Satan has the whole world to use as a weapon against the Church.Brace yourselves, for the homosexualists will be outraged with this news and will try to convert us into homosexualists!
This whole “same-sex marriage” thing is another weapon used to bludgeon Christian in general and Catholics in particular.
The sad thing is, the mainstream media may ignore it since it does not go well with their narrative.The only people who will benefit from “Gay Marriage” are the divorce lawyers!
If you think you have seen a circus when two pop stars or Hollywood types get into a divorce scandal, wait until two homsexuals have it out in public! It will be XXXX rated to be sure.
I suppose if you keep making this same prediction nearly every time someone starts a thread on homosexuality eventually you’ll be right.Brace yourselves, for the homosexualists will be outraged with this news and will try to convert us into homosexualists!
This whole “same-sex marriage” thing is another weapon used to bludgeon Christians in general and Catholics in particular.
I think he is being rhetorical, since obviously the homosexualists are already trying to convert everyone else to their twisted point of view.I suppose if you keep making this same prediction nearly every time someone starts a thread on homosexuality eventually you’ll be right.
They either aren’t trying very hard or are failing miserably. In either case, the alarmist sentiment sometimes expressed in these parts seems sadly misplaced.I think he is being rhetorical, since obviously the homosexualists are already trying to convert everyone else to their twisted point of view.
C’mon. You are being kind of uncharitable to the homosexual community calling gay men “Queens”. Do you really need to use those kind of dirty tactics?The only people who will benefit from “Gay Marriage” are the divorce lawyers!
If you think you have seen a circus when two pop stars or Hollywood types get into a divorce scandal, wait until two Queens have it out in public! It will be XXXX rated to be sure.
This is an interesting question to me. I know gay people who call themselves “fg" and "quer.” (Many young women have recently embraced the term “sl*t” to describe themselves.)C’mon. You are being kind of uncharitable to the homosexual community calling gay men “Queens”. Do you really need to use those kind of dirty tactics?
That’s a good line but I think the point it makes is mistaken. First, few gay men will actually marry. Second, in the places where same-sex marriage has been legalized nationally (Spain, the Netherlands) have seen a decline in marriage rates. A declining marriage rate should make for fewer divorce cases.The only people who will benefit from “Gay Marriage” are the divorce lawyers!.
Interesting report, thanks for the link. I was surprised to learn that there is a higher incidence of homosexuality reported among non-white than among white respondents. Overall the percentage seems about right. It doesn’t seem right to me, however, that 3.4% of the population should be able to dictate their redefinition of marriage to the other 96.6%.They either aren’t trying very hard or are failing miserably. In either case, the alarmist sentiment sometimes expressed in these parts seems sadly misplaced.
Not all homosexuals are into “same-sex marriage” as the OP’s article says.Interesting report, thanks for the link. I was surprised to learn that there is a higher incidence of homosexuality reported among non-white than among white respondents. Overall the percentage seems about right. It doesn’t seem right to me, however, that 3.4% of the population should be able to dictate their redefinition of marriage to the other 96.6%.
So then less than 3.4% of the population has convinced a much higher percentage of heterosexuals that redefining marriage to suit less than 3.4% of the population is the right thing to do??? If that’s not manipulation, I don’t know what is.Not all homosexuals are into “same-sex marriage” as the OP’s article says.
There are also heterosexuals who support “same-sex marriage”, and they are not some minority position either. That is not in the OP’s article, but is based more from observations.
Do you know if polgamous marriage occured before mongamous marriage? If it did, that does not mean it was good for society and I do not think polgamous marriage has been homsexualWell, they are wrong about one thing marriage has not always been one man one woman. In many cultures over time it has been one man with multiple women and in very few cultures one woman and multiple men. Polygamy has been practiced in many cultures. I know that has little to do with the debate, but I thought I would point that out.
Decades of studies have found the benefits to society that marriage between 1 woman and 1 man brings. Polygamous marriage does not bring those benefitsIn cultures that permit men to take multiple wives, the intra-sexual competition that occurs causes greater levels of crime, violence, poverty and gender inequality than in societies that institutionalize and practice monogamous marriage
Some heterosexual parents, siblings, friends and relatives of LGBT people do not need to be manipulated into thinking that their son’s, daughter’s, friend’s, niece’s, nephew’s, or cousin’s relationship with a member of the same gender is worthy of the title of marriage. They do not have to be manipulated to see that marriage, as currently defined in many places, denies that person and his or her partner from a large number of legal benefits and protections and fails to recognize the dignity and value of that person’s relationship.So then less than 3.4% of the population has convinced a much higher percentage of heterosexuals that redefining marriage to suit less than 3.4% of the population is the right thing to do??? If that’s not manipulation, I don’t know what is.
Divorce cases, maybe. But, people will still move in together, one will spend too much, cheat or they’ll just get on each other’s nerves and need the courts to decide who gets what because neither can agree and are too angry to be rational.markeverett49;9919010]That’s a good line but I think the point it makes is mistaken. First, few gay men will actually marry. Second, in the places where same-sex marriage has been legalized nationally (Spain, the Netherlands) have seen a decline in marriage rates. A declining marriage rate should make for fewer divorce cases.