The #1 Bible Study Church = The Catholic Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter codebilly
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
lol, I hope so, since you guys seem to put yourselves as the true church, if you didn’t teahc more bible lessons then protestants, that’d be rather hilarious.
Howdy bareKnuckler!That would be funny indeed.At every mass there are a minimum of three scripture readings with a sermon following usually based upon same.That’s EACH AND EVERY MASS.Within three years the whole Bible is covered.Can ANY other faith body say the same?
 
The United States had 7,498 Catholic schools in 2006-07, including 6,288 elementary schools and 1,210 secondary schools. In total there were 2,320,651 students, including 1,682,412 students in the elementary/middle schools and 638,239 in high schools.

Every Catholic School teaches bible lessons for about 1 hour of class every single day to 2.3M students.

The Catholic Church therefore has taught more bible lessons (bible study) to children compared to any other Christian church, and for many many years.
You are wrong in two respects. Many, perhaps most Catholics schools accept non-Catholics to their schools as necessary to pay the bills. These children are not required to attend any religious education classes period. A friend of mine, a devout fundamentalist baptist sent her boys to one in Detroit, and she was very very clear that they receive no religious education, and the nuns there assured her that non-Catholics were not part of that class. So your numbers are perhaps way way off.
 
How active are your gay and lesbian “bishops” in your Church for Episcopalians?

Seems like all that time spent in Sunday School didn’t result in the lessons being learned.
A tiny little bit of exegetical work on the bible as regardly homosexuality might, just might convince you that perhaps you have come to the wrong conclusion. But I assume it won’t, because you must obey the church.
 
They are not pedophiles they are predatory homosexuals.I am SURE that there are NO predatory homosexual Anglican Priests.:rolleyes:
You have proof? Show it please. That’s a very very vicious and ugly claim to make. We have no scandal in our church along the lines of assaulting innocent children and then covering it up higher up the line. No doubt every church on earth has people in it not fit to be preaching. None have raised to the level of the priest scandal in the RCC however. And yet, how many are excommunicated for this?
 
Howdy bareKnuckler!That would be funny indeed.At every mass there are a minimum of three scripture readings with a sermon following usually based upon same.That’s EACH AND EVERY MASS.Within three years the whole Bible is covered.Can ANY other faith body say the same?
Yes, of course! ROFL
 
You have proof? Show it please. That’s a very very vicious and ugly claim to make. We have no scandal in our church along the lines of assaulting innocent children and then covering it up higher up the line. No doubt every church on earth has people in it not fit to be preaching. None have raised to the level of the priest scandal in the RCC however. And yet, how many are excommunicated for this?
Former priest to be placed on sex offenders register
Posted Mon Apr 7, 2008 6:16pm AEST

A former Tasmanian Anglican priest and convicted paedophile will be put on the sex offenders register for 8 years.

62-year-old Garth Stephen Hawkins will be listed on the register when he’s released from prison.

In 2003, Hawkins was sentenced to seven and half years in jail for abusing seven teenage boys in the 1970s and 1980s.

In 2004 he was sentenced to a further nine months prison for molesting another teenage boy in the 1980s.

Earlier this year police applied to the Magistrates Court to have the former priest placed on Tasmania’s sex offenders register.

Magistrate Glenn Hay ordered Hawkins to have a forensic mental health assessment before he made a decision.

This morning Mr Hay, granted the application.

There are many more available,if you’d like to see them.
 
You have proof? Show it please. That’s a very very vicious and ugly claim to make. We have no scandal in our church along the lines of assaulting innocent children and then covering it up higher up the line. No doubt every church on earth has people in it not fit to be preaching. None have raised to the level of the priest scandal in the RCC however. And yet, how many are excommunicated for this?
Please don’t strawman me.I said nothing at all about cover-ups for which certain Bishops in my Church most certainly are guilty.I was referring to predatory homosexual Anglican priests.
 
You have proof? Show it please. That’s a very very vicious and ugly claim to make. We have no scandal in our church along the lines of assaulting innocent children and then covering it up higher up the line. No doubt every church on earth has people in it not fit to be preaching. None have raised to the level of the priest scandal in the RCC however. And yet, how many are excommunicated for this?
Anglican Church to vote on priest sex offender laws
Posted Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:39pm AEST

Map: Brisbane 4000
The Anglican church in Brisbane is expected to vote today on major changes to the way it deals with clergy convicted of child sex abuse.

The Diocese of Brisbane is holding its annual Synnod this weekend and a vote is to be taken on amending church law on professional standards.

Archbishop Phillip Aspinall says currently in Queensland if a priest is convicted of child abuse there is a separate church process to decide if they should be expelled from the clergy.

He says the church will now vote on a motion to abolish that second process.

“If it is passed the effect will be that someone convicted of a child sexual offence could be automatically removed as a priest forever, without there needing to be any other formal process other than allowing the convicted person to put forward their case,” he said.

Obviously,for this Anglican body to take these measures there MUST be a problem within your communion.I applaud them by the way for their forthrightness.
 
You have proof? Show it please. That’s a very very vicious and ugly claim to make. We have no scandal in our church along the lines of assaulting innocent children and then covering it up higher up the line. No doubt every church on earth has people in it not fit to be preaching. None have raised to the level of the priest scandal in the RCC however. And yet, how many are excommunicated for this?
AnglicaPRIEST CHECKS
Clergy must have police clearance
By Joe Spagnolo and Gavin Simpson
THE Anglican Church is considering making police checks compulsory for all its WA priests.
Bunbury Bishop David McCall has told 30 priests from Mandurah to Albany that they must get police clearances to keep administering the faith.
He has also demanded that new priests to the region and Church members who deal with children also have such checks.
Bishop McCall said South-West priests supported the move because they recognised Australians had lost faith in church leaders because of sex crime involving children.
Existing priests elsewhere in WA do not have to have police checks but new clergy coming into the Perth diocese must have police clearance.

A spokesman for the Archbishop of Perth, Dr Peter Carnley, said yesterday the Church was actively considering making police checks compulsory for all Anglican priests.
But Dr Carnely said his preferred option was for an independent government-run system of screening cards to be introduced nationally.
They system would be based on the Queensland model under which anyone seeking to work with children anywhere must have a comprehensive criminal history check. This went beyond a standard police clearance.
In Queensland, the Commissioner for Children looks at criminal convictions and charges to determine whether a person is suitable for child-related employment. A successful applicant is given a plastic card
Read “Priest checks; Clergy must have police clearance,” The West Australian, Jun 27 02, page 1
Study more at multiline.com.au/~johnm/nonmarital.htm
similar to a bankcard which must be presented to a potential employer, such as a school, church or sporting organisation.
Dr Carnley said the national conference of Anglican bishops agreed in April to ask all State premiers to introduce the system and some had already responded.
If the national screening card system did not eventuate, the Church would have to think again about its options.
Bishop McCall said priests abusing young children had tarnished the reputations of the Anglican and Catholic churches. Parents did not feel as comfortable about letting their children come into contact with priests.
He said the Catholic and Anglican churches had lost credibility with the community because they had not been open about sex crimes involving priests.
The Church had been wrong to believe priests who were sex offenders would not reoffend because they had confessed their sins and said sorry.
“The Christian Church has traditionally said that if there was a case of child abuse and the person was sincerely repentant then they should be forgiven and given another chance,” he said.
"What was not understood was that people who have abused children will not stop despite having confessed and given all the assurances in the world that they will not reoffend.
“The sad reality is that a small percentage of priests who were child abusers were offending again and again.”
Alston, page 19

More?I think the last line is VERY telling.People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones,dear.
 
Former priest to be placed on sex offenders register
Posted Mon Apr 7, 2008 6:16pm AEST

A former Tasmanian Anglican priest and convicted paedophile will be put on the sex offenders register for 8 years.

62-year-old Garth Stephen Hawkins will be listed on the register when he’s released from prison.

In 2003, Hawkins was sentenced to seven and half years in jail for abusing seven teenage boys in the 1970s and 1980s.

In 2004 he was sentenced to a further nine months prison for molesting another teenage boy in the 1980s.

Earlier this year police applied to the Magistrates Court to have the former priest placed on Tasmania’s sex offenders register.

Magistrate Glenn Hay ordered Hawkins to have a forensic mental health assessment before he made a decision.

This morning Mr Hay, granted the application.

There are many more available,if you’d like to see them.
Your statement implied ALL were predatory homosexuals. Such inclusiveness is never accurate as you well know, and your example is not a predatory homosexual by your own admission. Thank your for your apology.
 
I have to go but I’d be delighted to continue this mannana:D
Yes it seems you take rather perverse delight in this rendition of examples that do not in any way prove your point, but prove the opposite. I suggest you cease such filth immediately.
 
Howdy bareKnuckler!That would be funny indeed.At every mass there are a minimum of three scripture readings with a sermon following usually based upon same.That’s EACH AND EVERY MASS.Within three years the whole Bible is covered.Can ANY other faith body say the same?
In the Methodist and Foursquare churches I’ve been mostly invovled in a Pastor would pick his scriptures to meet his topic. No I doubt in either denomination would the Sunday service cover the Bible in a year by design. However it is my understanding that the Calvary Chapel pastors do start at the Beginning and methodically work their way through to the Revelation.
 
Your statement implied ALL were predatory homosexuals. Such inclusiveness is never accurate as you well know, and your example is not a predatory homosexual by your own admission. Thank your for your apology.
I BEG your pardon lady-I did NO SUCH THING.You are bearing false witness against your neighbour-me!!!Don’t you DARE tell me what I was implying.I indicated that the Anglican Church has its fair share of predatory homosexual priests.And I proved it much to your chagrin.Would you like me to list dozens more examples?Apologise for being right?Give your head a shake…
 
Yes it seems you take rather perverse delight in this rendition of examples that do not in any way prove your point, but prove the opposite. I suggest you cease such filth immediately.
You are verging on character assassination.I know it’s rather unpleasant when it’s YOUR ox that’s being gored but you will never make your point by your outrageous ad hominum attacks.Pathetic.
 
You are verging on character assassination.I know it’s rather unpleasant when it’s YOUR ox that’s being gored but you will never make your point by your outrageous ad hominum attacks.Pathetic.
OKay, I get it now. This is one of those games wherein you say terrible things and then accuse the other person of doing it rather than yourself. Enough is enough. Consider our conversation at an end. I have cast no aspersions on you whatsover, just called you on your display.
 
Howdy bareKnuckler!That would be funny indeed.At every mass there are a minimum of three scripture readings with a sermon following usually based upon same.That’s EACH AND EVERY MASS.Within three years the whole Bible is covered.Can ANY other faith body say the same?
The church I used to go to did the same thing, except they weren’t catholic:shrug:
 
I do trust the Lord our God in every aspect of my life! He is always with me and you as well. Praise God!

God Bless!
It’s one thing to say you do, and another to do it. For instance… you have to listen to those Christ sent. These that Christ sent are now the Magisterium of the Catholic Church through apostolic succession. If you don’t believe that, then you don’t believe Christ in this matter. Can you bring yourself to trust Christ in this?
 
I asked how active your Catholic Adult Sunday/Bible School was. A simple question.

FYI-- This might be something that you are interested in getting started in your Catholic Church. Many Catholics are very interested in joining a Bible Study.
greatadventureonline.com/page.asp?ContentID=2

God Bless!
Yes, I understood what you asked. Please understand what I wrote. Here is an easier translation. What good is a Bible study if the interpretations are not guaranteed to be error free? The correct teaching is only available in the Catholic Church. All others teach falsely to some degree or another. So, you want quantity over quality? So, therefore, you ask the wrong question.

I do Bible Study, with the teachings of the Church. That’s the only way we know what God really teaches, whether via written or oral Tradition. By going to mass on Sunday, we have two Bible readings, a Psalm, and Gospel reading. Then, we have a homily ostensibly from one following correct Catholic teaching. Then we have valid and licit Sacrament of the most Holy Communion. Even if one does not do Bible study, one has the Catholic Church which does not teach falsely. What good is it to memorize Scriptures when one has false understanding of what they mean? Ideally, we have knowledge of Scriptures and knowing without error what they mean… come to the Catholic Church for this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top