the teaching (CCC2408 supported via CCC1753) is very clear.
I suspect you realize that latinmasslover is not questioning the authority of the Church on taking down posters but instead is questioning the authority of the Church to have put through the provisions of Vatican II.
 
I suspect you realize that latinmasslover is not questioning the authority of the Church on taking down posters but instead is questioning the authority of the Church to have put through the provisions of Vatican II.
who died and made you the Almighty? Don’t judge my mind bud.
 
who died and made you the Almighty? Don’t judge my mind bud.
All anyone has to do is read your posts on other threads on CAF and they will know exactly what I’m talking about. If I’m wrong the what the heck does the authority of the Church have to do with whether one should take down a movie poster are not?
 
And show me where do you, as an individual, have a right to judge what is just and what isn’t. Jesus gave us two main commandments – to love one another and not to judge. And what are you doing when you say that something has no right to exist? You are JUDGING … doing exactly what the Son of God told us NOT to do.

Oh, and, as was pointed out earlier, please show us where the apostles ROBBED anything or DESTROYED anything. If they, who were PERSONALLY commissioned by the Son of God, did not perform such actions, what makes you think it would be alright for you to do so?
He gave us two commandments, but they are:

LOVE GOD (number ONE)
and to love our neighbor

I’m talking about getting rid of stuff that leads to sin, what is your problem? You sound as though I’m saying to burn every synogogue and and mosque. It’s common sense; I’m not talking about getting rid of what isn’t a preference, but what is sinful and immoral. Since you brought up the Apostles, they didn’t do everything perfectly as you imply. Not everything is recorded on paper, you know. Did they do what I suggest? I can’t answer that. Would they these days if they were around? I can’t answer that either. They weren’t perfect, neither am I. I believe the Lord values souls and lives over inanimate objects/buildings, especially child slaughter houses. You disagree? That’s between you and God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top