Taking questions from Sabbatarians...

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoaoMachado
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi, Lucky,

Can you tell me why you think John would be inclined to mention keeping Sunday as the Day to worship the Lord?

God bless
John did not mention once to keep Sunday as the new Sabbath.

Nothing more, nothing less.
That’s all I say.
 
Hi, PRmerger,

I just can believe anyone would so willfully be tempting Lucky to go off topic by asking logical questions in this hands-on-the-table manner! :eek:

My goodness … next thing you know there will a requirement to actually provide references! 😃 Think about it - if CAF were to disallow unsubstantiated statements …well, maybe just the outrageous ones… some of these topics would never see the light of day - which is at least someting to consider… 😃

Have a great week - Friday we start our vacation… 🙂

God bless
And John doesn’t mention, once, anything at all about the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve, Moses, Noah…

According to your “nothing more, nothing less”…that means that we cannot proclaim this.

Do you see where your paradigm is leading you to, Lucky? :eek:
 
Hi, Lucky,

In no way do I want anyone to break any rules or get into any trouble based on a question I have asked. I certainly respect your response.

Ah, but you can tell me WHY you think you would be going off topic on the Sabbath thread question I asked? It honestly seemed like a logical challenge on why this particular OT command would be observed and similar OT commands not observed.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

God bless
I was penalized for mentioning baptism. you are out of context, you wanted to know about baptism, and now your saying it was about “Sabbath thread question I asked?”.
 
Hi, Lucky,

This is really quite an amazing balancing act you have presented to us - claiming …been said.

A person gets an idea - really does not make any difference what it is …oooooooooh, how …possibly, even resolving it.

The honest scholar looks for every credible … item.

Once the data has … a meaningful criteria.

Personally, … been proven.

Then you publish your results - …actually agree…) and there is an honest discussion.

Admittedly, such a … more light then heat on this topic.

But, there is another option - and, this certainly would be acceptable with me… 😃 … desert of unsubtantiated opinion into the lush garden of thoughtful exchange.

God bless
Hey

There are groups of Christians that was not in the Roman Empire after 300 ad.
There are good records that they kept Sabbath until the 1800, 1900’s. More than 15 centuries.

Here is how I do research.

I assume that Sunday is to be kept in the Bible, then I go and try to prove it.
I take all the verses that mentions the first day of the week, Sunday.

Then:

I assume that Sabbath is to be kept in the Bible, then I go and try to prove it.
I take all the verses that mentions the seventh day of the week, Sabbath.

I put them next to each other and then make a conclusion.

This topic Sunday and Sabbath I have researched for around 2 years.

I have debated Protestants about this, and I got the same respond on this forum.
The 9 times the first day is mentioned, they quote it out of context.
They apply the wrongs things about the wrong law.
Ceremonial law, Moral law, Catholic law.
The Sabbath is mentioned easily more than 150 times.

It seems everything I post here most of the people here will try to attack me for some reason.

I thought all Catholics are united in that the Catholic Church changed the day from Sabbath to Sunday. I even quoted the Catholic Mirror.

And I thought James Cardinal Gibbons was a good source:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gibbons
Sabbath Day / Sunday Commentary
Main article: Lord’s Day

James Cardinal Gibbons stated “You may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify."[1] Sunday is implicit only in that it is the day of the Lord’s resurrection, and was quickly honored as such by the earliest Christians,[2] as it was never made explicit in the pages of Scripture: “For example, nowhere in the Bible do we find that Christ or the Apostles ordered that the Sabbath be changed from Saturday to Sunday. We have the commandment of God given to Moses to keep holy the Sabbath day, that is the 7th day of the week, Saturday. Today most Christians keep Sunday because it has been revealed to us by the Church outside the Bible.”[3] As it was the first day of the week and the day of the Resurrection, it symbolized the New Life in Christ. According to the Catholic Church and virtually all other Christian denominations - Protestant, Orthodox, and Catholic - the ritual elements of the Mosaic law, such as observance of Sabbath or dietary laws, were abrogated by the coming of Christ and the New Covenant; St Thomas Aquinas went so far as to say practicing ritual elements of the Mosaic law was a mortal sin, as it was tantamount to denying that the Messiah had come.[4]
1 James Cardinal Gibbons, The Faith of Our Fathers (1917 edition), p. 72-73 (16th Edition, p 111; 88th Edition, p. 89).
2 Pliny’s Epistle to Trajan
3 Catholic Virginian, October 3, 1947, p. 9, article “To Tell You the Truth.”
4 Aquinas, St Thomas (1981). Summa Theologiae. Christian Classics. pp. 3020.

I think he knew more about this topic than anyone of us.

biblelight.net/keenan.htm
[pg. 174]
Code:
A. The Christian Church has surely a right, which even the Jewish Church possessed.
Q. Where do you find, in the Old Testament, feasts of precept instituted by the synagogue?
A. In the Book of Esther, chap. 9th, and in the last chapter of the Book of Judith.
Q. Have you any other way of proving that the Church has power to institute festivals of precept?
A. Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her;—she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday the seventh day, a change for which there is no Scriptural authority.
catholicvirginian.org/
Catholic Virginian Oct. 3, 1947, p. 9, art. “To Tell You the Truth.”
“For example, nowhere in the Bible do we find that Christ or the Apostles ordered that the Sabbath be changed from Saturday to Sunday. We have the commandment of God given to Moses to keep holy the Sabbath day, that is the 7th day of the week, Saturday. Today most Christians keep Sunday because it has been revealed to us by the [Roman Catholic] church outside the Bible.”

amazon.com/Things-Catholics-Are-Asked-About/dp/B002YUYVHC
Martin J. Scott, Things Catholics Are Asked About (1927), p. 136.
“Nowhere in the Bible is it stated that worship should be changed from Saturday to Sunday … Now the Church … instituted, by God’s authority, Sunday as the day of worship. This same Church, by the same divine authority, taught the doctrine of Purgatory long before the Bible was made. We have, therefore, the same authority for Purgatory as we have for Sunday.”

And now most likely I will be attacked for the post I made.

Luke.
 
And John doesn’t mention, once, anything at all about the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve, Moses, Noah…

According to your “nothing more, nothing less”…that means that we cannot proclaim this.

Do you see where your paradigm is leading you to, Lucky? :eek:
John lived in a time, a couple of years after the Ascension of Jesus. He could give us insight in the time he lived in. And the issues of the day.
 
One of the lastest books that was written is the Book of John & Revelation(not in the Vaticanus Manuscript). The Book of John being written ~85 - 105 ad.
John did not mention once to keep Sunday as the new Sabbath.

Around 200 ad the people wanted a day to remember the day of the Resurrection.
They start to celebrate it once a year.
At around 300 ad Jewish religion was banned and the Jews was prosecuted by the Roman Empire.
Lucky,

I haven’t been following this thread so I am a bit late. St Ignatius shows the practice of not following Saturday Sabbath was already in place by 110ad.

“If, therefore, those who were brought up in the ancient order of things have come to the possession of a new hope,** no longer observing the Sabbath, but living in the observance of the Lord’s Day,** on which also our life has sprung up again by Him and by His death–whom some deny, by which mystery we have obtained faith, and therefore endure, that we may be found the disciples of Jesus Christ, our only Master.” Ignatius, To the Magnesians, 9:1 (A.D. 110).

And St Ignatius was taught by St John the apostle. Here’s a non-Catholic source.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignatius_of_Antioch

I should also note that St John witnesses the heavenly liturgy taking place on Sunday in Revelation 1:10.

I’ll believe the Church, guided by the Holy Spirit in all Truth, the bible and St Ignatius writing in 110AD of a practice already in place and not Ellen White 1750+ years later.

You want to believe Ms White? :confused:

I hope she also doesn’t stop you from drinking a morning cup of coffee.

:coffeeread:
 
Lucky,

I haven’t been following this thread so I am a bit late. St Ignatius shows the practice of not following Saturday Sabbath was already in place by 110ad.

“If, therefore, those who were brought up in the ancient order of things have come to the possession of a new hope,** no longer observing the Sabbath, but living in the observance of the Lord’s Day,** on which also our life has sprung up again by Him and by His death–whom some deny, by which mystery we have obtained faith, and therefore endure, that we may be found the disciples of Jesus Christ, our only Master.” Ignatius, To the Magnesians, 9:1 (A.D. 110).

And St Ignatius was taught by St John the apostle. Here’s a non-Catholic source.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignatius_of_Antioch

I should also note that St John witnesses the heavenly liturgy taking place on Sunday in Revelation 1:10.

I’ll believe the Church, guided by the Holy Spirit in all Truth, the bible and St Ignatius writing in 110AD of a practice already in place and not Ellen White 1750+ years later.

You want to believe Ms White? :confused:

I hope she also doesn’t stop you from drinking a morning cup of coffee.

:coffeeread:
Hey

Who ever Ellen White is, she was following a baptist believe, and it is not needed to insult people in this forum.

The book Revelation is not in the Vaticanus Manuscript.

Luke
 
Hey

Who ever Ellen White is, she was following a baptist believe, and it is not needed to insult people in this forum.

The book Revelation is not in the Vaticanus Manuscript.

Luke
Big time dodge. Did you take lessons?

youtube.com/watch?v=JiZCjH6ePq0

St Ignatius shows in 110AD the Saturday Sabbath was not being kept,with Sunday as the new day of observance…100 years before your year 200 claim… And St Ignatius was taught by St. John. 👍
 
If you want to see dodging you can fight me in a boxing ring.
I’m in the ring. :slapfight:

You’ve done a lot of research,…Name a few of these groups Lucky.
There are groups of Christians that was not in the Roman Empire after 300 ad.
There are good records that they kept Sabbath until the 1800, 1900’s. More than 15 centuries.
 
Hey

Who ever Ellen White is, she was following a baptist believe, and it is not needed to insult people in this forum.

The book Revelation is not in the Vaticanus Manuscript.

Luke
Since this falls under my area of interest I will bite just this one.

Yes, the Codex Sinaiticus lacks Revelation, if it ever was there. (Someone inserted a later medieval copy though.) But the codex today also lacks 1-2 Timothy, Titus, and Philemon.

Vaticanus lacking Revelation is hardly proof of anything going by this logic, since three of the four great uncial manuscripts (of which Vaticanus is but one) - codices Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus and Ephraemi Rescriptus - do contain Revelation. Besides, these four - while important - are not our only witnesses to the text of the NT anyway.
 
Hi, Lucky,

Your refusal to document any of your statements is truly singular. Do you think others do not notice this refusal to respond to legitimate requests. Such refusals do nothing to ehnance your argument, and in fact, bring many other items into question. Is it that you want to present yourself this way?

It is truly amazing that you know so much about 7DA teachings but know so little about Ellen and her teaching. By the way, I guess I missed it - what insult are you talking about?

I understand that your statement about the Book of Revelation not being in the Codex Vaticanus is intended to be significant - but, I guess I missed that too! Please what is it you are saying about this? You may be interested in knowing that Revelations is not the only omission! Let me add on to what Patrick provided to you. Check this out:

**"Codex Vaticanus originally contained a virtually complete copy of the Septuagint (“LXX”), lacking only 1-4 Maccabees and the Prayer of Manasseh. The original 20 leaves containing Genesis 1:1–46:28a (31 leaves) and Psalm 105:27–137:6b have been lost and were replaced by pages transcribed by a later hand in the 15th century.[8] 2 Kings 2:5–7, 10-13 are also lost because of a tear to one of the pages.[9] The order of the Old Testament books in the Codex is as follows: Genesis to 2 Chronicles as normal; 1 Esdras; 2 Esdras (Ezra-Nehemiah); the Psalms; Proverbs; Ecclesiastes; Song of Songs; Job; Wisdom; Ecclesiasticus; Esther; Judith; Tobit; the minor prophets from Hosea to Malachi; Isaiah; Jeremiah; Baruch; Lamentations and the Epistle of Jeremiah; Ezekiel and Daniel. This order differs from that followed in Codex Alexandrinus.[10]

The extant New Testament of the Vaticanus contains the Gospels, Acts, the General Epistles, the Pauline Epistles, and the Epistle to the Hebrews (up to Hebrews 9:14, καθαριει); it is lacking 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, and Revelation. These missing leaves were supplemented by a 15th century minuscule hand (folios 760–768) and are catalogued separately as the minuscule Codex 1957.[3] Possibly some apocryphal books from the New Testament were included at the end (as in codices Sinaiticus and Alexandrinus),[3] as it is also possible that Revelation was not included.[11][12]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Vaticanus**

Where there are several links to the CV - I chose Wiki simply to show that obtaining a reference is not a demanding task. 😃 Here is a more scholarly link that may be helpful: newadvent.org/cathen/04086a.htm

I have no idea if you know this, but all of the Books of the New Teatament that were approved by the Catholic Church in about 400AD - are all in the abridged version of most Protestant Bibles (the abridgement took place with some of the Old Testament books). As Protestants are quick to say, “The Bible is the inerrant word of God” - and, Catholics do most certainly agree with that statement! 👍 Being ‘inerrant’ means that only the inspired Word of God is contained in the Bible - so a bogus book idoes not exist in the Bible! The Book of Relevation belongs in the Bible.

There is a certain amount effort we all need to put into posts - simply making unsubtantiated statements really does fall short of the mark. I’m confident you can do better - pleae, do not disappoint us.

God bless
Hey

Who ever Ellen White is, she was following a baptist believe, and it is not needed to insult people in this forum.

The book Revelation is not in the Vaticanus Manuscript.

Luke
 
I am not amused by your suggestion especially seeing as you claim that you know not what Ellen Gould-White believes and teaches.
I know the believes of the 7th Day Baptists.
Seventh Day Baptists trace the beginning of their movement to coalescing factors during the decade of the 1650s in England. These factors included the continuing Baptist movement in England, English language publications about the Sabbath in the early 1600s
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventh_Day_Baptists

Seventh-day Adventist Church
Origin May 21, 1863
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventh-day_Adventist_Church

Which is older?
 
Today, 5:26 am
Eric Hilbert Eric Hilbert is offline
Moderator

Join Date: September 30, 2009
Location: Non-Catholic Religions
Posts: 4,229
Religion: Catholic
Default You have received an infraction at Catholic Answers Forums
Dear Lucky_Catholic1,

You have received an infraction at Catholic Answers Forums.

Reason: Mod Activites Posting​

Mod Activites Posting​

This infraction is worth 5 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=10127840
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tqualey View Post
Hi, Lucky,

In no way do I want anyone to break any rules or get into any trouble based on a question I have asked. I certainly respect your response.

Ah, but you can tell me WHY you think you would be going off topic on the Sabbath thread question I asked? It honestly seemed like a logical challenge on why this particular OT command would be observed and similar OT commands not observed.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

God bless
I was penalized for mentioning baptism. you are out of context, you wanted to know about baptism, and now your saying it was about “Sabbath thread question I asked?”.
All the best,
Catholic Answers Forums
 
Today, 5:25 am
Eric Hilbert Eric Hilbert is offline
Moderator

Join Date: September 30, 2009
Location: Non-Catholic Religions
Posts: 4,229
Religion: Catholic
Default You have received an infraction at Catholic Answers Forums
Dear Lucky_Catholic1,

You have received an infraction at Catholic Answers Forums.

Reason: Mod Activites Posting​

Mod Activites Posting​

This infraction is worth 5 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=10116405
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tqualey View Post
but, Jewish washings and identification of clean and ‘unclean’ foods, circmucising males on the 8th day - and stoning those who do not honor God
Off-topic, I will be reported again for this if I respond.
All the best,
Catholic Answers Forums

Forum Rules and guidelines
 
Hey guys

Off-topic posting on other issues except Sabbath/Sunday caused Lucky to be banned.

Lucky’s original post:

“It is well to remind the Presbyterians, Baptists, Methodists, and all other Christians, that the Bible does not support them anywhere

in their observance of Sunday. Sunday is an institution of the Roman Catholic Church, and those who observe the day observe a

commandment of the Catholic Church.” Priest Brady, in an address, reported in the Elizabeth, NJ ‘News’ on March 18, 1903.
"Protestants … accept Sunday rather than Saturday as the day for public worship after the Catholic Church made the change… But the

Protestant mind does not seem to realize that … in observing Sunday, they are accepting the authority of the spokesman for the

Church, the pope." Our Sunday Visitor, February 5th, 1950.
Question: Why do we observe Sunday instead of Saturday?
Answer: We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic Church transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday.” -Rev.

Peter Geiermann C.SS.R., The Convert’s Catechism of Catholic Doctrine, p. 50
"Protestants … accept Sunday rather than Saturday as the day for public worship after the Catholic Church made the change… But the

Protestant mind does not seem to realize that … in observing Sunday, they are accepting the authority of the spokesman for the

Church, the pope." Our Sunday Visitor, February 5th, 1950.

The Catholic Church made the change, the Protestants which keeps Sunday, are keeping an institution of the Roman Catholic Church.

Agree Catholic Church made the change:
4 people agreed.

tqualey 1 time
“You have sent an excellent post!”

PRmerger 4 times
“Amen! And the Catholic Church did this based on Scripture and Tradition.”
“Amen!!”
“Lucky, no one is disputing that the Catholic Church changed the day of worship from Saturday to Sunday.That is a fact.”
“The Catholic Church changed the day of worship to the Lord’s Day, which is Sunday.”

Porknpie 2 times “St Ignatius 110 ad”, providing text outside the King James, which Protestants use.

Here are a lot of side issues going on here.

Take care.😉
 
Hey guys

Off-topic posting on other issues except Sabbath/Sunday caused Lucky to be banned.

Porknpie 2 times “St Ignatius 110 ad”, providing text outside the King James, which Protestants use.

Here are a lot of side issues going on here.

Take care.😉
How is St Ignatius a side issue to the belief in holding to the Saturday Sabbath? Lucky was not answering questions …dodging…but I would not speculate why Lucky was banned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top