The book of Revelation: the four horsemen

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ron_Conte
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The first was like a lion, but with eagle’s wings. While I watched, the wings were plucked; it was raised from the ground to stand on two feet like a man, and given a human mind. (Dan 7:4)

Another kingdom shall take your place, inferior to yours, then a third kingdom, of bronze, which shall rule over the whole earth. (Dan 2:39)


Doesn’t the scenario call for Iran to conquer Iraq first?

How does our current occupation of Iraq factor in?
No, I don’t think that Iran conquers Iraq. The two horns of the ram in Daniel 8:3 are the two leaders, one of Iran and the other of Iraq. One horn is higher than the other, symbolizing that one leader has more power, but both rule at the same time, over the same group of nations (the ram).

I don’t think the current U.S. presence in Iraq is much of a factor. Iraq will be taken over by extremists, as will the other nations of that region (but not Israel).
 
No, I don’t think that Iran conquers Iraq. The two horns of the ram in Daniel 8:3 are the two leaders, one of Iran and the other of Iraq. One horn is higher than the other, symbolizing that one leader has more power, but both rule at the same time, over the same group of nations (the ram).

I don’t think the current U.S. presence in Iraq is much of a factor. Iraq will be taken over by extremists, as will the other nations of that region (but not Israel).
Do you think NATO would sit on around doing nothing while Europe is being invaded, the whole purpose of NATO was to defend Europe, besides why would Islam attack Europe? they would lose, and they hate Israel more than Europe anyway.

Perhaps china invades Siberia for resources, but otherwise nobody, not even Russia is capable(at this time) of taking down NATO. Even if NATO falls apart the European Union would rally and defeat the intruders. Besides, Islam hasn’t been united in around 1600 years, it would take a lot for them to put down there differences and fight together.

Also, why wouldn’t Islam attack Christians in Africa? America would never be willing to go into Africa and there wouldn’t be to much resistance compared with Europe. Every genocide in Africa has been either ignored or dubbed something like"situation" because if America calls anything a genocide they are required to help, and they wont do that in Africa.
 
No they would not strong enough or even capable of invading Europe. They would all be bombed out of existence by Nato (including US) before any of them could set foot on European soil. It would also be highly likely that Russia would side with Nato.
Iran will never be allowed to complete a nuclear weapons program as they will be attacked by Israel and likely backed by the US.
Your scenario (even though speculative) is a non-starter.
Your position is reasonable.

But politics, war, and the various influences on politics and war are complex. Before WW2, Germany was in the midst of a severe depression, and appeared to be unable to conquer Europe. Yet they quickly became able to go to war. This scenario cannot be entirely ruled out.
 
Which war? WWIII? Will the entire world be engaged? I am trying to understand what point you are making, because we are currently engaged in a world with several fronts that doesn’t look like it is going to end any time soon.
No, I’m not saying that Europe will be conquered in 2010, but only that the war begins in 2010 and continues throughout the 2010s.

Yes, this is speculative eschatology.
 
No, I don’t think that Iran conquers Iraq. The two horns of the ram in Daniel 8:3 are the two leaders, one of Iran and the other of Iraq. One horn is higher than the other, symbolizing that one leader has more power, but both rule at the same time, over the same group of nations (the ram).

I don’t think the current U.S. presence in Iraq is much of a factor. Iraq will be taken over by extremists, as will the other nations of that region (but not Israel).
Who do you think will be the one to take over Israel (Dan 9:26-27; 11:30-31; 12:11)?

During their respective times, Daniel predicted Antiochus and Jesus predicted the Romans.
 
No, I don’t think that Iran conquers Iraq. The two horns of the ram in Daniel 8:3 are the two leaders, one of Iran and the other of Iraq. One horn is higher than the other, symbolizing that one leader has more power, but both rule at the same time, over the same group of nations (the ram).

I don’t think the current U.S. presence in Iraq is much of a factor. Iraq will be taken over by extremists, as will the other nations of that region (but not Israel).
You can read just about anything you want into books like Daniel and Revelation. It’s pure speculation and personal opinion to definitively associate anything in those books with Iran and Iraq in our times.
 
Which war? WWIII? Will the entire world be engaged? I am trying to understand what point you are making, because we are currently engaged in a world with several fronts that doesn’t look like it is going to end any time soon.
Yes, I interpret the first seal (first horseman) to be World War 3. However, the whole world won’t be involved in the war; it is not a truly global war. Neither are all the superpowers involved in the war (U.S. Russia China).
 
Who do you think will be the one to take over Israel (Dan 9:26-27; 11:30-31; 12:11)?

During their respective times, Daniel predicted Antiochus and Jesus predicted the Romans.
No, I don’t think that Israel will be conquered during the war.
 
Ron you said…“No, I don’t think the invasion begins this year. The war begins this year, but not the actual invasion.” My question is how do you have a war without an invasion?
Or does it start by missle attacks or by some other alternative way?
 
No, I don’t think that Israel will be conquered during the war.
That is the difficult part of trying to apply prophecy that has already been fulfilled into the future. Jesus applied some of Daniel’s verses to a different set of circumstances during the first century. But in both cases Israel was conquered AFTER the wars/signs leading up to the desolation.
 
Ron you said…“No, I don’t think the invasion begins this year. The war begins this year, but not the actual invasion.” My question is how do you have a war without an invasion?
Or does it start by missle attacks or by some other alternative way?
If I am correct the first event is a series of insurrections, coups, and small battles/wars in and among the Arab/Muslim nations of the Middle East and northern Africa which results in extremists taking power in all those nations, united as one group of nations, under the leadership of Iran and Iraq (Persia and Media). Then they begin to threaten the West.

[Daniel]
{8:3} And I lifted up my eyes and saw, and behold, a single ram stood before the marsh, having two high horns, and one was higher than the other and growing higher still.
{8:4} After this, I saw the ram brandishing his horns against the West…
 
If I am correct the first event is a series of insurrections, coups, and small battles/wars in and among the Arab/Muslim nations of the Middle East and northern Africa which results in extremists taking power in all those nations, united as one group of nations, under the leadership of Iran and Iraq (Persia and Media). Then they begin to threaten the West.

[Daniel]
{8:3} And I lifted up my eyes and saw, and behold, a single ram stood before the marsh, having two high horns, and one was higher than the other and growing higher still.
{8:4} After this, I saw the ram brandishing his horns against the West…
Key word: “If”
 
I have to be a party pooper here. Revelation is a vision of heaven. The battle is eternal but fulfilled on earth at the dawn of the Church age. It plays out eternally in heaven but on earth it’s influence after it’s earthly fulfillment is a progressive reversal of good and evil. The invisible battle is a sublime deception that convinces people that what is good is evil. Jesus said if you hear of wars and rumours of wars the time is not yet. Not even a rumour of war . He goes on to describe the time of His return as one of self sufficiency and consequently faithlessness. Man will have made his heaven on earth having successfully conquered the consequences that accompanied sin down the ages. Jesus describes the time as like the time of Noah before the flood. People marrying and asking where is this coming? Just as they said to Noah, where is this flood? It’s not a time of escalating war and violence but of an increasing self sufficiency. The Peace the world has to offer. Thisw is evil’s victory. The paroousia is a war between truth and deception and deception will have come to a head with a world having accepted it’s most sublime expression. That’s why Jesus asks When the Son of Man returns will He find any faith on earth?
I don’t see prophecy looking forward to increasing war and violence on earth . The spirit of prophecy is unveiling the hidden past as the end nears. It indicates through the sayings of Jesus, an increasing peace that comes from evil being called good as man evercomes the consequences of sin. When the diciples are silenced the very stones will cry out.:twocents:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top