The anti-Christ

  • Thread starter Thread starter HailHolyQueen90
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Inego_de_Loyola said:
Why not discuss this on another forum and just link to it from here? that way no forum rules are violated, we save the mods one heck of a headache, and we get this conversation moving again.
Click to expand...
Can I just post the link to my web site?
 
Inego_de_Loyola said:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=301286

This George and John Mark nonsense seem to be what he’s referring to.
Click to expand...
Son of a gun, it is already done! Imagine that! My very first post! I had completely forgotten about that!

Thanks, Ignatio! May God Bless you richly, may He forgive you for having called His Two Witnesses, “nonsense.” I know you did it from ignorance and not malice.

No more vague allusions from me. I didn’t realize that I already posted this, and was not banned. I am not here to debate this, which is not up for debate. As George says, “take it or leave it.”
 
cjmclark said:
1.) I haven’t been posting here longer than you. You have 6 more posts than I, and apparently have been a member here for 8 more years than I have.

2.) I don’t need to know. As I think I’ve made pretty clear, I hold with the Church’s assertion that only God the Father knows the appointed hour. That’s good enough for me as far as eschatological business goes, especially since many of our brothers and sisters around the world have already been living in a state of suffering for such a long period of time. I’m not a fan of the popular notion that the End Times begin when those of us in the western world start to suffer.

3.) My assertion of “special knowledge” is based on your assuredness that the Antichrist’s identity is apparently evident when the Church has not seen fit to declare it so. It is my hope that were such evil to come upon us, the Church would be the first to warn us.

4.) My wife and I both pray the Rosary, but thank you for your concern.
Click to expand...
All that you have said is good, and thank you for saying it.

Antichrist’s reign is over! You will witness it from the opposite end, in retrospect, as Recent History. The Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary has already begun. Antichrist is already in Hell.
 
kubark said:
This thread is about the antichrist . . .
Click to expand...
Respectfully, kubark, you have may have some understanding, but you are basing much of what you say on speculation. God fulfills His Holy Scripture, His way.

The name of the AntiChrist is John Bascivicius. He is a Franciscan priest in Saint Anthony’s monastery in Kennebunkport, Maine.

Benedict XVI is what we may refer to as the “Black Pope.” He is the puppet of the AntiChrist. That is the fulfillment of prophecy, with or without LaSalette.

Benedict XVI has fallen into material heresy. He said it’s O.K. for a male prostitute to use condoms to prevent the spread of AIDS, which is one of the Plagues.

Pope John Paul II will soon be raised from the dead. He is God’s Beloved Pope. His Apostolate in the Chair of Peter has not yet finished.

Benedict XVI has worshiped the Idol of Intellectualism and has worshiped his own intellect in the process.

When Benedict XVI was Cardinal Ratzinger, the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, he had one task, and one task only to carry out: to bring George and John Mark to the Pope, and ask him, “Holy Father, please take a look.” He refused to do so. That was his whole reason for existing. He could have accepted God’s graces, instead he rejected them, and you see what has happened. George waited for twenty-five years in heroic obedience to Pope John Paul II. Those of us who know George know who he is. He is the Little Child who will lead us.

If Judas Iscariot had accepted God’s graces, he would right now be a canonized Saint just like the other Apostles. If Benedict XVI had accepted God’s graces, he would have simply asked his boss, God’s Beloved Pope, to make his decision of discernment in the Holy Spirit regarding George and John Mark. But since he didn’t, God is no longer waiting for His priesthood and hierarchy to act. He is bypassing the corrupt priesthood and hierarchy, and issuing discernment of George and John Mark Himself, in Love. He is God, after all, and He can do anything at all.

Looking back at this thread,

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=301286

I can see that everything is already done.

God is God, folks. He does whatever He chooses to do, His way. No one is His counselor. He does not need your permission to do what He wills to do, and He is not asking you. He is simply offering you your conversion from your sins. The categories of sin are pride, anger, lust, greed, gluttony, envy, and sloth. He is not allowing Himself to be offended by the sins of His human creatures any longer. Everything I have said is within, not outside of, Catholic Doctrine.

Here is the link to my web site:

georgeandjohnmark.info

or

josephfg.tripod.com

Here is the link to the particular document regarding all I have said about Benedict XVI:

josephfg.tripod.com/catholicism/archbishopsambi.html

Likewise, in the above letter, is what I have said about God now bypassing His hierarchy and issuing discernment of George and John Mark, himself.

If I am now banned from this forum, so be it. Nothing depends on this forum anyway. I’d rather stay, but that is up to the mods I guess.

But now you know.
 
A final note: despite the fact that Benedict XVI will never issue discernment of George and John Mark, he is still the Pope, and you should still ask him. One of the things George used to say again and again and again was, “ask the Pope!” I myself wrote a letter of obedience to Pope John Paul II, asking him, “Holy Father, who are George and John Mark?” I wrote a second letter to Benedict XVI after Pope John Paul II died.

You should, too. It is an act of obedience to God’s Church. God knows everything, including what is in the depth of your heart, and every one of your actions. You will not lose your reward if you simply ask the Pope for discernment.

And, Peace!
 
In reference to the OP’s original question:

Two recommends, *Wrath of God: The Days of the Antichrist * by Livio Fanzaga (published by Roman Catholic Books), and *Lord of the World *, a fictional novel by Fr. Robert Hugh Benson.
Also, a Catholic look at popular versions of the Rapture by end-timers such as Hal Lindsay, Jack VanImpe, LaHaye/Jenkins etc., Will Catholics Be Left Behind? by Carl E. Olsen.
 
“…the anti-Christ is from Kennebunkport?..”

The anti-Christ looks a lot like the Secretary of Health and Human Services!
 
jonbhorton said:
Given the female nature, I’d go with whore of Babylon. 😃
Click to expand...
Apparently I missed the fun,
Have you seen a recent picture of Hillary Clinton? One commentator asked if she is actively auditioning to be the next Bond villian.
😃
 
“Have you seen a recent picture of Hillary Clinton?”

Descended from the Slapaho Tribe? :eek:
 
The_Scott said:
And there’s no official Church document on the antichrist. There would be sermons and opinions by theologians, but in the end they are just that - opinions.
Click to expand...
This is patently false. The Scriptures are Church documents in the truest and highest sense and they speak of the Antichrist.

The Church Fathers offer the substance of most traditional beliefs about the Antichrist.

Note that we say Antichrist in reference to “that man” who is “the son of perdition” but that does not mean there are not scores of antichrists. Anyone who (i) denies or (ii) dissolves Christ is an antichrist. They in some way prefigure the Antichrist.

Denial is not simply a formal denouncing of Christ in word but in deed also. A man can claim to believe in Christ but if he effectively denies Him in practice, and especially if he conjoins such practice on others, he is an antichrist. Likewise for dissolving Christ. A man can blaspheme and say that Christ is only or purely God. Because he has excluded the fact that Christ is also a Man, he has effectively dissolved Christ. The more obvious example would be for someone to blaspheme and say that Christ was only a Man. By excluding and denying the fact that He was also truly God, he dissolves Christ. The final example would be dissolution of Christ by making Him common in the pantheistic sense, e.g., equating everything or anyone with Christ indiscriminately. This is effectively what the Protestants began to do when they blurred the necessary distinction between Christ’s Real Presense and His Mystical Presense in the Church, e.g., thus reducing (dissolving) the former (Real Presence in the Eucharist) to be something somewhat equivalent to the latter (Mystical Presense in the Church). An extreme example would be identifying indiscriminately all of humanity or creation as or with Christ, effectively elevating mankind to being sacred but at the same time, since it is impossible to realize, reducing both Christ, the sense of the sacred and humanity to a base commonality.
 
Luvtosew said:
Ha Ha, but given the arrogance of some males, I think its a male.😉
Click to expand...
Most women with short hair in high government positions are inherently male in their character and demeanor. In many ways, this is a direct result of the sort of system in which the Anti-Christ could prevail- confused.

If you notice, many of the high-ranking males in government act very feminine in certain aspects.

The Baphomet image is dual-sex. The confusion of roles is but one block to check in destroying a society.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top