But how much of that is due to their unique place as Religious? I’m thinking anruari’s post is more to do with those in a secular state.
Yes of course it is due to the fact that they were allowed to continue their traditions. Many don’t know though that the original Benedictine breviary has been adapted to the post-Vatican II era; those adaptations include:
-Using the same OT canticle at Lauds as the 4-week LOTH
-The permission to abolish Prime and distribute its psalms either through Vigils (putting Vigils on a 2-week cycle) or through the Minor Hours;
-The option to place the hymn as for the current LOTH (before the psalmody for Lauds and Vespers), with the option to continue placing the hymn after the responsory for Lauds and Vespers;
-The same liturgical year reforms as for the Roman Rite (Advent, Christmastide, OT, Lent, Eastertide, OT);
-The option to use the same intercessions (the traditional Benedictine Office does not use intercessions, but instead the Kyrie Eleison followed by the Our Father);
-The same collects for all hours, feasts, liturgical times;
-The option to eliminate imprecatory psalms and verses;
-The option to use the vernacular using approved translations.
If you regularly pray with Benedictines, even if not an oblate (e.g. you live close to a monastery and attend Offices there frequently) it would make sense to use their breviary to avoid breaking up your LOTH and missing psalms. You would be doing so licitly, IMHO.
So IMHO it’s relevant to know that this option is out there. The Benedictines are cloistered, but not closed so laypeople can and do attend their Offices.