S
STT
Guest
I make a distinction between “I believe” and “I think”, by first I mean that I consider the subject matter might be true because I experience it and by second I mean that I am sure that subject matter is true because I have a proof for it. In this regards, I believe that Devils exist but I think that 2+2=4.And you are certain that the devil exists, apparently, though it isn’t clear to me that you can move from your experience of the devil to the existence of the devil without undermining your whole thesis.
I believe on everything that I experience but I cannot prove that they exist.To be consistent, you can only claim that your experience of the devil is what you are certain of, not the existence of the devil. Otherwise, if the devil exists because you have experienced it, then why doesn’t the universe exist because you experience it? Or trees, deer, the Sun and people around you? Or your “self” for that matter, because you undeniably experience those?
Because our experiences could be a part of His creation. How could we be sure that there is an experiencer?As for Descarte’s Demon, why should I waste my time if you can only possibly be convinced that YOUR experience ALONE exists?
I think my position is clear by now considering the previous comments.As far as I can tell, you are being completely arbitrary with regard to what you accept as “proven” by your direct experience and what you choose to deny as existing.
Your standard for “proof” of existing is entirely capricious.