N
NewsTheMan
Guest
I have not heard much about this faith within the Church.
Without being too blunt: why are they a false religion?
Without being too blunt: why are they a false religion?
They teach the world’s major religions, like Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, etc, are all progressive revelations of God. They teach that their religion is the latest revelation.If I remember correctly - I was doing some reading about the Baha’i because I knew someone in that faith and was curious - don’t they also pitch a form of syncretism, wanting to make kind of a one-size-fits-all religion?
They do not believe Bahaullah is a prophet. They believe that he is a correct interpreter of the prophets.They believe that God sent a messenger to each age of civilization and that this man, whose name is Bahaullah (Ba-how-a-la) is the most recent prophet.
If you have nothing “on topic” topic say, then I am not sure why you posted. I did not bring it up three times; I brought it up twice. In light of the fact that I have several grievances with the apologists, I was being extremely tactful in my post. I have emailed the forum countess times regarding answers given by Michelle Arnold, which seem misleading. I never receive replies. Last summer, a thread was started on a Facebook discussion forum about how Ms. Arnold claimed that contraception IS acceptable in certain circumstances. Several of us from the Facebook discussion group sent emails to Catholic Answers. NONE of us received a response. One person from the Facebook group indicated that he had problems with her in the past. I could go on and on with countless examples about lack of professionalism. You don’t know me, so don’t give me this baloney about my “unresolved feelings.”Not for nothing but I believe we caught the drift the first time you mentioned Catholic Answers apologists not reply Izze25. The second and third mention is relating then to your own unresolved feelings?
God Bless, Gary
It’s because Bahais do recognise the primacy of Peter in church life, and therefore the papacy as such, that Abdu’l-Baha and Bahais are critical of many of the Popes: the things they have done were not only private sins, they fell short of the exceptional standards that must be upheld by such an exceptional office.I found this article on what appears to be an official Baha’i website: reference.bahai.org/en/t/ab/SAQ/saq-34.html
They don’t appear to be terribly fond of the papacy.
andJudas Iscariot was the greatest of the disciples, and he summoned the people to Christ. Then it seemed to him that Jesus was showing increasing regard to the Apostle Peter, and when Jesus said, ‘Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church,’ these words addressed to Peter, and this singling out of Peter for special honour, had a marked effect on the Apostle, and kindled envy within the heart of Judas.
(Abdu’l-Baha, Selections from the Writings of Abdu’l-Baha, p. 163)
Consider the first century of the time of Christ-glory be unto Him! – and the beginning of His Cause. In that time no one but a certain few persons believed in Him; and the great one among them was Peter the disciple…
Baha’u’llah and Abdu’l-Baha were also critical of the Islamic and Jewish religious leaderships, not because religious learning and leadership is a bad thing, but because it requires the highest standards: those who meet these standards, they rightly praise, while the religious leaders who fall short are condemned, for they keep not only themselves but also others from realising the truths of religion; they are condemned most especially where they provoke religious fanaticism or seize temporal power. In the section you have linked to, Abdu’l-Baha says:(Abdu’l-Baha, Tablets of Abdu’l-Baha v3, p. 528)
Bear in mind that these words were spoken about 1905: I would like to think that Abdu’l-Baha would have approved of some of the more recent PopesAmong the Popes there are also some blessed souls who followed in the footsteps of Christ, particularly in the first centuries of the Christian era when temporal things were lacking and the tests of God were severe. But when they came into possession of governmental power, and worldly honor and prosperity were gained, the Papal government entirely forgot Christ and was occupied with temporal power, grandeur, comfort and luxuries.
Syncretism.why are they a false religion?
of course not, they are not within the church so why should you hear about them? did you do a search to find out their history (brief) and beliefs?I have not heard much about this faith within the Church.
Without being too blunt: why are they a false religion?
Baha’is elect Local, National Spiritual Assemblies annually and every five years the Universal House of Justice which is on Mount Carmel in Haifa, Israel… There are no priests or Mullahs in the Baha’i Faith. There’s no formal connection of Baha’is with the Unitarian- Universalist Association. Only Abdul-Baha and Shoghi Effendi were the recognized Interpreters of the Baha’i Writings… Believers are free to offer their own opinions but someone who claims authority for themselves and seeks a following could be designated as a Covenant Breaker…I was under the impression that there is a hierarchy, of sorts. There are local and national assemblies as well as an international House of Justice that governs the Baha’i Faith. I was also under the impression you could get yourself “shunned.” I’ve read about liberal Baha’i complaints about the religion being too conservative and too doctrinal. A group of them formed a Baha’i group within the Unitarian Universalist Association, if I am not mistaken. It sounds to me like there is a definite limit to what they would consider a reasonable interpretation of their religion.
What we Baha’is say is that there is only one religion of God and that all the major religions have a common Divine Source. The Baha’i Writings are regarded as revealed by the Bab (1844- 1850) the Predecessor of Baha’u’llah ; Baha’u’llah (1853 - 1892) and Abdul-Baha (1892-1921) His eldest Son the Interpreter of the Writings in that order.If I remember correctly - I was doing some reading about the Baha’i because I knew someone in that faith and was curious - don’t they also pitch a form of syncretism, wanting to make kind of a one-size-fits-all religion?
The Bab and Baha’u’llah are accepted by us as Universal Prophets …They do not believe Bahaullah is a prophet. They believe that he is a correct interpreter of the prophets.
For them Mohamed is the last prophet.
Well, without being too blunt, I have never heard the Vatican ever refer to the Baha’i Faith or indeed any other faith for that matter as a “false religion”I have not heard much about this faith within the Church.
Without being too blunt: why are they a false religion?