S
spencelo
Guest
There’s nothing “dishonest” with first asserting a conclusion and then attempting to demonstrate it via dialogue. I believe you understand that your dishonesty charge, which is quite serious – hence why I felt necessary to reply – is itself dishonest and wrong. The way I was raised, it’s plainly unethical to fling charges of “dishonesty” casually or cavalierly, and I would not do so without very strong evidence. Perhaps you were taught differently, in which case I’m saddened.If this were the case then you would have presented a logical set of statements that ends with this conclusion. The more that you argue this point the more you seem to be trying to justify yourself, the more credibility you loose.
I thought that you for real at first and had good intentions despite your intensity, I am sorry that I was wrong.