I don’t mean to start an East v. West debate, but the West did not retain as much Judaic tradition as the East (I mean like the Orient, not the Greeks) simply because of geographic proximity. So, for instance, in the Middle East the synagogue model was repurposed (evident in things like the bema and the sanctuary veil) whereas in the West the basilica model was adapted. Likewise, there’s a much greater propensity to offering incense in the East (such as the hoosoyo in the West Syriac Churches, which is a rite centered around the offering of incense). Our offices are similarly structured to the Jewish offices, and the chant is much more similar since some of the melodies are literally just adaptations (like the melody Qom Fawlos). Our readings are supposed to normatively be like the Jewish readings (i.e. a reading from Law and then Prophets), with of course the typological reflection of that in the New Covenant (Epistle + Gospel).
That being said, it seems any Apostolic Church should have a great deal of Christianization of Jewish tradition. I just don’t understand the certain amount of romanticization that I see given to the Jewish faith, especially since modern Judaism is vastly different from the pre-Post-Temple Era Judaism of Christ. Edit: What I mean to say about the romanticization remark is that even if the Syriac Churches have retained more Jewish rituals and liturgical architecture, that doesn’t necessarily ensure a qualitative “betterness” that some people might be inclined to give it based on just that.