What is the “source” of Christianity?
(Ten)thousands of (alleged) cases of sexual molestation of not only children by here in particular so-called Catholic priests are still (ten)thousands of (alleged) cases of sexual molestation by such regardless of how percentual it is.
I ain’t sayin’ it isn’t male-dominated (in a number of aspects). A thing I am saying though is that it isn’t happening just in these or those countries, and that demons care little to none about that they pretend to be.
Another thing is of course society/ies, culture/s, language/s at different places (and at different times in history), respectivly the context being wider than perceived ond presented - e.g. Surat Al-Baqarah 2:223
“Your wives are a place of sowing of seed for you, so come to your place of cultivation however you wish and put forth [righteousness] for yourselves. And fear Allah and know that you will meet Him. And give good tidings to the believers.”
quran.com/2/223
In particular e.g. sex-obsessed urbanish human supremacists who associate “field” as something dirty and savage probably see in the quoted ‘very bad’. Myself, I don’t exactly understand what “put forth righteousness for yourselves” means - being just? But I understand “seed” to not only be about biological seed (as in instructions on where a male’s seed is put) but also about emotional ond spiritual seed. “come to your place of cultivation however you wish” I understand as it being permissible for any husband to approach his wife from any side (such as entering a room she is in and also approaching her while her back, or also side, is turned to her husband - which if done in case of any other female may possibly be considered rude or perverted). I don’t speak Arabic, so how “accurate” the translation is and whether or not there is sexual implication of “however you wish and put forth” as about mutually agreed genital, oral and anal sex I don’t know, though it would seem weird in the context of “sowing of seed” regarding mouth and anus. Regarding this topic, e.g.:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral_sex_in_Islamic_law
Roughly I guess gentiles are to Judaism what are infidels to Islam what are pagans to Christianity what are capitalists to communism (and vice versa) what are religious to atheism etcetera, that is on a theoretical level. How particular views (e.g. perception of whatever as threat to entity) are expressed is a bit different topic, partially as in aforementioned hate crimes.
“The booty, the women slaves of Islam…the sultans’ concubines…this is Islam in practice.”
While I understand why (spoils of) war are wrong, I don’t think many understand why Christianity sees, in particular, spoils of war as wrong. In Islam in particular (high-way) robbery is illegal, and spoils of war were usual e.g. in the Roman Empire, I think.
“woman slaves of Islam” sounds as “priestesses”, but yeah, not only out-right slavery is wrong, but again, “slavery” can be a lot about definition thereof. Arguably e.g. in communist countries every one/worker was a slave to state or government, which arguably was better than being slave/serf to e.g. a feudalistic lord (which was so hereditarily), but arguably not really much different from being slave to oligarchy. As for woman slaves and Islam, I didn’t study the matter nor did I read Quran.
Which sultan? Concubinage is in practice in various forms by many in many places nowadays - in particular male paying e.g. rent, living costs, etc. for on her own living “lover/s”, which arguably is kind of better than her being shared (e.g. on the street) but arguably worse than living in one household. In particular regarding Saudi Arabia, maids in many households are not concubines.
Yes, ideally there should be no practice of concubinage, prostitution, sex-partying, etc., and many persons should be living more dignified lives than they do, though personally I am rather neutral about it if it regards consenting self-aware adults without adultery without clientelism etcetera.
Contraception is arguably better than abortion, though as you mentioned, the path e.g. to idolatry may be quick. Sexuality is part of human nature but it doesn’t define being human respectivly humanity.
Mind you, the person in the hospital may have been freaked out because he did read about so-called ‘superbugs’.
“Islam” is largely Quran. I am not saying that no whoever Muslim never ever mistreated a woman, but when your standpoint is that “Islam mistreats women” or “women are mistreated as instructed by Islam (that is the hardcore thereof)”, then you should have the decency to back such up (considering of course that verses taken out of context can misrepresent), respectivly to lay out particular issue/s - yes, you named e.g. that the practice of honour killings has no codified condemnation by Islam, and I argue/d that such is no condonation, or in example, if you see polygamy as “dishonouring” any such wife’s e.g. feminity ond dignity, then focus on such and express it.
As for ‘edits of the internet’, in itself trustworthiness depends on overall trust, but even when every information is proper without mispresentation, there is unfortunately room for manipulation as in hacking or photoshopped scanned pages/documents.
Anyhow, happy holidays!
) that follows the rule: “If you can complicate, never simplify !!!”.
