The blessed Virgin and Traditionalism generally-speaking

  • Thread starter Thread starter GloriousOrder
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course no properly informed Catholic will consider Mary on the level of a goddess, but I have met many people including priests who have crossed that line. They claim they don’t worship Mary but in practice actually do. After all the church has a name for this - Mariolotry. At the wonderful second Vatican Council, there was a push to have a seperate document on Mary but the Council Father wisely decided to incorporate its statement on Mary in the document on the Church, thus signaling that the church’s teachings on Mary needed to be put in its most appropriate context. By the way, I encourage everyone to read the incredible documents of the second Vatican Council. From discussions I have had with many people, few have actually read them, especially people who vilify the Council. Please read the documents. Clearly the Holy Spirit was speaking to the Council Fathers and the entire Church.
 
Actually, people who claim to be “traditionalists” are actually “innovationalists.” They wish to bring back innovations, such as mass only in latin and Mary worship (mariolatry) which were discarded by the church in the reforms of the wonderful Second Vatican Council. I grew up in a home were everything was about Mary but Jesus was never mentioned. So I am bit sensitive to this. We need to be real traditionalists and go back to the teachings and practices of the apostles and the early church fathers. Clearly Mary was highly honored but not worshiped. She was not an alternate Great Mother Goddess as some Catholic make her out to be, in spite of consistent church teachings. Mary is one of us who God chose to be the “God Bearer” and to be assumed into heaven and indeed Queen of Heaven, but always one of us. These are great teachings, in fact some like the Incarnation are at the core of Christianity. But many other teachings about Mary are not at the core of Christianity, especially the numerous private revelations. Many of which are doubtful. I am now concerned that there is a real push among even some bishops to define infallibly that Mary is the Co-Redeemer of mankind. Now this touches our core beliefs. This is heresy. I know Pope John Paul set up a commission to look at this and they declined it. But heresy always will arise again. Hopefully the Pope will define that Jesus is the sole Redeemer of humanity. I often pray to Mary but I feel I do it in a way that follows the real traditions of the Church. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit always come first. If you don’t pray to Mary that is your choice and it will be acceptable to our God and will actually be consistent with the very first traditions of the church.
Also why would you have a problem with Her being call the Co-redeemer? She suffered more than any other human but Christ and She willingly gave up Her most precious son for us. As far as I’m concerned She will always be the Co-redemtrix.
 
I wonder if I’d go to Hell for never once praying to the blessed Virgin from now on? :eek: The claims get “curiouser and curiouser”, so I don’t wonder that it might lead up to such a saying!
Disregarding the awesome power Our Lady’s intercession in all honesty could land a soul in hell. One Hail Mary can be the difference between the Beatific Vision and fire and brimstone. Just remember Alphonsus, King of Leon and Galicia, who’s simple wearing of the rosary obtained Our Lady’s favour and saved him from hell-fire.
 
I think for many people, the Blessed Virgin isn’t an extra step, she is a crucial step which helps them to be closer to Christ. However, if you feel your relationship with God seems complete without the frequent Marian devotions, I can’t find any fault with that. As you say, Jesus is the Way Himself so those devotions, while potentialy very helpful, are not obligatory. If you’re concerned about whether or not you can call yourself a “true traditionalist”, I have to wonder why it even matters. I don’t think it will matter to God at all if you were a traditionalist or not.
 
Actually, people who claim to be “traditionalists” are actually “innovationalists.”
I think I’ll go with the only pope to be canonized in the last 500 years or so

“Indeed, the true friends of the people are neither revolutionaries, nor innovators: they are traditionalists.”
Pope St. Pius X
 
I think for many people, the Blessed Virgin isn’t an extra step, she is a crucial step which helps them to be closer to Christ. However, if you feel your relationship with God seems complete without the frequent Marian devotions, I can’t find any fault with that. As you say, Jesus is the Way Himself so those devotions, while potentialy very helpful, are not obligatory. If you’re concerned about whether or not you can call yourself a “true traditionalist”, I have to wonder why it even matters. I don’t think it will matter to God at all if you were a traditionalist or not.
Some people believe that the only way to be truly Catholic is, indeed, to be a traditionalist. This is evinced by the quote from Pope St. Pius X. It is true that all holiness in human history comes through tradition. Every ancient culture recognised this, before the advent of written tradition. We absolutely need tradition in order to be authentically guided by God, who works in the mysterious rungs of history more than in the pages of dusty old books: for the book of the Bible is nothing in of itself, only a collection of the writings of the Church, but still of great importance to us.
Disregarding the awesome power Our Lady’s intercession in all honesty could land a soul in hell. One Hail Mary can be the difference between the Beatific Vision and fire and brimstone. Just remember Alphonsus, King of Leon and Galicia, who’s simple wearing of the rosary obtained Our Lady’s favour and saved him from hell-fire.
I’d ask you to quote something in the Scriptures which leads you to this conclusion, but I suppose it’s a moot question at this point. 😦 You’ll come up with some reference from a saint or pope and trump my entire objection in three seconds. Of course, our Lord never explicitly or implicitly said anything in His Holy Gospel that even comes close to this. All He ever talks about is the individual man justified by God, faith, inner moral reformation, righteousness, justice, and, above all else, humility.

I hate to sound at all cheeky, but this is totally serious: have you actually read the Gospels recently? The stuff you’re saying contradicts the words from Christ.
 
I’d ask you to quote something in the Scriptures which leads you to this conclusion, but I suppose it’s a moot question at this point. 😦 You’ll come up with some reference from a saint or pope and trump my entire objection in three seconds. Of course, our Lord never explicitly or implicitly said anything in His Holy Gospel that even comes close to this. All He ever talks about is the individual man justified by God, faith, inner moral reformation, righteousness, justice, and, above all else, humility.

I hate to sound at all cheeky, but this is totally serious: have you actually read the Gospels recently? The stuff you’re saying contradicts the words from Christ.
It most certainly does not! Are you saying prayers do nothing? That’s hardly the message of the New Testament. Te Deum is saying that prayer can mean the difference between being saved and not being saved
James 5:15-16
And the prayer of faith shall save the sick man: and the Lord shall raise him up: and if he be in sins, they shall be forgiven him. Confess therefore your sins one to another: and pray one for another, that you may be saved. For the continual prayer of a just man availeth much.
If our prayers have the power (not of themselves, but if and because it pleases God to so use them) to save, to bring a sinner to contrition and repentance, do the Blessed Virgin’s prayers somehow not have this power?
 
This was pretty much summed up by Pope Benedict XVI within a month of His election to the Papacy. And He is regarded as a theologian whom is Christ centered. 🤷

One month after His election in St. Peters square he called upon the faithful gathered their, thus the world to entrust themselves to Our Lady of Fatima. :eek:

Peace, Gary
 
It most certainly does not! Are you saying prayers do nothing? That’s hardly the message of the New Testament. Te Deum is saying that prayer can mean the difference between being saved and not being saved.
This thread is not about prayers generally, but prayers addressed specifically to the blessed Virgin. Where do you get the notion that I believe prayer does nothing? Te Deum is (or seems to be) saying that we will go to Hell without a devotion to the Mother of God. No one disputes that one must pray in order to be saved. The matter in dispute is whether one can have no devotion to the blessed Virgin - other than asking her to pray for him on a daily basis with all the other saints - and be saved. His answer was negative, apparently.
If our prayers have the power (not of themselves, but if and because it pleases God to so use them) to save, to bring a sinner to contrition and repentance, do the Blessed Virgin’s prayers somehow not have this power?
The contention is that the message of God, in history, is precisely: you become just, you become righteous, you have faith, and that you improve to become like unto God. There’s a big difference between having faith in God, and depreciating your faith so much that you feel unworthy to address God proximately, and must do so via the blessed Virgin.

I find God to be very consistent through history. He was the principle of prayer in the Old Covenant, and continues to be in the New. The ancients, our fathers and patriarchs, knew to pray to God first, refusing to address even the angels with the same syntax as that with which they addressed God. Can you find me any instance in the entire Scriptures where any being but God is asked for mercy? The blessed Virgin certainly isn’t asked: “Lady, have mercy on me, for my son is ill”. Only those who believed Jesus to be God said such a thing, and only to Jesus.

Do the Acts show any honest seekers asking the Apostles for mercy? It just doesn’t come up; yet, we have Marian prayers which beg the Virgin for “thy mercy”, and to send “thy graces”. Seriously, what is that supposed to mean? This is divine terminology. We are our own primary intercessors for mercy, praying through Christ and in the Holy Ghost. Perhaps if the “Hail, Mary” started with the Jesus Prayer said by the individual, it’d be less egregious to me? 😉
One month after His election in St. Peters square he called upon the faithful gathered their, thus the world to entrust themselves to Our Lady of Fatima.
Indeed! 😦 I am conflicted about such sayings. On the one hand, none are trustworthy but God; on the other, we are talking about the humblest of saints and greatest of noble ladies.

Dear me… with Catholicism being entirely rooted in Mariology (so much so that losing the daily rosary makes families lose the faith, apparently), Anglicanism having invalid Orders, Orthodoxy being insufferably stuffy and stubborn… I have no where to go, no peace of heart. Thank God we at least have the Sacred Heart and many other Christ-centered devotions!
 
This thread is not about prayers generally, but prayers addressed specifically to the blessed Virgin. Where do you get the notion that I believe prayer does nothing? Te Deum is (or seems to be) saying that we will go to Hell without a devotion to the Mother of God. No one disputes that one must pray in order to be saved. The matter in dispute is whether one can have no devotion to the blessed Virgin - other than asking her to pray for him on a daily basis with all the other saints - and be saved. His answer was negative, apparently.

The contention is that the message of God, in history, is precisely: you become just, you become righteous, you have faith, and that you improve to become like unto God. There’s a big difference between having faith in God, and depreciating your faith so much that you feel unworthy to address God proximately, and must do so via the blessed Virgin.

I find God to be very consistent through history. He was the principle of prayer in the Old Covenant, and continues to be in the New. The ancients, our fathers and patriarchs, knew to pray to God first, refusing to address even the angels with the same syntax as that with which they addressed God. Can you find me any instance in the entire Scriptures where any being but God is asked for mercy? The blessed Virgin certainly isn’t asked: “Lady, have mercy on me, for my son us ill”. Only those who believed Jesus to be God said such a thing, and only to Jesus.

Do the Acts show any honest seekers asking the Apostles for mercy? It just doesn’t come up; yet, we have Marian prayers which beg the Virgin for “thy mercy”, and to send “thy graces”. Seriously, what is that supposed to mean? This is divine terminology.
Go and read some decent Marian Literature and then come back and start another thread
 
Do you have any suggestions?
The Secret of the Rosary by St Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort
True Devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary by St Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort
The Glories of Mary by St Alphonsus Ligouri
Devotion to the Sacred Heart by Fr Croiset (an essential read to see how devotion to mary engenders devotion to her son Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ)
Divine Mercy in My soul (again to see how devotion to Mary engenders devotion to her son Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ)
The life of St Dominic by Augusta T Drane
The writings of St Thomas Aquinas on Our Lady

And of course the relevant papal encyclicals

That should keep you busy for some time 😛
 
This thread is not about prayers generally, but prayers addressed specifically to the blessed Virgin. Where do you get the notion that I believe prayer does nothing? Te Deum is (or seems to be) saying that we will go to Hell without a devotion to the Mother of God.
The point I was making was actually about Our Lady’s prayers. What is true of prayer in general is true of her prayers too, since they are prayers. And they are what we are asking for in the Hail Mary. If, as we read in Scripture, “the continual prayer of a just man availeth much”, then the prayers of the saints and Our Lady do even more. To be clear: the only ‘power’ Mary has is the ability to pray to God.

The quote you objected to said that Our Lady’s intercession can mean the difference between heaven and hell. And I agree, it can: her prayers, being extremely powerful, can obtain for us great graces. Also, adoring the Immaculate Conception for her sinlessness, leads us to repent for our sins, and desire to be fully dedicated followers of Christ.

Those graces, of course, take the form of repentance for sins, and faith in Jesus Christ. Or to use your phrase “the individual man justified by God, faith, inner moral reformation, righteousness, justice, and, above all else, humility.”

My point was just that, we can pray for a sinner to receive these graces, and sometimes our prayers for someone’s conversion are answered. Therefore it should come as no surprise that Mary’s prayers do too. And, since Mary is the Christian whose will is most fully attuned to God’s, her prayers are in fact quite powerful. Therefore, asking her for her prayers is one of the most natural things a Christian can do.
 
I’d ask you to quote something in the Scriptures which leads you to this conclusion, but I suppose it’s a moot question at this point. 😦 You’ll come up with some reference from a saint or pope and trump my entire objection in three seconds. Of course, our Lord never explicitly or implicitly said anything in His Holy Gospel that even comes close to this. All He ever talks about is the individual man justified by God, faith, inner moral reformation, righteousness, justice, and, above all else, humility.

I hate to sound at all cheeky, but this is totally serious: have you actually read the Gospels recently? The stuff you’re saying contradicts the words from Christ.
TuAutem has done a very good job in answering for me, which I appreciate (we Marians need to stick together! Fist-bump!)

First, I am disturbed by your dismissive attitude regarding the Tradition of the Church embodied by the saints and popes. We’re not Protestants. Scripture is not our only authority. In fact the Church is our authority. Scripture is what the Church says it is. So you should not have to have everything laid out for you in the Scriptures. It’s a dogma binding on all Catholics to believe in the Immaculate Conception but the Immaculate Conception isn’t detailed in Scripture is it?

But Mary’s role in our salvation is. It’s most evident in the Incarnation. God became Man and he made the Blessed Virgin a partaker in his glories goal of redemption of humanity. Jesus Christ came to us from the womb of the Blessed Virgin. Jesus Christ revealed Himself by the prayer of the Blessed Virgin. Jesus Christ has worked and continues to work His greatest miracles through the Blessed Virgin, Mother of the Son, Daughter of the Father and Spouse of the Holy Ghost.

God does not change, He has already ordained to come to us from the Blessed Virgin’s hands once in the Incarnation, he equally desires to come to us from the Blessed Virgin’s hands even now.

You people, you speak going “going to Christ directly” and avoiding the “stepping-stone of Mary”. How can you not see? The direct path to Jesus Christ is Our Blessed Mother Mary! The path you have taken is winding and full of brambles because you have refused the patronage of a Mother whom Christ Himself delivered to you. How can you offer so much disrespect towards Our Queen? To speak of her in such terms as to tear from her bosom the Blessed Child Jesus?

I’ll end with this. I strongly recommend Saint Alphonsus’s Glories of Mary (before de Montfort’s True Devotion). It says it all better than I can.
Te Deum is (or seems to be) saying that we will go to Hell without a devotion to the Mother of God.
Simply because every other devotion is weak and pale in comparison. Our Lady is the chosen path of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. This is evident in Scripture from the very moment the Angel honoured her and proposed the Incarnation and she said “behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it done unto me according to thy word”.

Without Our Lady’s intercession, I really do not have very much hope for those who turn away from her.
 
TuAutem, your post blends nicely into Te Deum’s post, so…
TuAutem has done a very good job in answering for me, which I appreciate (we Marians need to stick together! Fist-bump!)
😛 Lovely factionalism!
First, I am disturbed by your dismissive attitude regarding the Tradition of the Church embodied by the saints and popes. We’re not Protestants. Scripture is not our only authority. In fact the Church is our authority. Scripture is what the Church says it is. So you should not have to have everything laid out for you in the Scriptures. It’s a dogma binding on all Catholics to believe in the Immaculate Conception but the Immaculate Conception isn’t detailed in Scripture is it?
Indeed; you’d think that if God deigned to add Elijah’s assumption into Heaven via chariot, He might have had the Assumption, too. Either these lapses show that the events in the Virgin’s life before, between, and after the Nativity, Presentation, Finding in the Temple, Crucifixion, and Ascension are not as important as we think, or there is more to belief than just what’s in Scripture. Having reluctantly entered into Catholicism (because it seemed “more true” than other faiths), I am at a crossroads with this entire thread and your posts. Thank you for at least clarifying the issue!
God does not change, He has already ordained to come to us from the Blessed Virgin’s hands once in the Incarnation, he equally desires to come to us from the Blessed Virgin’s hands even now.
Says who? Simple question, but meant with total seriousness. Exactly which Popes, ‘traditions’, and declarations say that without a devotion to Mary, we’re hell-bound and cast aside? If it’s so crucial, why does our Lord not tell us, in Matthew 25, that we who did not “come to Me through My Mother” are going to Hell? We are to feed the hungry, give drink to the sick, take in strangers, clothe the naked, visit the imprisoned, have faith in God, be baptised, and attend to the holy Sacrifice of the Eucharist. All these things are one in the same, revolving in a great circle of eternal righteousness.

The fact is that everything the Church says is an interpretation of, or based on, or justified by a quote from the Holy Scriptures. As much as you’d like to say the Bible is just one writing of the Church, the Church itself bases every last little thing it says on those Books. Scriptures are not to be dismissed; though they are not to be crowned as the height of everything, they are rather high up there.
You people, you speak going “going to Christ directly” and avoiding the “stepping-stone of Mary”. How can you not see? The direct path to Jesus Christ is Our Blessed Mother Mary! The path you have taken is winding and full of brambles because you have refused the patronage of a Mother whom Christ Himself delivered to you. How can you offer so much disrespect towards Our Queen? To speak of her in such terms as to tear from her bosom the Blessed Child Jesus?
“We people” are Catholics, and proud to be in the Church that has the only true priesthood, Sacrifice, sacraments, divine justice, prophecy, sainthood, and guiding light of Christ our Lord. We are not split apart from you, as ones from Apollo, Cephas, Paul, or Christ. 🙂

The only path our Lord describes as “full of brambles” is the path of Mark 4:18-19, in which those seeds who hear the Word and yet give in to the deceits, riches, and temptations of the world. The Word is Christ, not Mary; we come to Christ THROUGH CHRIST, who leads us to the Father. Where did this notion come from that we must go to Mary first in order to get to Christ, in order to get to the Father? He said that He is with us 'till the end of the Age, and always there when two or more of us gather. He’s RIGHT HERE, on C.A.F., as we pray for and with one another. It is right and just to honour Mary, but to say that we don’t get to Christ perfectly without her is… well, I’ll just be plain: blasphemous!

I say one Hail Mary every day, and sing one in Chant with the Franciscans every Sunday. This is enough for me, and I respect her immensely. I don’t need to call her the one and only gate to Christ, nor be filled with thoughts that total consecration to her is somehow required for salvation. You may not say it, but how can I interpret your posts any differently? Your dedication to her is fanatical and out of proportion, I think… that, or my devotion is radically lame, and just as out of proportion! :confused:
Without Our Lady’s intercession, I really do not have very much hope for those who turn away from her.
Lack hope, then; meanwhile, in Christ we all have Faith, Hope, and Charity. By Baptism, they are infused, and by Confession they are restored once lost. We are to “confess our sins to one another”, so I do use the Confiteor proudly, because Mary deserves to hear my sins as much as any other saint, so she may pray for me. It’s not as minimalist as you think, this mindset! 😃
 
Read this. It’s Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman regarding Our Lady and her office. It’s shorter than the other works I have provided and relies heavily on the Early Fathers etc. Hopefully it will help.

christendom-awake.org/pages/marian/newman1.html

However I will not rely solely on that. You’re going in my rosary intentions today young lady (I think :p?)! See how long you can last then :D!
 
Read this. It’s Blessed John Henry Cardinal Newman regarding Our Lady and her office. It’s shorter than the other works I have provided and relies heavily on the Early Fathers etc. Hopefully it will help.

christendom-awake.org/pages/marian/newman1.html

However I will not rely solely on that. You’re going in my rosary intentions today young lady (I think :p?)! See how long you can last then :D!
Believe me, if I were a woman I’d be much more inured to the idea of Marian devotion. I assume it’s easier for a female to relate to her than to Christ. That’s “excusable” from my point of view, but I think the fact that I’m a male leads me to be more heroically-inspired by Jesus. 😃

I respect Newman… let’s see!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top