W
water
Guest
They omit the entire NT - That is their problem as they believe Jesus is just another man.Probably because they believed it to be of MAN also.
They omit the entire NT - That is their problem as they believe Jesus is just another man.Probably because they believed it to be of MAN also.
Unfortunately, history doesn’t back your view…unless, of course, by “Jewish Bible,” you mean the Septuagint. It infact was established before the current canon of the Jews. The NT quotes from the OT come from the Septuagint 80% of the time.Paul said the “oracles of God” were committed unto them. It means our Old Testament is the same as their Jewish Bible.
Rom 3:1
What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit [is there] of circumcision?
Rom 3:2
Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.
Those books are often use for reference in the 2/3 of the NT has reference pointing out to the Septuagint or the Deutorocanonical.Probably because they believed it to be of MAN also.
I don’t have to look at history books written by MAN. I just have to look at the Jewish Bible to see the Old Testament which excludes the Apocrypha.Unfortunately, history doesn’t back your view…unless, of course, by “Jewish Bible,” you mean the Septuagint. It infact was established before the current canon of the Jews.
how come you have no problem reading Protestant’s version which is twisted by a single man - Luther?I don’t have to look at history books written by MAN. I just have to look at the Jewish Bible to see the Old Testament which excludes the Apocrypha.
That’s just your religion talking.how come you have no problem reading Protestant’s version which is twisted by a single man - Luther?![]()
The Council of Jamnia was held in 90 A.D made a final canon of Scripture for the Jews. Around this time, the Jewish Priesthood ended, and the only left were the rabbi. They declare that only Hebrew written text are to be used in their worship. These Jews also deny Jesus is God.I don’t have to look at history books written by MAN. I just have to look at the Jewish Bible to see the Old Testament which excludes the Apocrypha.
So are you saying that it was the Christian Jews that set the Old Testament canon?I trust Paul’s teaching. He was also a Jew. He was also a Jew that persecuted the church. He was the same Jew that Jesus spoke to. The same Jew that is the Apostle to the gentiles.
How do you explain the word “only” to faith?That’s just your religion talking.
I believe what Paul said to Christian believers regarding the Oracles of God. The Jews missed the Messiah but that doesn’t mean they missed the Oracles.Those books are often use for reference in the 2/3 of the NT has reference pointing out to the Septuagint or the Deutorocanonical.
It is not of men. Those books are inspired word of God.
Here are scriptural verses that cite those 7 OT text.
Matt. 2:16 - Herod’s decree of slaying innocent children was prophesied in Wis. 11:7 - slaying the holy innocents.
Matt. 6:19-20 - Jesus’ statement about laying up for yourselves treasure in heaven follows Sirach 29:11 - lay up your treasure.
Matt… 7:12 - Jesus’ golden rule “do unto others” is the converse of Tobit 4:15 - what you hate, do not do to others.
Matt. 7:16,20 - Jesus’ statement “you will know them by their fruits” follows Sirach 27:6 - the fruit discloses the cultivation.
Matt. 9:36 - the people were “like sheep without a shepherd” is same as Judith 11:19 - sheep without a shepherd.
Matt. 11:25 - Jesus’ description “Lord of heaven and earth” is the same as Tobit 7:18 - Lord of heaven and earth.
Matt. 12:42 - Jesus refers to the wisdom of Solomon which was recorded and made part of the deuterocanonical books.
Matt. 16:18 - Jesus’ reference to the “power of death” and “gates of Hades” references Wisdom 16:13.
Matt. 22:25; Mark 12:20; Luke 20:29 - Gospel writers refer to the canonicity of Tobit 3:8 and 7:11 regarding the seven brothers.
Matt. 24:15 - the “desolating sacrilege” Jesus refers to is also taken from 1 Macc. 1:54 and 2 Macc. 8:17.
Matt. 24:16 - let those “flee to the mountains” is taken from 1 Macc. 2:28.
Matt. 27:43 - if He is God’s Son, let God deliver him from His adversaries follows Wisdom 2:18.
Mark 4:5,16-17 - Jesus’ description of seeds falling on rocky ground and having no root follows Sirach 40:15.
Mark 9:48 - description of hell where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched references Judith 16:17.
Luke 1:42 - Elizabeth’s declaration of Mary’s blessedness above all women follows Uzziah’s declaration in Judith 13:18.
Luke 1:52 - Mary’s magnificat addressing the mighty falling from their thrones and replaced by lowly follows Sirach 10:14.
Luke 2:29 - Simeon’s declaration that he is ready to die after seeing the Child Jesus follows Tobit 11:9.
Luke 13:29 - the Lord’s description of men coming from east and west to rejoice in God follows Baruch 4:37.
Luke 21:24 - Jesus’ usage of “fall by the edge of the sword” follows Sirach 28:18.
Luke 24:4 and Acts 1:10 - Luke’s description of the two men in dazzling apparel reminds us of 2 Macc. 3:26.
John 1:3 - all things were made through Him, the Word, follows Wisdom 9:1.
John 3:13 - who has ascended into heaven but He who descended from heaven references Baruch 3:29.
Where do you see “only” in this verse?How do you explain the word “only” to faith?
I believe the Jews at the time of Christ, as well as those outside of Palestine know the Septuagint. These books were written in 6 to 1 B.C.I believe what Paul said to Christian believers regarding the Oracles of God. The Jews missed the Messiah but that doesn’t mean they missed the Oracles.
Your piety is to be honoured, but the fact is that the Septuagint is infact Jewish. The current canon that you use is not nearly as old. In fact, no Christian used it until the 1800’s. The Jews formulated that canon around 100 A.D. These are the same Jews who remember the false stories of Jesus’ body being taken by his disciples. Do you really trust this canon.I don’t have to look at history books written by MAN. I just have to look at the Jewish Bible to see the Old Testament which excludes the Apocrypha.
Rom 3:1I believe the Jews at the time of Christ, as well as those outside of Palestine know the Septuagint. These books were written in 6 to 1 B.C.
The Jews rejected the Jesus as their Messiah, and paid for it in 70 A.D when the Romans sack Jerusalem and destroy the Temple.
Oracle of God? God has no Oracles, he has prophets…apostles, teachers,
False. The Word of God isn’t called the Word of God for nothing. Man may have moved the pen but that’s as far as it goes.Your piety is to be honoured, but the fact is that the Septuagint is infact Jewish. The current canon that you use is not nearly as old. In fact, no Christian used it until the 1800’s. The Jews formulated that canon around 100 A.D. These are the same Jews who remember the false stories of Jesus’ body being taken by his disciples. Do you really trust this canon.
BTW: All the books are written by MAN. So, if you don’t believe in accepting the work of men, you’ll have to reject ALL Scripture…
Prayers and petitions,
Alexius![]()
You are truly misinform and truly Anti-Catholic in your belief.Rom 3:1
What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit [is there] of circumcision?
Rom 3:2
Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.
This will be just another one of the those verses that you’ll have to ignore to accomodate your apocrypha.
There’s that pesky term again…God uses men!False. The Word of God isn’t called the Word of God for nothing. Man may have moved the pen but that’s as far as it goes.