The Art of Killing--for Kids

  • Thread starter Thread starter spencelo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
cbc.ca/natureofthings/episode/smarty-plants-uncovering-the-secret-world-of-plant-behaviour.html

This is a world where plants talk, forage, wage war and protect their kin; a world where plants behave a lot like us.

Stay in denial all you want but your plant eating is harming an entire primitive world. Just because they don’t reason with us doesn’t mean they don’t have feelings.
Plants exhibit interesting behavior, which is all the link amounts to. There is no suggestion that plants possess any sort of mental state, feelings, desires, etc–not suggestion that plants can suffer. You are grasping for any twig, however brittle, to avoid having to accept very uncomfortable conclusions.
 
Plants exhibit interesting behavior, which is all the link amounts to. There is no suggestion that plants possess any sort of mental state, feelings, desires, etc–not suggestion that plants can suffer. You are grasping for any twig, however brittle, to avoid having to accept very uncomfortable conclusions.
There are many other studies that have shown that plants communicate with one another and exhibit fear.

You can be in denial all you want but one day you’re going to have to face the uncomfortable truth that you too are heeding the call of nature and eating creatures that are less developed then you are. 🤷
 
I’m not sure what you’re asking. I believe it’s wrong to kill animals for food, even if they’ve been well-treated and happy.
You are an extremist who is attempting to force your beliefs on others.

Why should we be forced to live according to your morality? 🤷
 
There are many other studies that have shown that plants communicate with one another and exhibit fear.
It’s easy to assert that there are “many studies” showing that plants can suffer. Where are they?

As for being in denial, how do you answer the argument against “happy meat” I give here? animalblawg.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/whats-wrong-with-happy-meat/ Tell me that your animals “don’t suffer” doesn’t cut it because my argument takes that into account.
 
It’s easy to assert that there are “many studies” showing that plants can suffer. Where are they?

As for being in denial, how do you answer the argument against “happy meat” I give here? animalblawg.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/whats-wrong-with-happy-meat/ Tell me that your animals “don’t suffer” doesn’t cut it because my argument takes that into account.
How many links do we have to swap. You dismiss mine. I dismiss yours.

I am not convinced by your argument. If you want more studies go some pages back. I don’t feel like digging them up again. They’re there. You can post your happy meat article all you want. I do not find it convincing. At all.

Don’t you have any others? I’m getting bored of being redirected to the same one over and over and over and over and over and over and over 🤷

PS: All this to say I reject your morality and substitute my own.

When the Catholic Church says that eating meat is immoral I will stop eating meat. Until then I will raise happy animals and kill them as humanely as possible and then enjoy their juicy, juicy meat. 🙂 I will also murder plants, an unsophisticated form of life that has been shown to communicate and exhibit feelings. At least I’m honest about it. You’re just in denial.
 
You are an extremist who is attempting to force your beliefs on others.

Why should we be forced to live according to your morality? 🤷
I’m not “forcing” anything on anybody – but rather putting forth my views, which you are apparently more than willing to read and engage. As for my views, I’m simply appealing to moral principles and premises that you already accept: the difficult part is getting you to realize that they commit you to my conclusions.
 
How many links do we have to swap. You dismiss mine. I dismiss yours.

I am not convinced by your argument. If you want more studies go some pages back. I don’t feel like digging them up again. They’re there. You can post your happy meat article all you want. I do not find it convincing. At all.

Don’t you have any others? I’m getting bored of being redirected to the same one over and over and over and over and over and over and over 🤷
I only saw that one study, and as I explained, it doesn’t even purport to claim that plants can suffer. Let me ask: do YOU believe that plants can suffer? Yes or no? If not, then I think bringing up “studies” allegedly purporting to show the sentience of plants is a bit disingenuous.
 
If they weren’t raised for food they would never have been born.
Right, and they shouldn’t be if we’re going breed them into existence only to be killed for food.

Consider: suppose we can breed a group of humans to be eventually killed (at a healthy age) for organ extraction. Would it be right to do so? Of course not, and it’s no defense to say “but they wouldn’t have been born if there was no breeding program.”
 
I only saw that one study, and as I explained, it doesn’t even purport to claim that plants can suffer. Let me ask: do YOU believe that plants can suffer? Yes or no? If not, then I think bringing up “studies” allegedly purporting to show the sentience of plants is a bit disingenuous.
sigh Fine.

Here you go. Since you’re so determined you must have studies.

viewzone.com/plants.html

collegian.psu.edu/archive/2008/12/09/recent_studies_have_proven_pla.aspx

nytimes.com/2011/03/15/science/15food.html?pagewanted=2
 
I’ll take a look at those articles seriously, but I’d like an answer to my question: do YOU believe that plants can suffer? Yes or no?
I thought I made that clear? Yes. I do. I believe they are an unsophisticated life form but I don’t feel that means they do not have some form of feeling. Perhaps it doesn’t involve brains and sophisticated functions but that doesn’t mean they aren’t living creatures that feel in some way or another. They react in a manner that seems to exhibit fear. They function in such a way that it seems as if they attempt to protect those of their ‘specie’, if you will. They are very fascinating.

However, just because I have great respect for them doesn’t mean I hesitate to raise them for the purpose of food. I’m consistent you know?

Animals and plants are below me in the food chain. I will eat them without hesitation.

Human beings are beside me. They are my species and I would never eat them (even if it was proven that they’re tasty). Why? Because that would make me less then human. 🤷
 
I thought I made that clear? Yes. I do. I believe they are an unsophisticated life form but I don’t feel that means they do not have some form of feeling. Perhaps it doesn’t involve brains and sophisticated functions but that doesn’t mean they aren’t living creatures that feel in some way or another. They react in a manner that seems to exhibit fear. They function in such a way that it seems as if they attempt to protect those of their ‘specie’, if you will. They are very fascinating.

However, just because I have great respect for them doesn’t mean I hesitate to raise them for the purpose of food. I’m consistent you know?

Animals and plants are below me in the food chain. I will eat them without hesitation.

Human beings are beside me. They are my species and I would never eat them (even if it was proven that they’re tasty). Why? Because that would make me less then human. 🤷
First, the claim that plants “suffer” is hard to make sense of because they lack nervous system, a necessary physiological requirement to feel pain. Do plants feel “pain?” No studies I’ve seen support this claim.

Second, I don’t believe you are consistent because you arbitrarily draw the line at “human.” Some groups arbitrarily draw the line at “male,” “black,” “gay,” etc. Why is the “human” line rationally defensible but not the lines drawn along race and gender?
 
First, the claim that plants “suffer” is hard to make sense of because they lack nervous system, a necessary physiological requirement to feel pain. Do plants feel “pain?” No studies I’ve seen support this claim.

Second, I don’t believe you are consistent because you arbitrarily draw the line at “human.” Some groups arbitrarily draw the line at “male,” “black,” “gay,” etc. Why is the “human” line rationally defensible but not the lines drawn along race and gender?
I draw the line at human because all humans share the same species as me. A human being is a human being regardless of cognitive ability, race, or gender. So yes I am consistent. I don’t eat those who share my position on the food chain.

So suffering MUST be connected to the nervous system? Don’t humans suffer without physical pain? So why couldn’t plants experience some form of suffering? Who are we to say they don’t experience suffering in a way we cannot and do not? How do we know they aren’t far more sophisticated then our science currently reveals. Science does not know all… yet.

And what will you do, hypothetically, if one day it is proven that plants DO suffer in some way or another when we rip them from the ground?
 
What the cheetah does is bad but not immoral – cheetah simply doesn’t know any better, and he needs to do it to survive. If I had things my way, I would drive predators to extinction if there would be less suffering in the world.
Oh the irony…not to mention the hypocrisy! Does driving predators to extinction not entail their suffering? Please enlighten us on the humane way to make a species extinct.

FWIW, my husband and I don’t hunt animals. We’d rather hunt for our golf balls on (or more likely, OFF) the course. But we have several relatives who do. Deer sausage is a yummy treat in the fall. 😃
 
I draw the line at human because all humans share the same species as me.A human being is a human being regardless of cognitive ability, race, or gender. So yes I am consistent.
The racist is consistent as well: “I draw the line at white because all whites share the same color as me. A white human is a white human regardless of cognitive ability, gender, nationality, religion, etc.”
So suffering MUST be connected to the nervous system? Don’t humans suffer without physical pain?
Mental suffering still requires a nervous system.
And what will you do, hypothetically, if one day it is proven that plants DO suffer in some way or another when we rip them from the ground?
Then I would have to evaluate my actions accordingly.
 
Oh the irony…not to mention the hypocrisy! Does driving predators to extinction not entail their suffering? Please enlighten us on the humane way to make a species extinct.
I’m not suggesting what to do in terms of specifics. As an abstract matter, the extinction of predators could be a good thing because the world would have less amounts of suffering in it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top