M
Mike_Dye
Guest
Tatoos probably arn’t sinful…just way stupid 
actually at the resurrection of the dead on the Last Day, our bodies will be reunited with our souls in heaven, but as our bodies will be glorified and perfect at this time, I guess we will finally find out of tattoos and piercings will be allowed.I I honestly don’t think God minds, after all, our souls go to heaven, not our bodies.
Until then I say get ink if you want!actually at the resurrection of the dead on the Last Day, our bodies will be reunited with our souls in heaven, but as our bodies will be glorified and perfect at this time, I guess we will finally find out of tattoos and piercings will be allowed.
I doubt it says anything specific. There was a comedian on Comedy Central who was talking about tatoos – he was against getting a tatoo.What does the Church teach about tatoos?
not that I would ever get a tatto or piercing but in regards to that comment, so were Christmas trees and relics (medalions) at one point. As long as you are not worshipping the thing I don’t see how it would be a problem.I can’t bring to light the church’s standing, but I do know it says not too in the Bible. It talks about not getting peircings or inking the skin because it is a thing of pagans.
The verse you are quoting is LEV19:28…so my question is Why should we focus on one of these injunctions to the exclusion of the others?I can’t bring to light the church’s standing, but I do know it says not too in the Bible. It talks about not getting peircings or inking the skin because it is a thing of pagans.
Excuse me Brother,oh yeah. and somewhere in your posts i read that you say it is a sin to conciously inflict any pain to our bodies. I pose this question to you: Is it a sin for me to skateboard? I ask this because i do have full knowlege that i will hurt myself in this activity and have done so quite often over the years. Is that wrong for me to do?
To willfully inflict pain upon yourself in a manner in which is not directly glorifying Our Lord, or building up the Church, or building up your spiritual life. It would be considered self mutilation, and a grave disrespect the Temple of God. That is a sinful act.I absolutely refuse all safety equipment. Its cumbersome when moving that much. Is it a sin for me to skate without a helmet? I seriously doubt that it is. And any time that i go for a rail, even i would consider it a stupid risk. But a risk well worth taking if it goes as i intend it to. Is that a sin too?
So your telling me that skateboarding without a helmet is a sin? I must say that i do strongly disagree if that is what you were trying to say. I dont willingly inflict pain on myself, i dont plan on falling, it just happens. Like i said before, i intend for it to happen without injury. If you were a former skater than you know that no one ever learns new tricks first try, you always slam when you learn new tricks. So i intend for it to go without injury, but in reality i know that i will most likely get hurt…not for sure get hurt, but probably.To willfully inflict pain upon yourself in a manner in which is not directly glorifying Our Lord, or building up the Church, or building up your spiritual life. It would be considered self mutilation, and a grave disrespect the Temple of God. That is a sinful act.
In humility with all do respect to Mrs. Arnold, I believe she is very wrong and there some things to consider left out of her statement: The willful infliction of pain which is involved, the possible damage to your health, the misunderstanding of freedom, sinful elements involved in the fundamental reception of a tattoo, and greatest of all damaging the Temple of the Holy Spirit.LINK http://forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=39833&highlight=tattoo
QUESTION: Is getting a tattoo sinful?
*I have been considering getting a tattoo for about four years now. Excluding any inappropriate imagery or wording, would receiving the tattoo in general be considered a sinful act? *
REPLY:Michelle Arnold
Re: Is getting a tattoo sinful?
Other than a general injunction that there is an obligation to be mindful of bodily health and to avoid spending on luxuries money that one cannot afford, the Church does not take a position on body enhancements such as tattoos. So long as you take the proper precautions to safeguard your health and so long as the money it would cost is not needed for personal obligations, you are free to get a tattoo.
**1732 **As long as freedom has not bound itself definitively to its ultimate good which is God, there is the possibility of choosing between good and evil, and thus of growing in perfection or of failing and sinning. This freedom characterizes properly human acts. It is the basis of praise or blame, merit or reproach.
MercedesBents said:"the main reason why a person gets a tattoo is so that it can be seen, thereby fostering the sin of vanity
My my, we **are ** judgemental, aren’t we? I have a peace symbol where no one can see it.
I have one of an ancient Crucifix where noone can see it, which has the meaning “I believe in Jesus Christ, my Saviour, Son of God”! Really not much different to wearing a Crucifix around my neck!Originally Posted by Sean.McKenzie
Lets not kid ourselves, the main reason why a person gets a tattoo is so that it can be seen, thereby fostering the sin of vanity. Others will argue that there are secondary reasons also, such as; identification, or to remind themselves of a particular person or thing. We logically know this is unstable, because those ends can be achieved by many other means, and still more by natural means, i.e (memory). If you need to tattoo yourself to remember your own name, organization or a memory of another person or thing, then it seems that those things were not important enough to know by memory, in the first place.
MercedesBents said:"the main reason why a person gets a tattoo is so that it can be seen, thereby fostering the sin of vanity
My my, we **are **judgemental, aren’t we? I have a peace symbol where no one can see it.
Reason for this statement:With much repect and charity, it is still different, if it were indeed the same then why not just wear a crucifix? Wearing a crucifix around your neck is much less painfukl if at all, than cutting into the temple of Christ, wouldn’t you agree?
Is in reply to this statement:Originally Posted by Myangel
I have one of an ancient Crucifix where noone can see it, which has the meaning “I believe in Jesus Christ, my Saviour, Son of God”! Really not much different to wearing a Crucifix around my neck!
By your statement above, the wearing or tattoing of Jesus’ Crucifixion " can be achieved by many other means, and still more by natural means, i.e (memory)" All I did was change a few words in your statement from "Others will argue that there are secondary reasons also, such as; identification/CRUCIFIXION, or to remind themselves of a particular person/JESUS or thing"Originally Posted by Sean.McKenzie
Lets not kid ourselves, the main reason why a person gets a tattoo is so that it can be seen, thereby fostering the sin of vanity. Others will argue that there are secondary reasons also, such as; identification, or to remind themselves of a particular person or thing. We logically know this is unstable, because those ends can be achieved by many other means, and still more by natural means, i.e (memory). If you need to tattoo yourself to remember your own name, organization or a memory of another person or thing, then it seems that those things were not important enough to know by memory, in the first place.